Malcuzynski 1961

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		63	0.28	28	0.00	31	0.07	31	0.14	24	0.37	31	0.23
Ax 1995		62	0.37	40	0.00	58	0.04	57	0.04	51	0.04	66	0.04
Bacha 1998		49	0.48	49	0.00	38	0.07	36	0.07	10	0.43	36	0.17
Barbosa 1983		46	0.50	2	0.20	2	0.27	13	0.50	11	0.59	10	0.54
BenOr 1989		15	0.60	6	0.04	7	0.17	7	0.55	12	0.54	12	0.54
Biret 1990		42	0.53	65	0.00	45	0.06	43	0.06	34	0.09	51	0.07
Brailowsky 1960		61	0.41	33	0.00	57	0.04	58	0.04	36	0.08	54	0.06
Chiu 1999		14	0.60	19	0.01	15	0.17	14	0.50	6	0.58	9	0.54
Clidat 1994		54	0.46	58	0.00	54	0.05	50	0.05	34	0.08	58	0.06
Cohen 1997		60	0.42	45	0.00	51	0.05	52	0.05	8	0.60	38	0.17
Cortot 1951		33	0.55	51	0.00	47	0.07	39	0.07	15	0.27	41	0.14
Csalog 1996		1	0.66	1	0.22	1	0.22	3	0.58	6	0.55	7	0.56
Czerny 1989		23	0.59	7	0.04	11	0.21	10	0.52	14	0.51	14	0.51
Ezaki 2006		38	0.53	42	0.00	32	0.06	32	0.12	29	0.21	39	0.16
Falvay 1989		6	0.62	13	0.01	17	0.10	20	0.44	30	0.17	28	0.27
Fiorentino 1962		31	0.58	27	0.00	36	0.07	41	0.07	44	0.07	50	0.07
Fliere 1977		37	0.53	62	0.00	46	0.07	37	0.07	37	0.07	47	0.07
Fou 1978		7	0.62	8	0.03	3	0.15	5	0.58	5	0.62	3	0.60
Francois 1956		57	0.44	48	0.00	61	0.03	60	0.03	35	0.08	62	0.05
Goldenweiser 1946		21	0.60	32	0.00	21	0.10	16	0.47	10	0.48	18	0.47
Gornostaeva 1994		56	0.44	38	0.00	37	0.06	44	0.06	11	0.53	35	0.18
Groot 1988		2	0.64	5	0.04	10	0.17	1	0.59	7	0.57	5	0.58
Hatto 1993		9	0.61	31	0.00	22	0.11	19	0.44	19	0.43	21	0.43
Hatto 1997		16	0.60	36	0.00	23	0.17	17	0.46	16	0.43	19	0.44
Horszowski 1983		24	0.59	12	0.01	6	0.18	8	0.54	2	0.67	2	0.60
Indjic 2001		17	0.60	46	0.00	27	0.07	25	0.30	21	0.38	24	0.34
Katin 1996		8	0.61	59	0.00	20	0.09	22	0.43	23	0.36	23	0.39
Kiepura 1999		50	0.48	50	0.00	50	0.07	40	0.07	32	0.11	44	0.09
Korecka 1992		52	0.47	60	0.00	62	0.03	63	0.03	49	0.05	63	0.04
Kushner 1990		43	0.53	20	0.01	35	0.07	38	0.07	12	0.45	33	0.18
Lilamand 2001		3	0.63	21	0.01	4	0.23	2	0.59	3	0.73	1	0.66
Luisada 1990		30	0.58	30	0.00	8	0.13	11	0.51	14	0.51	15	0.51
Luisada 2008		48	0.49	16	0.01	40	0.09	34	0.09	17	0.37	34	0.18
Lushtak 2004		27	0.58	15	0.01	25	0.11	26	0.24	23	0.28	30	0.26
Malcuzynski 1951		19	0.60	18	0.01	12	0.19	12	0.51	3	0.64	6	0.57
Malcuzynski 1961		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Magaloff 1977		20	0.60	41	0.00	18	0.10	18	0.46	5	0.63	11	0.54
Magin 1975		12	0.61	4	0.07	13	0.20	9	0.53	7	0.51	13	0.52
Meguri 1997		40	0.53	17	0.01	55	0.04	54	0.04	35	0.08	57	0.06
Milkina 1970		10	0.61	14	0.01	28	0.08	27	0.21	17	0.38	27	0.28
Mohovich 1999		26	0.58	43	0.00	14	0.16	15	0.49	18	0.49	17	0.49
Nezu 2005		41	0.53	64	0.00	56	0.04	55	0.04	49	0.05	65	0.04
Ohlsson 1999		44	0.50	47	0.00	42	0.08	35	0.08	37	0.07	49	0.07
Olejniczak 1990		25	0.58	22	0.00	26	0.06	30	0.16	9	0.45	29	0.27
Osinska 1989		5	0.62	25	0.00	29	0.09	28	0.19	22	0.40	26	0.28
Perlemuter 1992		53	0.46	23	0.00	63	0.03	61	0.03	32	0.12	53	0.06
Poblocka 1999		32	0.57	35	0.00	41	0.06	45	0.06	37	0.07	55	0.06
Rangell 2001		45	0.50	54	0.00	53	0.04	53	0.04	32	0.16	46	0.08
Richter 1960		4	0.63	11	0.01	9	0.15	6	0.56	8	0.64	4	0.60
Richter 1961		47	0.50	29	0.00	48	0.06	46	0.06	40	0.07	56	0.06
Rosen 1989		35	0.54	61	0.00	49	0.07	42	0.07	26	0.41	37	0.17
Rubinstein 1939		36	0.54	34	0.00	34	0.05	51	0.05	22	0.35	42	0.13
Rubinstein 1952		29	0.58	24	0.00	16	0.10	21	0.43	4	0.61	16	0.51
Rubinstein 1966		13	0.60	3	0.12	5	0.17	4	0.58	11	0.54	8	0.56
Rudanovskaya 2007		22	0.59	9	0.02	33	0.06	48	0.06	15	0.41	40	0.16
Shebanova 2002		18	0.60	10	0.02	19	0.10	24	0.37	19	0.43	22	0.40
Smith 1975		34	0.55	55	0.00	39	0.09	33	0.09	17	0.42	32	0.19
Sztompka 1959		39	0.53	52	0.00	30	0.09	29	0.17	13	0.48	25	0.29
Tanyel 1992		59	0.43	56	0.00	59	0.03	62	0.03	44	0.07	61	0.05
Tsujii 2005		28	0.58	26	0.00	43	0.06	49	0.06	46	0.06	59	0.06
Uninsky 1959		11	0.61	37	0.00	24	0.15	23	0.41	11	0.46	20	0.43
Vardi 1988		51	0.48	39	0.00	44	0.06	47	0.06	38	0.08	48	0.07
Wasowski 1980		58	0.44	53	0.00	60	0.03	59	0.03	32	0.13	52	0.06
Zimerman 1975		55	0.46	44	0.00	52	0.04	56	0.04	36	0.09	60	0.06
Random 1		64	0.08	57	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	12	0.29	45	0.08
Random 2		65	0.05	66	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	27	0.17	64	0.04
Random 3		66	0.04	63	0.00	64	0.03	64	0.03	3	0.54	43	0.13

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).