Kiepura 1999

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		64	0.21	52	0.00	36	0.05	55	0.05	36	0.08	46	0.06
Ax 1995		53	0.38	59	0.00	32	0.07	31	0.14	44	0.06	34	0.09
Bacha 1998		50	0.39	64	0.00	57	0.06	41	0.06	60	0.03	55	0.04
Barbosa 1983		49	0.40	8	0.02	7	0.20	7	0.57	22	0.41	8	0.48
BenOr 1989		21	0.49	29	0.00	24	0.10	19	0.39	34	0.11	19	0.21
Biret 1990		17	0.52	37	0.00	20	0.08	16	0.44	36	0.07	22	0.18
Brailowsky 1960		56	0.34	12	0.01	51	0.07	39	0.07	50	0.05	43	0.06
Chiu 1999		25	0.48	19	0.00	38	0.06	46	0.06	47	0.06	44	0.06
Clidat 1994		34	0.47	10	0.01	30	0.08	30	0.16	51	0.06	30	0.10
Cohen 1997		33	0.47	25	0.00	17	0.07	20	0.36	5	0.71	5	0.51
Cortot 1951		47	0.41	65	0.00	55	0.06	48	0.06	62	0.03	58	0.04
Csalog 1996		32	0.47	48	0.00	47	0.09	35	0.09	46	0.06	35	0.07
Czerny 1989		24	0.49	18	0.00	11	0.14	11	0.52	34	0.09	16	0.22
Ezaki 2006		27	0.48	15	0.01	12	0.13	13	0.51	34	0.09	18	0.21
Falvay 1989		19	0.51	32	0.00	23	0.10	22	0.34	52	0.05	25	0.13
Fiorentino 1962		1	0.69	1	0.67	1	0.66	1	0.85	2	0.73	1	0.79
Fliere 1977		43	0.42	54	0.00	50	0.06	51	0.06	55	0.04	48	0.05
Fou 1978		22	0.49	6	0.03	10	0.19	10	0.54	28	0.21	12	0.34
Francois 1956		54	0.37	38	0.00	62	0.02	63	0.02	61	0.03	66	0.02
Goldenweiser 1946		31	0.47	56	0.00	45	0.06	45	0.06	40	0.06	42	0.06
Gornostaeva 1994		57	0.33	42	0.00	41	0.07	40	0.07	32	0.18	28	0.11
Groot 1988		9	0.55	5	0.03	15	0.07	23	0.34	41	0.06	24	0.14
Hatto 1993		40	0.43	21	0.00	19	0.07	28	0.21	43	0.06	29	0.11
Hatto 1997		38	0.43	36	0.00	35	0.06	49	0.06	56	0.04	51	0.05
Horszowski 1983		37	0.44	45	0.00	43	0.08	36	0.08	43	0.05	41	0.06
Indjic 2001		35	0.46	11	0.01	29	0.09	29	0.19	56	0.04	33	0.09
Katin 1996		3	0.59	16	0.01	9	0.26	6	0.66	30	0.23	11	0.39
Kiepura 1999		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Korecka 1992		4	0.59	2	0.07	4	0.25	3	0.72	2	0.75	2	0.73
Kushner 1990		60	0.30	53	0.00	56	0.05	56	0.05	65	0.02	60	0.03
Lilamand 2001		39	0.43	30	0.00	49	0.08	37	0.08	59	0.03	50	0.05
Luisada 1990		52	0.38	66	0.00	42	0.06	42	0.06	55	0.05	52	0.05
Luisada 2008		62	0.28	67	0.00	64	0.02	66	0.02	66	0.02	62	0.02
Lushtak 2004		10	0.55	40	0.00	13	0.08	14	0.48	34	0.08	20	0.20
Malcuzynski 1951		61	0.29	60	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	65	0.02	64	0.02
Malcuzynski 1961		26	0.48	31	0.00	33	0.06	33	0.11	41	0.07	31	0.09
Magaloff 1977		55	0.36	63	0.00	52	0.04	57	0.04	60	0.04	57	0.04
Magin 1975		6	0.59	3	0.04	3	0.31	4	0.69	17	0.42	4	0.54
Meguri 1997		7	0.58	33	0.00	14	0.09	12	0.51	16	0.48	7	0.49
Milkina 1970		20	0.50	22	0.00	25	0.10	26	0.24	34	0.10	23	0.15
Mohovich 1999		5	0.59	7	0.02	6	0.18	5	0.69	22	0.44	3	0.55
Nezu 2005		18	0.51	50	0.00	48	0.10	34	0.10	52	0.05	40	0.07
Ohlsson 1999		16	0.52	28	0.00	18	0.08	15	0.48	30	0.19	13	0.30
Olejniczak 1990		12	0.54	27	0.00	27	0.11	21	0.34	26	0.21	15	0.27
Osinska 1989		15	0.53	55	0.00	34	0.05	52	0.05	53	0.05	49	0.05
Perlemuter 1992		44	0.42	24	0.00	58	0.04	58	0.04	60	0.03	59	0.03
Poblocka 1999		42	0.43	51	0.00	53	0.05	54	0.05	59	0.04	53	0.04
Rangell 2001		36	0.45	39	0.00	44	0.06	44	0.06	36	0.07	47	0.06
Richter 1960		28	0.48	26	0.00	46	0.08	38	0.08	39	0.06	36	0.07
Richter 1961		11	0.54	13	0.01	5	0.17	9	0.55	21	0.44	6	0.49
Rosen 1989		8	0.57	9	0.01	16	0.07	17	0.41	25	0.44	10	0.42
Rubinstein 1939		51	0.38	57	0.00	37	0.06	50	0.06	59	0.03	54	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		59	0.32	61	0.00	61	0.03	60	0.03	64	0.02	65	0.02
Rubinstein 1966		23	0.49	17	0.00	21	0.08	18	0.39	35	0.08	21	0.18
Rudanovskaya 2007		13	0.53	58	0.00	28	0.10	27	0.23	34	0.07	26	0.13
Shebanova 2002		29	0.47	14	0.01	31	0.06	32	0.12	54	0.04	37	0.07
Smith 1975		58	0.32	62	0.00	63	0.03	62	0.03	65	0.02	61	0.02
Sztompka 1959		48	0.41	43	0.00	39	0.06	47	0.06	33	0.15	32	0.09
Tanyel 1992		46	0.41	20	0.00	40	0.06	43	0.06	39	0.08	39	0.07
Tsujii 2005		14	0.53	46	0.00	26	0.10	25	0.27	58	0.05	27	0.12
Uninsky 1959		41	0.43	41	0.00	54	0.05	53	0.05	61	0.03	56	0.04
Vardi 1988		45	0.41	23	0.00	8	0.18	8	0.55	21	0.35	9	0.44
Wasowski 1980		63	0.23	47	0.00	67	0.01	67	0.01	66	0.02	67	0.01
Zimerman 1975		30	0.47	49	0.00	22	0.07	24	0.32	28	0.26	14	0.29
Average		2	0.65	4	0.03	2	0.27	2	0.79	51	0.06	17	0.22
Random 1		65	0.05	34	0.00	59	0.03	59	0.03	24	0.13	45	0.06
Random 2		66	0.00	35	0.00	60	0.03	61	0.03	29	0.15	38	0.07
Random 3		67	-0.07	44	0.00	66	0.02	64	0.02	60	0.03	63	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).