Meguri 1997

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		64	0.12	55	0.00	31	0.08	31	0.20	58	0.05	33	0.10
Ax 1995		60	0.35	27	0.00	45	0.05	47	0.05	49	0.04	57	0.04
Bacha 1998		57	0.39	51	0.00	64	0.02	66	0.02	66	0.02	65	0.02
Barbosa 1983		63	0.31	26	0.00	38	0.07	39	0.07	51	0.07	36	0.07
BenOr 1989		10	0.61	3	0.08	8	0.13	7	0.63	29	0.30	10	0.43
Biret 1990		31	0.53	47	0.00	24	0.11	28	0.29	37	0.06	25	0.13
Brailowsky 1960		62	0.32	40	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	62	0.03	64	0.02
Chiu 1999		52	0.42	60	0.00	59	0.03	57	0.03	63	0.03	58	0.03
Clidat 1994		32	0.52	12	0.01	10	0.15	12	0.51	16	0.45	9	0.48
Cohen 1997		37	0.51	17	0.01	11	0.17	13	0.49	2	0.75	5	0.61
Cortot 1951		19	0.58	42	0.00	34	0.06	42	0.06	47	0.04	47	0.05
Csalog 1996		15	0.60	48	0.00	26	0.11	25	0.30	54	0.04	30	0.11
Czerny 1989		38	0.51	11	0.02	12	0.13	20	0.44	37	0.08	18	0.19
Ezaki 2006		28	0.54	33	0.00	19	0.12	19	0.45	39	0.07	19	0.18
Falvay 1989		9	0.62	36	0.00	14	0.10	11	0.54	43	0.06	20	0.18
Fiorentino 1962		8	0.63	24	0.00	13	0.09	9	0.60	29	0.19	13	0.34
Fliere 1977		51	0.43	46	0.00	63	0.03	60	0.03	66	0.02	63	0.02
Fou 1978		48	0.46	49	0.00	54	0.04	55	0.04	65	0.03	59	0.03
Francois 1956		56	0.40	44	0.00	66	0.02	64	0.02	62	0.02	66	0.02
Goldenweiser 1946		42	0.50	21	0.00	51	0.04	53	0.04	57	0.05	50	0.04
Gornostaeva 1994		61	0.34	41	0.00	46	0.04	54	0.04	46	0.06	46	0.05
Groot 1988		14	0.61	22	0.00	17	0.10	14	0.49	32	0.17	15	0.29
Hatto 1993		22	0.57	50	0.00	32	0.08	30	0.21	48	0.05	34	0.10
Hatto 1997		16	0.59	34	0.00	28	0.08	29	0.28	59	0.04	31	0.11
Horszowski 1983		49	0.44	43	0.00	47	0.05	48	0.05	60	0.03	49	0.04
Indjic 2001		12	0.61	52	0.00	29	0.10	27	0.29	57	0.04	32	0.11
Katin 1996		2	0.71	8	0.03	3	0.18	6	0.69	18	0.44	7	0.55
Kiepura 1999		20	0.58	37	0.00	18	0.11	16	0.48	12	0.51	8	0.49
Korecka 1992		35	0.51	45	0.00	56	0.05	50	0.05	59	0.04	52	0.04
Kushner 1990		54	0.42	58	0.00	53	0.05	51	0.05	56	0.04	53	0.04
Lilamand 2001		24	0.57	28	0.00	23	0.10	22	0.40	30	0.26	14	0.32
Luisada 1990		47	0.47	59	0.00	48	0.06	45	0.06	59	0.04	45	0.05
Luisada 2008		59	0.35	62	0.00	58	0.03	58	0.03	62	0.03	60	0.03
Lushtak 2004		17	0.59	13	0.01	16	0.10	17	0.47	41	0.06	23	0.17
Malcuzynski 1951		55	0.41	63	0.00	60	0.03	59	0.03	55	0.04	62	0.03
Malcuzynski 1961		29	0.53	19	0.01	37	0.08	36	0.08	55	0.04	38	0.06
Magaloff 1977		41	0.50	32	0.00	43	0.06	43	0.06	57	0.04	44	0.05
Magin 1975		30	0.53	18	0.01	27	0.09	24	0.30	52	0.05	26	0.12
Meguri 1997		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Milkina 1970		21	0.57	31	0.00	36	0.07	38	0.07	53	0.05	37	0.06
Mohovich 1999		33	0.52	64	0.00	44	0.06	41	0.06	64	0.03	56	0.04
Nezu 2005		6	0.67	7	0.04	7	0.16	8	0.61	9	0.52	6	0.56
Ohlsson 1999		27	0.54	53	0.00	35	0.06	40	0.06	52	0.05	43	0.05
Olejniczak 1990		13	0.61	29	0.00	25	0.10	23	0.33	31	0.14	17	0.21
Osinska 1989		3	0.71	6	0.05	4	0.30	2	0.74	9	0.59	3	0.66
Perlemuter 1992		45	0.48	57	0.00	55	0.04	56	0.04	42	0.05	51	0.04
Poblocka 1999		39	0.50	66	0.00	52	0.06	46	0.06	57	0.04	40	0.05
Rangell 2001		7	0.66	4	0.07	5	0.23	5	0.69	9	0.71	2	0.70
Richter 1960		11	0.61	14	0.01	15	0.10	15	0.49	26	0.27	12	0.36
Richter 1961		43	0.50	35	0.00	33	0.09	33	0.17	42	0.07	28	0.11
Rosen 1989		4	0.69	1	0.29	1	0.28	3	0.72	7	0.74	1	0.73
Rubinstein 1939		44	0.48	65	0.00	39	0.08	34	0.08	56	0.03	42	0.05
Rubinstein 1952		53	0.42	39	0.00	50	0.05	52	0.05	55	0.05	48	0.05
Rubinstein 1966		34	0.52	10	0.02	21	0.15	21	0.43	55	0.04	24	0.13
Rudanovskaya 2007		18	0.59	38	0.00	42	0.06	44	0.06	59	0.03	54	0.04
Shebanova 2002		25	0.56	30	0.00	20	0.16	18	0.45	35	0.07	22	0.18
Smith 1975		36	0.51	20	0.00	49	0.05	49	0.05	48	0.06	41	0.05
Sztompka 1959		58	0.37	67	0.00	67	0.01	67	0.01	67	0.01	67	0.01
Tanyel 1992		23	0.57	16	0.01	9	0.14	10	0.60	10	0.67	4	0.63
Tsujii 2005		5	0.67	5	0.06	6	0.29	4	0.69	25	0.24	11	0.41
Uninsky 1959		26	0.56	56	0.00	40	0.08	35	0.08	39	0.06	35	0.07
Vardi 1988		50	0.44	15	0.01	30	0.06	32	0.19	50	0.06	29	0.11
Wasowski 1980		46	0.48	25	0.00	41	0.08	37	0.08	32	0.14	27	0.11
Zimerman 1975		40	0.50	9	0.03	22	0.11	26	0.30	29	0.25	16	0.27
Average		1	0.74	2	0.18	2	0.20	1	0.77	61	0.04	21	0.18
Random 1		65	0.03	23	0.00	61	0.02	63	0.02	30	0.10	55	0.04
Random 2		66	0.02	54	0.00	62	0.02	62	0.02	52	0.04	61	0.03
Random 3		67	-0.01	61	0.00	57	0.03	61	0.03	27	0.14	39	0.06

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).