Fliere 1977

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		36	0.58	58	0.00	56	0.05	61	0.05	38	0.12	67	0.08
Anderszewski 2003		72	0.43	55	0.00	74	0.04	75	0.04	80	0.02	84	0.03
Ashkenazy 1981		16	0.65	10	0.02	12	0.12	9	0.58	14	0.46	18	0.52
Bacha 2000		75	0.40	86	0.00	82	0.03	80	0.03	64	0.04	83	0.03
Badura 1965		65	0.49	66	0.00	53	0.04	65	0.04	12	0.45	55	0.13
Barbosa 1983		54	0.53	51	0.00	26	0.06	27	0.25	17	0.45	26	0.34
Biret 1990		56	0.52	87	0.00	71	0.04	72	0.04	60	0.04	81	0.04
Blet 2003		13	0.66	26	0.00	19	0.14	11	0.56	2	0.63	8	0.59
Block 1995		35	0.59	29	0.00	24	0.07	29	0.23	5	0.55	24	0.36
Blumental 1952		78	0.37	31	0.00	75	0.03	81	0.03	56	0.04	87	0.03
Boshniakovich 1969		8	0.68	3	0.06	4	0.14	6	0.61	2	0.70	5	0.65
Brailowsky 1960		49	0.54	40	0.00	58	0.05	55	0.05	20	0.39	49	0.14
Bunin 1987		32	0.60	77	0.00	45	0.07	46	0.07	24	0.35	45	0.16
Bunin 1987b		31	0.60	16	0.01	44	0.07	37	0.13	24	0.35	40	0.21
Chiu 1999		23	0.62	13	0.01	9	0.12	7	0.61	2	0.69	4	0.65
Cohen 1997		87	0.31	78	0.00	86	0.04	64	0.04	58	0.04	80	0.04
Cortot 1951		66	0.46	63	0.00	76	0.03	83	0.03	59	0.04	88	0.03
Csalog 1996		64	0.49	45	0.00	68	0.05	59	0.05	23	0.39	50	0.14
Czerny 1949		70	0.44	79	0.00	83	0.03	78	0.03	60	0.04	86	0.03
Czerny 1990		4	0.70	4	0.06	8	0.12	12	0.56	3	0.61	12	0.58
Duchoud 2007		33	0.60	23	0.00	27	0.09	24	0.29	8	0.49	23	0.38
Ezaki 2006		22	0.62	46	0.00	25	0.07	26	0.26	32	0.22	34	0.24
Falvay 1989		48	0.55	69	0.00	43	0.05	43	0.10	38	0.14	58	0.12
Farrell 1958		62	0.49	80	0.00	73	0.04	68	0.04	38	0.18	66	0.08
Ferenczy 1958		86	0.31	81	0.00	87	0.03	79	0.03	63	0.04	85	0.03
Fliere 1977		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Fou 1978		17	0.65	2	0.14	2	0.20	4	0.64	3	0.59	7	0.61
Francois 1956		51	0.54	60	0.00	57	0.04	63	0.04	52	0.05	82	0.04
Friedman 1923		82	0.34	19	0.01	66	0.05	58	0.05	15	0.42	53	0.14
Friedman 1923b		81	0.35	14	0.01	65	0.04	71	0.04	15	0.44	56	0.13
Friedman 1930		67	0.46	11	0.02	33	0.05	44	0.10	15	0.48	38	0.22
Garcia 2007		74	0.40	37	0.00	64	0.04	69	0.04	5	0.64	44	0.16
Garcia 2007b		85	0.33	53	0.00	78	0.02	85	0.02	21	0.32	68	0.08
Gierzod 1998		52	0.54	56	0.00	52	0.05	62	0.05	59	0.05	76	0.05
Gornostaeva 1994		14	0.66	30	0.00	29	0.07	25	0.28	17	0.41	27	0.34
Groot 1988		3	0.71	5	0.05	5	0.12	8	0.59	5	0.57	13	0.58
Harasiewicz 1955		43	0.56	41	0.00	20	0.13	23	0.37	18	0.35	25	0.36
Hatto 1993		69	0.44	25	0.00	31	0.06	36	0.15	17	0.35	37	0.23
Hatto 1997		76	0.39	73	0.00	62	0.04	66	0.04	50	0.05	78	0.04
Horowitz 1949		39	0.57	61	0.00	41	0.06	41	0.11	14	0.38	41	0.20
Indjic 1988		73	0.42	34	0.00	32	0.05	42	0.11	27	0.24	43	0.16
Kapell 1951		41	0.56	47	0.00	50	0.06	51	0.06	47	0.06	70	0.06
Kissin 1993		7	0.68	7	0.03	3	0.15	3	0.66	4	0.68	2	0.67
Kushner 1989		6	0.69	43	0.00	17	0.12	18	0.51	4	0.65	11	0.58
Luisada 1991		20	0.63	20	0.01	23	0.07	21	0.39	8	0.46	22	0.42
Lushtak 2004		42	0.56	57	0.00	34	0.05	32	0.21	27	0.33	33	0.26
Malcuzynski 1961		2	0.72	32	0.00	7	0.14	14	0.54	10	0.49	19	0.51
Magaloff 1978		1	0.76	1	0.33	1	0.33	1	0.78	1	0.73	1	0.75
Magin 1975		38	0.57	54	0.00	47	0.06	50	0.06	15	0.37	46	0.15
Michalowski 1933		68	0.44	35	0.00	61	0.05	54	0.05	38	0.17	65	0.09
Milkina 1970		63	0.49	64	0.00	69	0.04	67	0.04	48	0.06	74	0.05
Mohovich 1999		26	0.61	49	0.00	40	0.05	35	0.15	23	0.32	39	0.22
Moravec 1969		60	0.50	48	0.00	63	0.06	48	0.06	49	0.05	73	0.05
Morozova 2008		24	0.62	12	0.02	13	0.11	15	0.52	2	0.55	17	0.53
Neighaus 1950		10	0.68	27	0.00	10	0.13	5	0.63	12	0.55	10	0.59
Niedzielski 1931		59	0.50	44	0.00	67	0.04	76	0.04	16	0.32	59	0.11
Ohlsson 1999		12	0.67	39	0.00	22	0.11	20	0.44	13	0.42	21	0.43
Osinska 1989		25	0.61	28	0.00	48	0.06	53	0.06	17	0.34	48	0.14
Pachmann 1927		40	0.57	21	0.01	18	0.11	19	0.45	3	0.68	15	0.55
Paderewski 1930		28	0.60	42	0.00	42	0.06	40	0.12	9	0.50	36	0.24
Perlemuter 1992		15	0.66	6	0.04	6	0.16	10	0.57	4	0.65	6	0.61
Pierdomenico 2008		30	0.60	38	0.00	35	0.05	38	0.13	4	0.57	32	0.27
Poblocka 1999		9	0.68	15	0.01	14	0.10	17	0.52	2	0.57	16	0.54
Rabcewiczowa 1932		71	0.43	88	0.00	85	0.04	73	0.04	62	0.04	77	0.04
Rachmaninoff 1923		47	0.55	36	0.00	30	0.07	31	0.23	11	0.48	28	0.33
Rangell 2001		18	0.65	9	0.03	16	0.11	16	0.52	1	0.63	14	0.57
Richter 1976		19	0.64	22	0.01	21	0.11	22	0.39	1	0.59	20	0.48
Rosen 1989		11	0.67	33	0.00	15	0.12	13	0.54	5	0.64	9	0.59
Rosenthal 1930		58	0.51	52	0.00	70	0.04	70	0.04	34	0.28	61	0.11
Rosenthal 1931		79	0.36	62	0.00	80	0.02	87	0.02	37	0.17	71	0.06
Rosenthal 1931b		80	0.36	89	0.00	79	0.02	86	0.02	32	0.20	72	0.06
Rosenthal 1931c		57	0.52	74	0.00	55	0.05	57	0.05	18	0.40	52	0.14
Rosenthal 1931d		77	0.39	75	0.00	81	0.03	82	0.03	30	0.18	69	0.07
Rossi 2007		84	0.34	82	0.00	77	0.03	84	0.03	25	0.26	63	0.09
Rubinstein 1939		83	0.34	59	0.00	84	0.03	77	0.03	24	0.35	62	0.10
Rubinstein 1952		46	0.55	50	0.00	54	0.05	60	0.05	18	0.43	47	0.15
Rubinstein 1966		45	0.55	76	0.00	51	0.05	56	0.05	20	0.41	51	0.14
Schilhawsky 1960		50	0.54	68	0.00	59	0.06	49	0.06	28	0.28	54	0.13
Shebanova 2002		5	0.69	8	0.03	11	0.17	2	0.68	4	0.64	3	0.66
Smith 1975		29	0.60	65	0.00	46	0.07	47	0.07	42	0.12	64	0.09
Sokolov 2002		27	0.61	24	0.00	49	0.08	45	0.08	42	0.17	57	0.12
Sztompka 1959		21	0.63	17	0.01	28	0.08	34	0.18	16	0.44	31	0.28
Tomsic 1995		34	0.59	67	0.00	38	0.07	28	0.24	25	0.25	35	0.24
Uninsky 1932		53	0.53	18	0.01	60	0.06	52	0.06	32	0.19	60	0.11
Uninsky 1971		61	0.50	83	0.00	72	0.04	74	0.04	47	0.07	75	0.05
Wasowski 1980		55	0.53	70	0.00	39	0.06	39	0.12	24	0.30	42	0.19
Zak 1937		37	0.58	84	0.00	36	0.05	30	0.23	13	0.45	29	0.32
Zak 1951		44	0.56	71	0.00	37	0.07	33	0.21	22	0.38	30	0.28
Random 1		88	0.00	85	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	41	0.09	79	0.04
Random 2		90	-0.07	90	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	80	0.02	89	0.01
Random 3		89	-0.03	72	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	83	0.02	90	0.01

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).