Gornostaeva 1994

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		64	0.12	56	0.00	43	0.06	45	0.06	52	0.05	49	0.05
Ax 1995		62	0.20	52	0.00	58	0.04	59	0.04	63	0.02	60	0.03
Bacha 1998		45	0.33	44	0.00	35	0.08	38	0.08	37	0.06	36	0.07
Barbosa 1983		31	0.40	24	0.00	13	0.09	14	0.50	32	0.17	10	0.29
BenOr 1989		1	0.55	1	0.34	1	0.33	3	0.69	22	0.41	2	0.53
Biret 1990		30	0.40	32	0.00	34	0.08	35	0.08	50	0.05	42	0.06
Brailowsky 1960		53	0.27	31	0.00	54	0.05	54	0.05	57	0.04	50	0.04
Chiu 1999		51	0.30	66	0.00	53	0.07	42	0.07	62	0.04	45	0.05
Clidat 1994		54	0.26	55	0.00	55	0.06	50	0.06	62	0.03	54	0.04
Cohen 1997		55	0.25	38	0.00	42	0.05	53	0.05	29	0.28	29	0.12
Cortot 1951		6	0.51	8	0.03	11	0.18	8	0.58	10	0.39	3	0.48
Csalog 1996		12	0.48	46	0.00	16	0.13	13	0.52	49	0.05	20	0.16
Czerny 1989		8	0.50	14	0.01	4	0.18	7	0.61	31	0.19	8	0.34
Ezaki 2006		27	0.41	7	0.04	24	0.12	24	0.33	44	0.06	24	0.14
Falvay 1989		4	0.51	13	0.01	5	0.18	5	0.63	53	0.05	17	0.18
Fiorentino 1962		21	0.44	43	0.00	20	0.08	17	0.48	38	0.08	16	0.20
Fliere 1977		17	0.46	22	0.00	18	0.10	20	0.47	25	0.20	9	0.31
Fou 1978		2	0.55	4	0.07	3	0.26	2	0.70	22	0.29	4	0.45
Francois 1956		50	0.30	30	0.00	56	0.05	58	0.05	54	0.04	58	0.04
Goldenweiser 1946		38	0.39	18	0.01	38	0.07	40	0.07	59	0.04	44	0.05
Gornostaeva 1994		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Groot 1988		32	0.40	57	0.00	28	0.08	25	0.32	54	0.05	28	0.13
Hatto 1993		13	0.47	50	0.00	19	0.09	22	0.41	55	0.05	26	0.14
Hatto 1997		18	0.45	58	0.00	23	0.13	21	0.43	57	0.04	27	0.13
Horszowski 1983		40	0.36	36	0.00	29	0.08	28	0.27	55	0.04	31	0.10
Indjic 2001		9	0.49	48	0.00	15	0.10	11	0.54	47	0.05	21	0.16
Katin 1996		34	0.40	64	0.00	44	0.05	52	0.05	65	0.03	52	0.04
Kiepura 1999		46	0.33	47	0.00	32	0.08	32	0.18	40	0.07	30	0.11
Korecka 1992		5	0.51	6	0.04	8	0.17	4	0.67	11	0.61	1	0.64
Kushner 1990		37	0.39	28	0.00	36	0.07	41	0.07	42	0.06	39	0.06
Lilamand 2001		47	0.32	59	0.00	49	0.08	36	0.08	57	0.04	40	0.06
Luisada 1990		10	0.48	26	0.00	14	0.10	10	0.55	37	0.08	14	0.21
Luisada 2008		28	0.41	20	0.00	31	0.08	31	0.19	52	0.05	32	0.10
Lushtak 2004		14	0.46	10	0.02	9	0.15	19	0.48	31	0.13	12	0.25
Malcuzynski 1951		26	0.43	40	0.00	26	0.08	27	0.28	25	0.29	11	0.28
Malcuzynski 1961		22	0.44	5	0.06	6	0.16	12	0.53	45	0.06	18	0.18
Magaloff 1977		24	0.43	19	0.01	33	0.08	33	0.15	59	0.04	35	0.08
Magin 1975		16	0.46	41	0.00	22	0.14	18	0.48	56	0.05	22	0.15
Meguri 1997		43	0.34	39	0.00	48	0.06	46	0.06	54	0.04	47	0.05
Milkina 1970		33	0.40	51	0.00	40	0.10	34	0.10	51	0.05	37	0.07
Mohovich 1999		11	0.48	11	0.02	7	0.19	9	0.57	34	0.08	15	0.21
Nezu 2005		35	0.39	53	0.00	46	0.05	51	0.05	62	0.03	56	0.04
Ohlsson 1999		63	0.19	45	0.00	66	0.02	66	0.02	66	0.02	65	0.02
Olejniczak 1990		20	0.44	16	0.01	17	0.10	15	0.49	24	0.25	6	0.35
Osinska 1989		23	0.44	37	0.00	21	0.10	23	0.38	33	0.14	13	0.23
Perlemuter 1992		57	0.24	27	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	65	0.02	62	0.02
Poblocka 1999		39	0.37	17	0.01	47	0.06	49	0.06	62	0.03	51	0.04
Rangell 2001		52	0.27	62	0.00	57	0.05	56	0.05	64	0.03	57	0.04
Richter 1960		41	0.36	34	0.00	45	0.05	55	0.05	57	0.05	48	0.05
Richter 1961		15	0.46	9	0.02	12	0.11	16	0.49	31	0.23	7	0.34
Rosen 1989		59	0.23	63	0.00	62	0.03	60	0.03	63	0.02	66	0.02
Rubinstein 1939		49	0.30	12	0.01	52	0.07	43	0.07	61	0.03	46	0.05
Rubinstein 1952		48	0.31	49	0.00	41	0.07	44	0.07	44	0.06	43	0.06
Rubinstein 1966		42	0.36	15	0.01	30	0.09	30	0.23	61	0.03	34	0.08
Rudanovskaya 2007		25	0.43	42	0.00	39	0.08	37	0.08	48	0.05	41	0.06
Shebanova 2002		44	0.33	54	0.00	50	0.06	48	0.06	62	0.03	53	0.04
Smith 1975		60	0.23	60	0.00	64	0.02	64	0.02	66	0.02	63	0.02
Sztompka 1959		36	0.39	25	0.00	37	0.07	39	0.07	41	0.06	38	0.06
Tanyel 1992		61	0.21	67	0.00	59	0.05	57	0.05	58	0.04	55	0.04
Tsujii 2005		19	0.45	29	0.00	27	0.09	29	0.25	59	0.04	33	0.10
Uninsky 1959		58	0.24	65	0.00	61	0.02	63	0.02	66	0.02	64	0.02
Vardi 1988		7	0.50	3	0.07	10	0.14	6	0.61	27	0.20	5	0.35
Wasowski 1980		56	0.24	23	0.00	60	0.02	62	0.02	61	0.03	61	0.02
Zimerman 1975		29	0.40	21	0.00	25	0.07	26	0.29	39	0.07	25	0.14
Average		3	0.55	2	0.17	2	0.28	1	0.75	59	0.04	19	0.17
Random 1		67	-0.01	33	0.00	67	0.01	67	0.01	48	0.04	67	0.02
Random 2		65	0.10	35	0.00	51	0.06	47	0.06	15	0.40	23	0.15
Random 3		66	0.00	61	0.00	63	0.03	61	0.03	44	0.04	59	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).