Ezaki 2006

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		2	0.75	1	0.38	1	0.38	2	0.68	1	0.75	1	0.71
Anderszewski 2003		55	0.49	70	0.00	50	0.05	49	0.05	25	0.28	52	0.12
Ashkenazy 1981		37	0.57	45	0.00	37	0.05	39	0.11	42	0.11	57	0.11
Bacha 2000		58	0.47	53	0.00	67	0.03	75	0.03	20	0.43	54	0.11
Badura 1965		38	0.56	41	0.00	26	0.08	21	0.34	3	0.62	14	0.46
Barbosa 1983		49	0.52	60	0.00	40	0.05	36	0.14	25	0.40	37	0.24
Biret 1990		35	0.57	15	0.01	34	0.06	35	0.15	19	0.46	34	0.26
Blet 2003		44	0.54	87	0.00	49	0.05	52	0.05	37	0.17	62	0.09
Block 1995		67	0.44	88	0.00	78	0.03	71	0.03	73	0.03	85	0.03
Blumental 1952		73	0.38	80	0.00	54	0.04	58	0.04	38	0.16	67	0.08
Boshniakovich 1969		48	0.52	33	0.00	57	0.04	62	0.04	41	0.16	68	0.08
Brailowsky 1960		28	0.59	8	0.02	36	0.05	42	0.10	9	0.46	38	0.21
Bunin 1987		18	0.64	18	0.01	13	0.12	17	0.42	9	0.48	16	0.45
Bunin 1987b		16	0.64	9	0.02	12	0.10	16	0.42	9	0.48	15	0.45
Chiu 1999		71	0.42	89	0.00	69	0.03	69	0.03	55	0.05	77	0.04
Cohen 1997		79	0.34	21	0.01	71	0.03	79	0.03	38	0.14	69	0.06
Cortot 1951		47	0.52	47	0.00	53	0.04	67	0.04	19	0.35	53	0.12
Csalog 1996		80	0.33	71	0.00	83	0.03	80	0.03	68	0.04	83	0.03
Czerny 1949		8	0.68	25	0.01	8	0.15	6	0.59	4	0.74	3	0.66
Czerny 1990		22	0.62	58	0.00	27	0.07	24	0.30	22	0.30	31	0.30
Duchoud 2007		40	0.55	39	0.00	44	0.04	45	0.08	30	0.37	43	0.17
Ezaki 2006		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Falvay 1989		26	0.61	29	0.00	25	0.08	30	0.27	15	0.35	29	0.31
Farrell 1958		65	0.45	40	0.00	74	0.03	78	0.03	43	0.10	71	0.05
Ferenczy 1958		25	0.61	28	0.00	35	0.05	34	0.15	3	0.56	32	0.29
Fliere 1977		21	0.62	55	0.00	31	0.06	32	0.22	26	0.26	36	0.24
Fou 1978		31	0.58	5	0.05	14	0.10	20	0.34	27	0.38	24	0.36
Francois 1956		9	0.66	12	0.01	5	0.15	8	0.55	4	0.59	8	0.57
Friedman 1923		84	0.20	90	0.00	81	0.02	83	0.02	51	0.06	86	0.03
Friedman 1923b		85	0.20	81	0.00	82	0.03	73	0.03	45	0.07	75	0.05
Friedman 1930		74	0.37	82	0.00	63	0.04	64	0.04	29	0.30	56	0.11
Garcia 2007		86	0.18	59	0.00	84	0.02	84	0.02	64	0.04	84	0.03
Garcia 2007b		87	0.17	77	0.00	86	0.02	88	0.02	83	0.02	90	0.02
Gierzod 1998		23	0.61	42	0.00	21	0.08	18	0.39	4	0.47	18	0.43
Gornostaeva 1994		5	0.71	11	0.02	7	0.16	9	0.52	5	0.61	9	0.56
Groot 1988		13	0.64	35	0.00	23	0.09	23	0.31	18	0.38	27	0.34
Harasiewicz 1955		39	0.56	74	0.00	19	0.09	27	0.29	19	0.33	30	0.31
Hatto 1993		77	0.35	22	0.01	60	0.05	53	0.05	28	0.25	58	0.11
Hatto 1997		63	0.46	6	0.03	20	0.08	22	0.33	10	0.46	22	0.39
Horowitz 1949		70	0.43	56	0.00	66	0.05	56	0.05	36	0.14	66	0.08
Indjic 1988		76	0.36	31	0.00	61	0.08	44	0.08	26	0.25	46	0.14
Kapell 1951		41	0.55	54	0.00	51	0.05	55	0.05	35	0.27	50	0.12
Kissin 1993		24	0.61	44	0.00	32	0.07	31	0.24	27	0.31	33	0.27
Kushner 1989		30	0.59	48	0.00	47	0.06	48	0.06	30	0.24	49	0.12
Luisada 1991		42	0.55	78	0.00	52	0.04	60	0.04	36	0.19	60	0.09
Lushtak 2004		20	0.63	17	0.01	16	0.13	10	0.49	6	0.56	11	0.52
Malcuzynski 1961		3	0.73	3	0.07	3	0.16	4	0.65	4	0.57	5	0.61
Magaloff 1978		12	0.64	34	0.00	22	0.08	15	0.42	26	0.25	28	0.32
Magin 1975		57	0.48	67	0.00	59	0.04	68	0.04	36	0.17	65	0.08
Michalowski 1933		81	0.33	83	0.00	77	0.03	77	0.03	51	0.05	79	0.04
Milkina 1970		46	0.53	65	0.00	62	0.04	61	0.04	46	0.07	72	0.05
Mohovich 1999		6	0.70	38	0.00	9	0.23	7	0.56	4	0.63	7	0.59
Moravec 1969		60	0.47	57	0.00	64	0.05	50	0.05	55	0.05	70	0.05
Morozova 2008		15	0.64	4	0.06	11	0.13	14	0.44	7	0.44	17	0.44
Neighaus 1950		7	0.69	7	0.02	6	0.14	3	0.66	13	0.55	6	0.60
Niedzielski 1931		82	0.27	66	0.00	85	0.02	87	0.02	88	0.02	87	0.02
Ohlsson 1999		10	0.66	37	0.00	15	0.13	11	0.48	8	0.49	13	0.48
Osinska 1989		32	0.58	26	0.01	48	0.07	46	0.07	15	0.39	42	0.17
Pachmann 1927		72	0.39	51	0.00	72	0.03	76	0.03	57	0.05	78	0.04
Paderewski 1930		61	0.47	84	0.00	76	0.03	81	0.03	75	0.03	82	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		43	0.55	50	0.00	45	0.05	51	0.05	29	0.27	48	0.12
Pierdomenico 2008		64	0.46	62	0.00	70	0.04	59	0.04	35	0.19	61	0.09
Poblocka 1999		19	0.63	16	0.01	24	0.08	26	0.29	13	0.39	25	0.34
Rabcewiczowa 1932		27	0.60	19	0.01	33	0.08	33	0.20	11	0.58	26	0.34
Rachmaninoff 1923		54	0.50	68	0.00	41	0.04	38	0.11	25	0.28	41	0.18
Rangell 2001		29	0.59	13	0.01	28	0.06	25	0.30	7	0.52	23	0.39
Richter 1976		69	0.43	85	0.00	75	0.02	82	0.02	72	0.03	88	0.02
Rosen 1989		17	0.64	10	0.02	10	0.19	12	0.48	6	0.59	10	0.53
Rosenthal 1930		36	0.57	27	0.00	30	0.09	28	0.29	6	0.64	19	0.43
Rosenthal 1931		59	0.47	24	0.01	39	0.05	41	0.10	5	0.63	35	0.25
Rosenthal 1931b		68	0.44	36	0.00	58	0.04	65	0.04	7	0.54	45	0.15
Rosenthal 1931c		34	0.57	49	0.00	29	0.07	29	0.27	6	0.66	21	0.42
Rosenthal 1931d		66	0.45	30	0.00	65	0.06	47	0.06	13	0.40	44	0.15
Rossi 2007		78	0.35	86	0.00	80	0.03	70	0.03	29	0.21	64	0.08
Rubinstein 1939		83	0.21	63	0.00	87	0.02	85	0.02	63	0.04	81	0.03
Rubinstein 1952		62	0.47	61	0.00	73	0.04	63	0.04	61	0.05	80	0.04
Rubinstein 1966		45	0.54	32	0.00	38	0.05	40	0.11	26	0.32	40	0.19
Schilhawsky 1960		51	0.51	69	0.00	55	0.04	66	0.04	27	0.28	55	0.11
Shebanova 2002		53	0.50	46	0.00	68	0.03	72	0.03	45	0.08	73	0.05
Smith 1975		1	0.75	2	0.12	2	0.26	1	0.72	1	0.68	2	0.70
Sokolov 2002		11	0.66	23	0.01	18	0.09	19	0.38	11	0.46	20	0.42
Sztompka 1959		33	0.57	64	0.00	46	0.05	54	0.05	29	0.31	51	0.12
Tomsic 1995		4	0.72	14	0.01	4	0.15	5	0.64	1	0.64	4	0.64
Uninsky 1932		52	0.51	43	0.00	43	0.04	43	0.08	29	0.22	47	0.13
Uninsky 1971		14	0.64	20	0.01	17	0.09	13	0.45	7	0.53	12	0.49
Wasowski 1980		75	0.36	72	0.00	79	0.03	74	0.03	51	0.05	76	0.04
Zak 1937		56	0.48	79	0.00	56	0.05	57	0.05	38	0.19	59	0.10
Zak 1951		50	0.52	75	0.00	42	0.05	37	0.12	30	0.30	39	0.19
Random 1		90	-0.04	52	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	57	0.04	89	0.02
Random 2		89	-0.01	73	0.00	89	0.02	86	0.02	39	0.12	74	0.05
Random 3		88	0.04	76	0.00	88	0.02	89	0.02	12	0.40	63	0.09

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).