Chiu 1999

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		25	0.47	34	0.00	38	0.07	34	0.24	53	0.05	42	0.11
Anderszewski 2003		80	0.27	81	0.00	82	0.03	84	0.03	83	0.02	87	0.02
Ashkenazy 1981		16	0.53	12	0.03	15	0.12	15	0.51	27	0.31	20	0.40
Bacha 2000		31	0.45	39	0.00	31	0.09	29	0.37	3	0.58	17	0.46
Badura 1965		73	0.32	71	0.00	72	0.03	81	0.03	63	0.04	81	0.03
Barbosa 1983		4	0.59	11	0.03	7	0.15	4	0.66	2	0.63	4	0.64
Biret 1990		21	0.49	43	0.00	18	0.16	16	0.48	7	0.56	12	0.52
Blet 2003		15	0.53	33	0.00	35	0.10	30	0.33	34	0.23	31	0.28
Block 1995		67	0.34	36	0.00	74	0.03	80	0.03	61	0.04	82	0.03
Blumental 1952		60	0.37	30	0.00	44	0.04	44	0.07	31	0.21	41	0.12
Boshniakovich 1969		42	0.42	64	0.00	50	0.04	73	0.04	44	0.11	54	0.07
Brailowsky 1960		40	0.43	82	0.00	53	0.04	60	0.04	30	0.24	44	0.10
Bunin 1987		47	0.42	29	0.00	51	0.04	70	0.04	57	0.05	74	0.04
Bunin 1987b		46	0.42	41	0.00	49	0.04	68	0.04	56	0.05	67	0.04
Chiu 1999		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Cohen 1997		68	0.34	65	0.00	69	0.03	82	0.03	39	0.14	56	0.06
Cortot 1951		78	0.29	48	0.00	85	0.04	67	0.04	82	0.03	84	0.03
Csalog 1996		48	0.42	26	0.00	36	0.07	36	0.20	14	0.50	27	0.32
Czerny 1949		72	0.32	66	0.00	78	0.03	78	0.03	66	0.03	79	0.03
Czerny 1990		20	0.50	19	0.01	23	0.09	18	0.48	33	0.21	28	0.32
Duchoud 2007		17	0.52	9	0.05	10	0.12	7	0.63	2	0.62	6	0.62
Ezaki 2006		43	0.42	75	0.00	56	0.05	55	0.05	69	0.03	62	0.04
Falvay 1989		13	0.53	78	0.00	30	0.13	21	0.43	30	0.20	30	0.29
Farrell 1958		28	0.46	37	0.00	41	0.06	40	0.17	12	0.44	32	0.27
Ferenczy 1958		87	0.16	51	0.00	87	0.02	87	0.02	73	0.03	88	0.02
Fliere 1977		2	0.62	4	0.07	2	0.16	2	0.69	7	0.61	3	0.65
Fou 1978		8	0.57	23	0.00	12	0.15	10	0.58	15	0.45	13	0.51
Francois 1956		65	0.35	76	0.00	59	0.04	62	0.04	61	0.04	77	0.04
Friedman 1923		79	0.29	35	0.00	77	0.03	79	0.03	26	0.28	49	0.09
Friedman 1923b		75	0.30	40	0.00	76	0.04	58	0.04	27	0.27	46	0.10
Friedman 1930		62	0.37	21	0.01	65	0.06	47	0.06	44	0.08	53	0.07
Garcia 2007		77	0.29	44	0.00	75	0.03	77	0.03	32	0.20	52	0.08
Garcia 2007b		66	0.34	72	0.00	70	0.03	83	0.03	18	0.39	43	0.11
Gierzod 1998		69	0.34	67	0.00	66	0.06	46	0.06	71	0.03	73	0.04
Gornostaeva 1994		49	0.41	49	0.00	64	0.06	45	0.06	50	0.05	61	0.05
Groot 1988		26	0.47	59	0.00	20	0.08	22	0.42	34	0.23	29	0.31
Harasiewicz 1955		24	0.48	25	0.00	43	0.07	43	0.13	52	0.04	55	0.07
Hatto 1993		38	0.43	45	0.00	24	0.07	28	0.37	16	0.36	24	0.36
Hatto 1997		56	0.38	68	0.00	27	0.08	33	0.24	29	0.23	34	0.23
Horowitz 1949		22	0.49	10	0.04	14	0.10	14	0.51	8	0.49	14	0.50
Indjic 1988		52	0.41	60	0.00	19	0.09	27	0.39	19	0.34	23	0.36
Kapell 1951		58	0.38	27	0.00	62	0.04	56	0.04	60	0.04	66	0.04
Kissin 1993		23	0.48	53	0.00	29	0.10	19	0.44	32	0.28	26	0.35
Kushner 1989		19	0.50	20	0.01	34	0.08	32	0.28	42	0.13	35	0.19
Luisada 1991		12	0.54	24	0.00	17	0.15	13	0.53	12	0.44	15	0.48
Lushtak 2004		18	0.52	18	0.01	33	0.07	31	0.29	58	0.05	40	0.12
Malcuzynski 1961		39	0.43	52	0.00	42	0.07	42	0.15	67	0.04	51	0.08
Magaloff 1978		33	0.44	14	0.01	16	0.12	17	0.48	25	0.25	25	0.35
Magin 1975		55	0.39	69	0.00	39	0.07	41	0.15	42	0.12	39	0.13
Michalowski 1933		64	0.35	28	0.00	54	0.05	52	0.05	40	0.17	48	0.09
Milkina 1970		44	0.42	73	0.00	25	0.08	25	0.40	16	0.37	22	0.38
Mohovich 1999		27	0.46	86	0.00	46	0.04	69	0.04	46	0.06	60	0.05
Moravec 1969		57	0.38	46	0.00	32	0.08	37	0.20	39	0.12	36	0.15
Morozova 2008		5	0.58	3	0.08	6	0.13	6	0.65	6	0.46	9	0.55
Neighaus 1950		9	0.55	8	0.05	9	0.17	8	0.62	17	0.46	10	0.53
Niedzielski 1931		70	0.33	22	0.00	45	0.04	72	0.04	25	0.20	47	0.09
Ohlsson 1999		11	0.55	7	0.06	5	0.15	5	0.65	5	0.51	7	0.58
Osinska 1989		41	0.43	61	0.00	57	0.05	53	0.05	56	0.05	58	0.05
Pachmann 1927		7	0.57	2	0.09	4	0.15	3	0.66	2	0.70	1	0.68
Paderewski 1930		74	0.31	87	0.00	61	0.04	64	0.04	73	0.03	78	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		32	0.45	77	0.00	58	0.05	49	0.05	50	0.05	57	0.05
Pierdomenico 2008		14	0.53	31	0.00	28	0.09	23	0.41	5	0.55	16	0.47
Poblocka 1999		53	0.40	42	0.00	37	0.07	38	0.18	60	0.04	50	0.08
Rabcewiczowa 1932		71	0.33	50	0.00	73	0.04	71	0.04	66	0.04	65	0.04
Rachmaninoff 1923		37	0.43	13	0.01	22	0.07	20	0.44	20	0.38	18	0.41
Rangell 2001		36	0.43	54	0.00	26	0.07	24	0.40	11	0.43	19	0.41
Richter 1976		30	0.46	15	0.01	21	0.09	39	0.18	43	0.12	37	0.15
Rosen 1989		10	0.55	17	0.01	13	0.13	12	0.54	10	0.51	11	0.52
Rosenthal 1930		85	0.23	79	0.00	83	0.03	85	0.03	78	0.03	80	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		83	0.24	83	0.00	84	0.04	57	0.04	59	0.04	71	0.04
Rosenthal 1931b		81	0.25	84	0.00	80	0.04	75	0.04	54	0.05	76	0.04
Rosenthal 1931c		82	0.25	62	0.00	81	0.03	76	0.03	81	0.03	85	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		86	0.22	88	0.00	79	0.04	59	0.04	55	0.04	75	0.04
Rossi 2007		84	0.23	89	0.00	86	0.02	86	0.02	84	0.02	86	0.02
Rubinstein 1939		76	0.29	16	0.01	60	0.04	63	0.04	11	0.43	38	0.13
Rubinstein 1952		50	0.41	58	0.00	40	0.08	35	0.20	23	0.36	33	0.27
Rubinstein 1966		51	0.41	56	0.00	55	0.05	48	0.05	36	0.21	45	0.10
Schilhawsky 1960		45	0.42	47	0.00	52	0.04	61	0.04	47	0.06	59	0.05
Shebanova 2002		1	0.65	1	0.25	1	0.24	1	0.76	5	0.61	2	0.68
Smith 1975		34	0.44	85	0.00	63	0.05	54	0.05	77	0.03	64	0.04
Sokolov 2002		63	0.36	74	0.00	67	0.05	50	0.05	66	0.03	63	0.04
Sztompka 1959		59	0.37	57	0.00	71	0.04	66	0.04	58	0.05	69	0.04
Tomsic 1995		54	0.39	70	0.00	48	0.04	74	0.04	62	0.04	68	0.04
Uninsky 1932		35	0.44	63	0.00	47	0.04	65	0.04	75	0.04	72	0.04
Uninsky 1971		61	0.37	38	0.00	68	0.05	51	0.05	59	0.04	70	0.04
Wasowski 1980		29	0.46	5	0.06	8	0.17	26	0.39	13	0.40	21	0.39
Zak 1937		3	0.59	6	0.06	3	0.13	9	0.61	3	0.63	5	0.62
Zak 1951		6	0.57	32	0.00	11	0.17	11	0.56	6	0.57	8	0.56
Random 1		88	0.02	55	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	42	0.09	83	0.03
Random 2		90	-0.03	80	0.00	88	0.01	88	0.01	57	0.04	89	0.02
Random 3		89	0.00	90	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	62	0.03	90	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).