Magaloff 1977

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		64	0.23	14	0.01	16	0.09	20	0.29	34	0.09	24	0.16
Ax 1995		62	0.35	38	0.00	55	0.04	52	0.04	39	0.06	51	0.05
Bacha 1998		55	0.41	59	0.00	57	0.05	50	0.05	52	0.04	55	0.04
Barbosa 1983		63	0.29	67	0.00	56	0.04	58	0.04	54	0.05	60	0.04
BenOr 1989		4	0.62	5	0.02	5	0.27	4	0.67	6	0.59	2	0.63
Biret 1990		25	0.55	13	0.01	25	0.06	27	0.21	34	0.09	27	0.14
Brailowsky 1960		50	0.45	34	0.00	41	0.05	47	0.05	21	0.34	30	0.13
Chiu 1999		36	0.51	57	0.00	27	0.06	23	0.23	36	0.07	31	0.13
Clidat 1994		54	0.41	52	0.00	54	0.04	54	0.04	53	0.05	62	0.04
Cohen 1997		59	0.39	55	0.00	53	0.04	53	0.04	21	0.47	25	0.14
Cortot 1951		13	0.58	18	0.00	21	0.07	28	0.19	32	0.10	28	0.14
Csalog 1996		12	0.59	17	0.00	12	0.11	11	0.47	45	0.06	19	0.17
Czerny 1989		46	0.47	58	0.00	45	0.04	51	0.04	50	0.05	57	0.04
Ezaki 2006		38	0.50	40	0.00	35	0.06	40	0.06	47	0.05	45	0.05
Falvay 1989		8	0.61	20	0.00	11	0.12	10	0.52	47	0.05	20	0.16
Fiorentino 1962		28	0.54	47	0.00	28	0.08	24	0.23	35	0.09	26	0.14
Fliere 1977		42	0.48	23	0.00	42	0.06	41	0.06	36	0.08	40	0.07
Fou 1978		23	0.55	43	0.00	20	0.08	22	0.28	35	0.09	21	0.16
Francois 1956		33	0.53	7	0.02	31	0.08	29	0.18	6	0.62	14	0.33
Goldenweiser 1946		24	0.55	28	0.00	33	0.07	32	0.14	31	0.12	29	0.13
Gornostaeva 1994		53	0.43	12	0.01	52	0.04	59	0.04	33	0.15	39	0.08
Groot 1988		11	0.59	22	0.00	6	0.27	7	0.61	14	0.48	7	0.54
Hatto 1993		21	0.55	36	0.00	39	0.05	49	0.05	41	0.06	52	0.05
Hatto 1997		30	0.54	53	0.00	44	0.04	55	0.04	60	0.04	61	0.04
Horszowski 1983		58	0.40	51	0.00	38	0.06	38	0.06	53	0.05	46	0.05
Indjic 2001		17	0.56	64	0.00	43	0.06	44	0.06	42	0.06	44	0.06
Katin 1996		10	0.59	45	0.00	15	0.09	15	0.39	44	0.07	18	0.17
Kiepura 1999		61	0.36	60	0.00	61	0.04	60	0.04	57	0.04	53	0.04
Korecka 1992		48	0.47	54	0.00	62	0.03	63	0.03	48	0.05	56	0.04
Kushner 1990		39	0.50	41	0.00	37	0.06	39	0.06	34	0.12	38	0.08
Lilamand 2001		44	0.48	31	0.00	29	0.06	30	0.16	46	0.06	35	0.10
Luisada 1990		3	0.63	4	0.03	2	0.28	2	0.71	8	0.64	1	0.67
Luisada 2008		49	0.47	37	0.00	30	0.06	31	0.16	30	0.17	23	0.16
Lushtak 2004		43	0.48	63	0.00	49	0.06	37	0.06	50	0.05	50	0.05
Malcuzynski 1951		15	0.56	19	0.00	14	0.10	12	0.46	3	0.64	8	0.54
Malcuzynski 1961		9	0.60	27	0.00	7	0.24	6	0.63	19	0.46	6	0.54
Magaloff 1977		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Magin 1975		34	0.53	9	0.01	24	0.06	25	0.23	49	0.05	33	0.11
Meguri 1997		41	0.50	48	0.00	58	0.04	57	0.04	43	0.06	49	0.05
Milkina 1970		18	0.56	46	0.00	40	0.05	45	0.05	43	0.07	42	0.06
Mohovich 1999		35	0.51	66	0.00	36	0.05	48	0.05	53	0.04	63	0.04
Nezu 2005		26	0.54	44	0.00	47	0.06	43	0.06	42	0.06	43	0.06
Ohlsson 1999		45	0.47	35	0.00	46	0.05	46	0.05	58	0.04	59	0.04
Olejniczak 1990		20	0.55	50	0.00	23	0.07	21	0.28	16	0.38	13	0.33
Osinska 1989		27	0.54	42	0.00	48	0.06	36	0.06	57	0.05	47	0.05
Perlemuter 1992		51	0.45	61	0.00	63	0.04	56	0.04	48	0.05	54	0.04
Poblocka 1999		22	0.55	32	0.00	34	0.09	34	0.09	41	0.06	41	0.07
Rangell 2001		7	0.61	3	0.05	8	0.26	8	0.60	13	0.63	4	0.61
Richter 1960		5	0.62	2	0.12	3	0.39	5	0.66	13	0.59	3	0.62
Richter 1961		57	0.40	33	0.00	60	0.03	61	0.03	59	0.04	64	0.03
Rosen 1989		14	0.57	16	0.00	9	0.21	9	0.53	16	0.58	5	0.55
Rubinstein 1939		40	0.50	21	0.00	51	0.07	35	0.07	54	0.04	48	0.05
Rubinstein 1952		47	0.47	49	0.00	32	0.06	33	0.14	47	0.06	37	0.09
Rubinstein 1966		29	0.54	24	0.00	13	0.11	13	0.41	43	0.06	22	0.16
Rudanovskaya 2007		6	0.61	10	0.01	10	0.09	14	0.41	18	0.38	12	0.39
Shebanova 2002		32	0.53	8	0.01	26	0.06	26	0.23	38	0.07	32	0.13
Smith 1975		19	0.55	26	0.00	18	0.08	16	0.35	16	0.44	11	0.39
Sztompka 1959		56	0.40	25	0.00	64	0.03	64	0.03	48	0.06	58	0.04
Tanyel 1992		52	0.44	56	0.00	50	0.06	42	0.06	30	0.19	34	0.11
Tsujii 2005		2	0.65	6	0.02	4	0.23	3	0.68	18	0.37	9	0.50
Uninsky 1959		16	0.56	11	0.01	22	0.08	17	0.33	29	0.18	17	0.24
Vardi 1988		37	0.51	15	0.00	17	0.07	18	0.33	28	0.19	16	0.25
Wasowski 1980		31	0.53	39	0.00	19	0.08	19	0.30	8	0.59	10	0.42
Zimerman 1975		60	0.38	29	0.00	59	0.03	62	0.03	60	0.04	66	0.03
Average		1	0.73	1	0.60	1	0.59	1	0.87	39	0.08	15	0.26
Random 1		66	0.05	65	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	9	0.38	36	0.09
Random 2		65	0.09	30	0.00	66	0.02	66	0.02	41	0.05	65	0.03
Random 3		67	0.00	62	0.00	67	0.01	67	0.01	43	0.04	67	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).