Barbosa 1983

Performance0-Rank  0-Score1-Rank  1-Score2-Rank  2-Score3-Rank  3-Score3R-Rank  3R-Score4-Rank  4-Score  NED
Ashkenazy 1981   35  0.379  0.0227  0.1226  0.2820  0.4525  0.35
Ax 1995   20  0.445  0.0320  0.1023  0.3617  0.4521  0.40
Bacha 1998   47  0.3118  0.0131  0.0732  0.1512  0.4129  0.25
Barbosa 1983   target  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  target
BenOr 1989   30  0.4040  0.0034  0.0845  0.0838  0.0844  0.08
Biret 1990   29  0.4032  0.0039  0.0746  0.0730  0.1540  0.10
Brailowsky 1960   53  0.2831  0.0050  0.0747  0.0730  0.1934  0.12
Chiu 1999   32  0.3829  0.0018  0.1520  0.4418  0.3619  0.40
Clidat 1994   3  0.492  0.098  0.1017  0.546  0.594  0.56
Cohen 1997   63  0.1157  0.0062  0.0362  0.0351  0.0465  0.03
Cortot 1951   43  0.3456  0.0046  0.0936  0.0912  0.3031  0.16
Csalog 1996   4  0.497  0.0210  0.111  0.6724  0.3417  0.48
Czerny 1989   7  0.4727  0.0019  0.1018  0.4624  0.3023  0.37
Ezaki 2006   5  0.494  0.0612  0.124  0.6216  0.4510  0.53
Falvay 1989   10  0.4619  0.0117  0.179  0.6026  0.2322  0.37
Fiorentino 1962   16  0.4511  0.0214  0.1313  0.5918  0.4315  0.50
Fliere 1977   42  0.3451  0.0035  0.0749  0.0722  0.2433  0.13
Fou 1978   8  0.4721  0.014  0.176  0.6113  0.4413  0.52
Francois 1956   61  0.1944  0.0061  0.0459  0.0443  0.0660  0.05
Goldenweiser 1946   14  0.4515  0.0115  0.1416  0.549  0.5111  0.52
Gornostaeva 1994   26  0.4014  0.0132  0.0931  0.1713  0.5027  0.29
Groot 1988   33  0.3852  0.0038  0.0839  0.0836  0.0845  0.08
Hatto 1993   9  0.4648  0.006  0.135  0.6114  0.489  0.54
Hatto 1997   15  0.4510  0.023  0.137  0.6113  0.478  0.54
Horszowski 1983   13  0.456  0.022  0.193  0.6310  0.602  0.61
Indjic 2001   18  0.4459  0.0013  0.1012  0.5916  0.4514  0.52
Katin 1996   24  0.408  0.0225  0.0925  0.3327  0.2826  0.30
Kiepura 1999   25  0.4020  0.0122  0.1021  0.416  0.5716  0.48
Korecka 1992   22  0.4226  0.0026  0.0927  0.287  0.6718  0.43
Kushner 1990   49  0.3060  0.0049  0.0935  0.0951  0.0547  0.07
Lilamand 2001   50  0.3064  0.0045  0.0841  0.0846  0.0649  0.07
Luisada 1990   31  0.3849  0.0030  0.0728  0.2355  0.0538  0.11
Luisada 2008   54  0.2858  0.0053  0.0555  0.0538  0.0657  0.05
Lushtak 2004   27  0.4046  0.0037  0.0934  0.0942  0.0650  0.07
Malcuzynski 1951   56  0.2730  0.0054  0.0457  0.0435  0.0759  0.05
Malcuzynski 1961   2  0.501  0.491  0.4811  0.5913  0.507  0.54
Magaloff 1977   51  0.2965  0.0052  0.0653  0.0657  0.0458  0.05
Magin 1975   11  0.4641  0.007  0.1214  0.5713  0.4712  0.52
Meguri 1997   48  0.3150  0.0051  0.0750  0.0738  0.0748  0.07
Milkina 1970   34  0.3853  0.0036  0.0843  0.0824  0.1735  0.12
Mohovich 1999   12  0.4616  0.015  0.148  0.6016  0.525  0.56
Nezu 2005   52  0.2933  0.0056  0.0554  0.0556  0.0461  0.04
Ohlsson 1999   41  0.3543  0.0041  0.0748  0.0730  0.1737  0.11
Olejniczak 1990   38  0.3712  0.0229  0.0729  0.1914  0.4028  0.28
Osinska 1989   44  0.3339  0.0047  0.0938  0.0934  0.0742  0.08
Perlemuter 1992   60  0.2163  0.0060  0.0361  0.0333  0.0755  0.05
Poblocka 1999   37  0.3737  0.0043  0.0842  0.0841  0.0646  0.07
Rangell 2001   58  0.2454  0.0059  0.0458  0.0458  0.0463  0.04
Richter 1960   39  0.3662  0.0042  0.0651  0.0643  0.0652  0.06
Richter 1961   6  0.4822  0.0111  0.112  0.667  0.591  0.62
Rosen 1989   59  0.2261  0.0058  0.0460  0.0450  0.0562  0.04
Rubinstein 1939   23  0.4134  0.0024  0.1024  0.3621  0.3524  0.35
Rubinstein 1952   46  0.3242  0.0044  0.1033  0.1033  0.0941  0.09
Rubinstein 1966   17  0.4424  0.0021  0.0919  0.4432  0.1430  0.25
Rudanovskaya 2007   45  0.3345  0.0048  0.0937  0.0927  0.1736  0.12
Shebanova 2002   36  0.3725  0.0040  0.0844  0.0849  0.0553  0.06
Smith 1975   55  0.2766  0.0055  0.0556  0.0553  0.0556  0.05
Sztompka 1959   19  0.4423  0.0016  0.1815  0.557  0.593  0.57
Tanyel 1992   57  0.2655  0.0057  0.0652  0.0633  0.1143  0.08
Tsujii 2005   28  0.4017  0.0128  0.1030  0.1841  0.0739  0.11
Uninsky 1959   40  0.3628  0.0033  0.0840  0.0825  0.2532  0.14
Vardi 1988   1  0.503  0.079  0.1110  0.6015  0.506  0.55
Wasowski 1980   62  0.1447  0.0063  0.0363  0.0358  0.0464  0.03
Zimerman 1975   21  0.4313  0.0223  0.1022  0.3720  0.4420  0.40
Random 1   64  0.0435  0.0065  0.0264  0.0215  0.2651  0.07
Random 2   66  0.0038  0.0066  0.0166  0.0143  0.0466  0.02
Random 3   65  0.0336  0.0064  0.0265  0.0222  0.2154  0.06

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

  • Performance:
  • 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
  • 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
  • 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
  • NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

  • red = strongly similar performance to target
  • orange = moderately similar performance
  • yellow = weakly similar performance
  • green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
  • white = dissimilar to target
  • blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).