Kapell 1951

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		26	0.56	48	0.00	38	0.07	37	0.22	51	0.05	44	0.10
Anderszewski 2003		21	0.57	2	0.10	7	0.11	9	0.52	4	0.57	4	0.54
Ashkenazy 1981		17	0.61	25	0.01	16	0.10	10	0.49	13	0.46	17	0.47
Bacha 2000		59	0.45	33	0.00	60	0.04	66	0.04	43	0.12	49	0.07
Badura 1965		76	0.35	81	0.00	62	0.04	59	0.04	46	0.06	56	0.05
Barbosa 1983		40	0.52	53	0.00	31	0.08	34	0.29	19	0.44	30	0.36
Biret 1990		15	0.61	64	0.00	28	0.10	23	0.43	9	0.53	14	0.48
Blet 2003		19	0.60	28	0.00	25	0.12	20	0.44	5	0.47	22	0.45
Block 1995		66	0.41	73	0.00	72	0.03	78	0.03	78	0.03	82	0.03
Blumental 1952		72	0.38	9	0.03	15	0.10	31	0.31	8	0.45	29	0.37
Boshniakovich 1969		71	0.40	72	0.00	77	0.03	77	0.03	63	0.03	83	0.03
Brailowsky 1960		69	0.40	62	0.00	80	0.04	69	0.04	61	0.04	58	0.04
Bunin 1987		8	0.65	16	0.01	12	0.10	5	0.53	6	0.53	6	0.53
Bunin 1987b		7	0.65	44	0.00	13	0.12	4	0.53	6	0.53	5	0.53
Chiu 1999		73	0.38	27	0.00	58	0.04	60	0.04	56	0.04	59	0.04
Cohen 1997		79	0.30	77	0.00	78	0.03	75	0.03	60	0.04	84	0.03
Cortot 1951		23	0.56	74	0.00	23	0.11	21	0.43	8	0.50	21	0.46
Csalog 1996		60	0.45	30	0.00	76	0.04	67	0.04	39	0.17	48	0.08
Czerny 1949		18	0.60	42	0.00	22	0.10	13	0.47	13	0.56	10	0.51
Czerny 1990		2	0.70	11	0.02	6	0.14	2	0.55	6	0.58	3	0.56
Duchoud 2007		5	0.66	35	0.00	21	0.12	14	0.46	12	0.47	19	0.46
Ezaki 2006		30	0.55	37	0.00	37	0.06	35	0.27	55	0.05	41	0.12
Falvay 1989		44	0.51	69	0.00	51	0.04	65	0.04	49	0.05	60	0.04
Farrell 1958		38	0.52	57	0.00	48	0.07	46	0.07	22	0.33	38	0.15
Ferenczy 1958		4	0.67	22	0.01	4	0.12	12	0.48	2	0.57	8	0.52
Fliere 1977		24	0.56	41	0.00	46	0.06	47	0.06	51	0.06	51	0.06
Fou 1978		75	0.37	54	0.00	81	0.04	56	0.04	75	0.04	63	0.04
Francois 1956		9	0.64	23	0.01	27	0.11	24	0.42	15	0.42	24	0.42
Friedman 1923		85	0.21	60	0.00	43	0.06	43	0.12	30	0.22	37	0.16
Friedman 1923b		84	0.22	65	0.00	42	0.06	40	0.13	29	0.25	35	0.18
Friedman 1930		64	0.43	18	0.01	29	0.10	27	0.39	12	0.52	23	0.45
Garcia 2007		78	0.30	55	0.00	64	0.04	71	0.04	34	0.19	47	0.09
Garcia 2007b		86	0.20	78	0.00	70	0.03	74	0.03	41	0.12	53	0.06
Gierzod 1998		36	0.53	75	0.00	36	0.08	33	0.29	42	0.10	36	0.17
Gornostaeva 1994		43	0.51	70	0.00	68	0.05	54	0.05	64	0.04	74	0.04
Groot 1988		22	0.57	86	0.00	55	0.05	55	0.05	73	0.03	76	0.04
Harasiewicz 1955		57	0.47	6	0.06	9	0.12	11	0.49	33	0.23	34	0.34
Hatto 1993		58	0.47	15	0.01	18	0.12	26	0.40	8	0.53	20	0.46
Hatto 1997		37	0.53	10	0.03	10	0.12	16	0.45	7	0.52	13	0.48
Horowitz 1949		47	0.51	7	0.05	34	0.07	42	0.12	32	0.19	39	0.15
Indjic 1988		53	0.49	39	0.00	17	0.10	25	0.41	7	0.53	15	0.47
Kapell 1951		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Kissin 1993		62	0.44	45	0.00	71	0.03	80	0.03	61	0.04	81	0.03
Kushner 1989		33	0.54	87	0.00	56	0.04	68	0.04	61	0.04	64	0.04
Luisada 1991		48	0.50	34	0.00	40	0.06	41	0.12	45	0.07	45	0.09
Lushtak 2004		25	0.56	32	0.00	20	0.11	15	0.46	16	0.48	16	0.47
Malcuzynski 1961		14	0.62	63	0.00	39	0.06	39	0.13	46	0.06	46	0.09
Magaloff 1978		46	0.51	49	0.00	67	0.04	57	0.04	63	0.03	78	0.03
Magin 1975		74	0.37	24	0.01	69	0.03	73	0.03	56	0.04	79	0.03
Michalowski 1933		51	0.49	56	0.00	11	0.10	18	0.45	5	0.47	18	0.46
Milkina 1970		49	0.50	79	0.00	74	0.03	83	0.03	60	0.04	80	0.03
Mohovich 1999		34	0.54	71	0.00	52	0.04	63	0.04	64	0.04	73	0.04
Moravec 1969		12	0.63	59	0.00	32	0.07	28	0.37	17	0.38	27	0.37
Morozova 2008		63	0.44	43	0.00	45	0.05	49	0.05	66	0.04	70	0.04
Neighaus 1950		35	0.54	38	0.00	47	0.09	45	0.09	58	0.05	50	0.07
Niedzielski 1931		42	0.52	19	0.01	49	0.05	51	0.05	13	0.39	40	0.14
Ohlsson 1999		10	0.64	29	0.00	26	0.11	17	0.45	23	0.27	32	0.35
Osinska 1989		27	0.56	68	0.00	44	0.06	44	0.11	36	0.14	42	0.12
Pachmann 1927		77	0.34	13	0.02	79	0.03	76	0.03	50	0.05	68	0.04
Paderewski 1930		13	0.62	20	0.01	30	0.10	22	0.43	1	0.55	12	0.49
Perlemuter 1992		70	0.40	66	0.00	59	0.05	50	0.05	66	0.04	57	0.04
Pierdomenico 2008		65	0.43	83	0.00	65	0.04	72	0.04	54	0.05	61	0.04
Poblocka 1999		1	0.71	1	0.19	1	0.18	1	0.57	1	0.66	1	0.61
Rabcewiczowa 1932		32	0.54	84	0.00	35	0.06	30	0.32	18	0.46	26	0.38
Rachmaninoff 1923		56	0.47	31	0.00	41	0.06	38	0.15	44	0.09	43	0.12
Rangell 2001		41	0.52	17	0.01	61	0.04	62	0.04	54	0.04	75	0.04
Richter 1976		29	0.55	12	0.02	14	0.10	32	0.30	9	0.41	31	0.35
Rosen 1989		55	0.48	61	0.00	63	0.05	48	0.05	50	0.04	72	0.04
Rosenthal 1930		61	0.45	58	0.00	66	0.04	61	0.04	47	0.05	71	0.04
Rosenthal 1931		82	0.24	82	0.00	86	0.02	85	0.02	65	0.03	87	0.02
Rosenthal 1931b		83	0.23	85	0.00	85	0.02	89	0.02	71	0.03	89	0.02
Rosenthal 1931c		67	0.41	88	0.00	75	0.03	79	0.03	61	0.04	85	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		80	0.28	89	0.00	84	0.02	84	0.02	71	0.03	88	0.02
Rossi 2007		87	0.11	90	0.00	87	0.02	86	0.02	67	0.03	86	0.02
Rubinstein 1939		81	0.28	14	0.01	83	0.03	82	0.03	47	0.05	62	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		68	0.41	8	0.04	82	0.04	64	0.04	68	0.04	77	0.04
Rubinstein 1966		54	0.48	51	0.00	73	0.03	81	0.03	55	0.06	69	0.04
Schilhawsky 1960		11	0.64	36	0.00	5	0.12	7	0.53	1	0.65	2	0.59
Shebanova 2002		45	0.51	50	0.00	50	0.04	58	0.04	55	0.06	54	0.05
Smith 1975		20	0.59	40	0.00	24	0.09	19	0.45	21	0.34	25	0.39
Sokolov 2002		3	0.68	5	0.08	8	0.13	3	0.53	5	0.50	9	0.51
Sztompka 1959		6	0.66	4	0.09	3	0.12	6	0.53	4	0.51	7	0.52
Tomsic 1995		31	0.55	47	0.00	54	0.05	52	0.05	69	0.04	67	0.04
Uninsky 1932		39	0.52	21	0.01	19	0.10	29	0.36	16	0.39	28	0.37
Uninsky 1971		16	0.61	3	0.09	2	0.12	8	0.52	12	0.49	11	0.50
Wasowski 1980		28	0.56	26	0.00	33	0.08	36	0.27	11	0.42	33	0.34
Zak 1937		50	0.50	76	0.00	57	0.04	70	0.04	60	0.05	65	0.04
Zak 1951		52	0.49	67	0.00	53	0.05	53	0.05	64	0.04	66	0.04
Random 1		90	-0.15	80	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	90	0.01	90	0.01
Random 2		89	-0.01	46	0.00	89	0.02	88	0.02	37	0.13	55	0.05
Random 3		88	0.02	52	0.00	88	0.02	87	0.02	35	0.20	52	0.06

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).