Nezu 2005

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		64	0.25	15	0.01	6	0.15	12	0.50	20	0.46	11	0.48
Ax 1995		58	0.48	4	0.02	9	0.08	13	0.49	12	0.57	8	0.53
Bacha 1998		49	0.52	31	0.00	41	0.07	37	0.07	28	0.21	32	0.12
Barbosa 1983		63	0.29	37	0.00	52	0.04	57	0.04	55	0.05	61	0.04
BenOr 1989		46	0.53	53	0.00	57	0.04	54	0.04	63	0.03	65	0.03
Biret 1990		35	0.57	16	0.01	28	0.07	29	0.17	33	0.13	31	0.15
Brailowsky 1960		60	0.43	27	0.00	51	0.06	49	0.06	39	0.08	40	0.07
Chiu 1999		32	0.57	59	0.00	40	0.06	46	0.06	35	0.08	41	0.07
Clidat 1994		53	0.51	49	0.00	31	0.07	31	0.15	34	0.10	33	0.12
Cohen 1997		62	0.33	67	0.00	64	0.02	65	0.02	41	0.05	64	0.03
Cortot 1951		16	0.62	61	0.00	45	0.07	39	0.07	34	0.06	49	0.06
Csalog 1996		10	0.66	28	0.00	8	0.12	7	0.56	32	0.15	19	0.29
Czerny 1989		50	0.52	60	0.00	44	0.06	43	0.06	59	0.04	51	0.05
Ezaki 2006		39	0.56	29	0.00	17	0.11	18	0.39	33	0.15	23	0.24
Falvay 1989		12	0.65	35	0.00	14	0.10	10	0.52	45	0.06	26	0.18
Fiorentino 1962		33	0.57	51	0.00	42	0.06	44	0.06	51	0.05	54	0.05
Fliere 1977		45	0.53	48	0.00	61	0.04	60	0.04	61	0.04	55	0.04
Fou 1978		43	0.54	32	0.00	56	0.04	59	0.04	54	0.05	57	0.04
Francois 1956		30	0.58	36	0.00	36	0.08	35	0.08	14	0.55	25	0.21
Goldenweiser 1946		21	0.60	52	0.00	37	0.07	38	0.07	49	0.05	43	0.06
Gornostaeva 1994		61	0.39	50	0.00	62	0.03	62	0.03	51	0.05	62	0.04
Groot 1988		36	0.56	34	0.00	34	0.08	34	0.08	42	0.06	42	0.07
Hatto 1993		13	0.63	46	0.00	30	0.08	28	0.19	50	0.05	36	0.10
Hatto 1997		8	0.67	11	0.01	20	0.09	20	0.37	26	0.27	16	0.32
Horszowski 1983		54	0.51	64	0.00	47	0.05	53	0.05	51	0.05	50	0.05
Indjic 2001		5	0.68	39	0.00	24	0.09	25	0.31	32	0.15	24	0.22
Katin 1996		7	0.67	26	0.00	15	0.11	16	0.45	31	0.21	17	0.31
Kiepura 1999		51	0.51	57	0.00	58	0.05	52	0.05	34	0.10	39	0.07
Korecka 1992		38	0.56	40	0.00	60	0.03	63	0.03	46	0.06	58	0.04
Kushner 1990		59	0.47	45	0.00	55	0.04	55	0.04	40	0.07	52	0.05
Lilamand 2001		42	0.54	55	0.00	49	0.06	41	0.06	39	0.07	46	0.06
Luisada 1990		20	0.61	12	0.01	19	0.09	21	0.34	30	0.19	22	0.25
Luisada 2008		37	0.56	17	0.00	25	0.07	26	0.25	22	0.32	20	0.28
Lushtak 2004		28	0.58	18	0.00	29	0.07	27	0.21	40	0.07	34	0.12
Malcuzynski 1951		52	0.51	23	0.00	59	0.03	61	0.03	43	0.06	63	0.04
Malcuzynski 1961		44	0.53	42	0.00	53	0.05	50	0.05	56	0.04	59	0.04
Magaloff 1977		41	0.54	56	0.00	46	0.06	42	0.06	43	0.06	47	0.06
Magin 1975		31	0.58	65	0.00	23	0.10	24	0.31	36	0.07	28	0.15
Meguri 1997		9	0.67	8	0.01	16	0.15	9	0.52	8	0.61	6	0.56
Milkina 1970		18	0.62	30	0.00	39	0.06	45	0.06	47	0.06	44	0.06
Mohovich 1999		26	0.59	5	0.01	35	0.08	36	0.08	49	0.05	48	0.06
Nezu 2005		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Ohlsson 1999		17	0.62	19	0.00	22	0.11	17	0.41	21	0.37	15	0.39
Olejniczak 1990		19	0.61	20	0.00	43	0.07	40	0.07	33	0.11	37	0.09
Osinska 1989		6	0.68	44	0.00	26	0.08	23	0.33	30	0.19	21	0.25
Perlemuter 1992		40	0.55	14	0.01	50	0.05	51	0.05	16	0.45	27	0.15
Poblocka 1999		3	0.70	3	0.06	3	0.20	3	0.70	8	0.65	2	0.67
Rangell 2001		23	0.60	33	0.00	21	0.09	22	0.34	23	0.46	14	0.40
Richter 1960		22	0.60	43	0.00	38	0.06	47	0.06	47	0.05	53	0.05
Richter 1961		55	0.51	66	0.00	54	0.04	56	0.04	51	0.05	56	0.04
Rosen 1989		11	0.66	9	0.01	7	0.12	6	0.56	15	0.60	4	0.58
Rubinstein 1939		27	0.59	21	0.00	11	0.10	11	0.51	12	0.54	10	0.52
Rubinstein 1952		47	0.52	6	0.01	33	0.06	33	0.12	45	0.06	38	0.08
Rubinstein 1966		24	0.60	25	0.00	10	0.08	8	0.52	30	0.17	18	0.30
Rudanovskaya 2007		4	0.69	62	0.00	27	0.08	30	0.16	31	0.14	29	0.15
Shebanova 2002		15	0.63	13	0.01	5	0.20	4	0.60	16	0.48	7	0.54
Smith 1975		14	0.63	22	0.00	13	0.12	14	0.48	8	0.56	9	0.52
Sztompka 1959		57	0.48	63	0.00	63	0.04	58	0.04	56	0.05	60	0.04
Tanyel 1992		56	0.50	10	0.01	18	0.10	19	0.39	16	0.57	12	0.47
Tsujii 2005		2	0.75	2	0.20	2	0.59	2	0.84	2	0.72	1	0.78
Uninsky 1959		25	0.60	47	0.00	48	0.06	48	0.06	40	0.06	45	0.06
Vardi 1988		34	0.57	7	0.01	4	0.19	5	0.60	11	0.58	3	0.59
Wasowski 1980		29	0.58	24	0.00	12	0.11	15	0.47	3	0.70	5	0.57
Zimerman 1975		48	0.52	38	0.00	32	0.07	32	0.13	32	0.17	30	0.15
Average		1	0.81	1	0.55	1	0.55	1	0.87	31	0.18	13	0.40
Random 1		66	0.00	54	0.00	67	0.01	67	0.01	40	0.04	67	0.02
Random 2		65	0.02	58	0.00	66	0.02	66	0.02	60	0.03	66	0.02
Random 3		67	0.00	41	0.00	65	0.03	64	0.03	18	0.37	35	0.11

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).