Sztompka 1959

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		28	0.79	39	0.00	27	0.07	26	0.20	60	0.03	32	0.08
Ax 1995		39	0.78	4	0.06	15	0.08	22	0.23	17	0.27	11	0.25
Bacha 1998		47	0.75	25	0.00	47	0.09	35	0.09	49	0.05	35	0.07
Barbosa 1983		45	0.76	6	0.03	4	0.19	8	0.49	11	0.51	4	0.50
BenOr 1989		21	0.81	59	0.00	33	0.05	34	0.09	47	0.06	36	0.07
Biret 1990		26	0.80	21	0.01	43	0.05	47	0.05	51	0.05	49	0.05
Brailowsky 1960		46	0.75	33	0.00	46	0.10	32	0.10	52	0.05	34	0.07
Chiu 1999		31	0.79	44	0.00	41	0.07	39	0.07	57	0.04	42	0.05
Clidat 1994		58	0.69	12	0.01	53	0.05	55	0.05	62	0.03	55	0.04
Cohen 1997		64	0.54	65	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	61	0.03	67	0.02
Cortot 1951		55	0.71	55	0.00	51	0.05	45	0.05	53	0.04	60	0.04
Csalog 1996		34	0.79	24	0.00	36	0.05	46	0.05	57	0.04	53	0.04
Czerny 1989		48	0.74	61	0.00	42	0.07	36	0.07	40	0.05	37	0.06
Ezaki 2006		13	0.82	34	0.00	35	0.05	52	0.05	24	0.23	25	0.11
Falvay 1989		15	0.82	8	0.02	38	0.06	43	0.06	63	0.03	52	0.04
Fiorentino 1962		40	0.78	56	0.00	57	0.06	41	0.06	63	0.03	58	0.04
Fliere 1977		8	0.85	58	0.00	11	0.09	10	0.41	33	0.12	15	0.22
Fou 1978		32	0.79	5	0.05	10	0.09	16	0.31	24	0.23	8	0.27
Francois 1956		54	0.72	19	0.01	52	0.05	53	0.05	37	0.07	41	0.06
Goldenweiser 1946		53	0.72	11	0.01	19	0.09	17	0.31	45	0.06	21	0.14
Gornostaeva 1994		30	0.79	41	0.00	39	0.06	42	0.06	50	0.04	48	0.05
Groot 1988		11	0.83	60	0.00	25	0.06	25	0.21	55	0.04	29	0.09
Hatto 1993		3	0.88	16	0.01	3	0.20	3	0.64	11	0.47	3	0.55
Hatto 1997		4	0.87	2	0.12	2	0.25	2	0.66	11	0.46	2	0.55
Horszowski 1983		42	0.77	22	0.01	12	0.11	18	0.30	47	0.06	23	0.13
Indjic 2001		5	0.87	47	0.00	5	0.23	4	0.62	14	0.41	5	0.50
Katin 1996		14	0.82	45	0.00	37	0.05	48	0.05	45	0.06	44	0.05
Kiepura 1999		63	0.62	52	0.00	59	0.04	61	0.04	44	0.05	50	0.04
Korecka 1992		33	0.79	26	0.00	28	0.10	24	0.22	30	0.16	16	0.19
Kushner 1990		61	0.67	40	0.00	48	0.05	50	0.05	41	0.06	45	0.05
Lilamand 2001		56	0.71	10	0.02	31	0.05	29	0.12	9	0.45	14	0.23
Luisada 1990		22	0.80	54	0.00	24	0.06	27	0.20	45	0.05	28	0.10
Luisada 2008		23	0.80	64	0.00	26	0.06	28	0.15	55	0.04	30	0.08
Lushtak 2004		37	0.78	51	0.00	50	0.06	44	0.06	47	0.05	46	0.05
Malcuzynski 1951		59	0.68	9	0.02	23	0.08	21	0.25	15	0.24	12	0.24
Malcuzynski 1961		38	0.78	18	0.01	9	0.09	11	0.40	38	0.06	19	0.15
Magaloff 1977		7	0.85	14	0.01	8	0.22	7	0.49	29	0.15	9	0.27
Magin 1975		1	0.89	1	0.41	1	0.40	1	0.71	2	0.56	1	0.63
Meguri 1997		43	0.76	48	0.00	55	0.04	56	0.04	59	0.03	63	0.03
Milkina 1970		17	0.82	13	0.01	13	0.13	9	0.41	30	0.16	10	0.26
Mohovich 1999		50	0.73	38	0.00	56	0.05	54	0.05	64	0.03	57	0.04
Nezu 2005		29	0.79	17	0.01	30	0.05	31	0.10	50	0.04	39	0.06
Ohlsson 1999		6	0.86	3	0.07	6	0.23	6	0.52	20	0.38	6	0.44
Olejniczak 1990		10	0.84	30	0.00	18	0.09	20	0.26	49	0.05	27	0.11
Osinska 1989		16	0.82	29	0.00	29	0.05	30	0.11	57	0.04	33	0.07
Perlemuter 1992		18	0.82	42	0.00	22	0.10	23	0.23	6	0.36	7	0.29
Poblocka 1999		19	0.81	15	0.01	34	0.05	49	0.05	60	0.04	51	0.04
Rangell 2001		44	0.76	43	0.00	54	0.04	58	0.04	55	0.04	59	0.04
Richter 1960		57	0.70	66	0.00	60	0.04	60	0.04	47	0.05	54	0.04
Richter 1961		62	0.66	57	0.00	62	0.04	59	0.04	62	0.03	61	0.03
Rosen 1989		36	0.78	62	0.00	32	0.05	33	0.10	44	0.06	31	0.08
Rubinstein 1939		49	0.74	36	0.00	45	0.06	40	0.06	58	0.04	43	0.05
Rubinstein 1952		41	0.77	20	0.01	20	0.09	15	0.32	36	0.09	17	0.17
Rubinstein 1966		27	0.80	31	0.00	40	0.07	37	0.07	48	0.05	38	0.06
Rudanovskaya 2007		51	0.73	35	0.00	63	0.03	63	0.03	64	0.02	66	0.02
Shebanova 2002		20	0.81	63	0.00	21	0.10	12	0.38	39	0.07	18	0.16
Smith 1975		9	0.84	27	0.00	17	0.10	13	0.38	32	0.14	13	0.23
Sztompka 1959		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Tanyel 1992		52	0.72	67	0.00	58	0.04	57	0.04	64	0.03	64	0.03
Tsujii 2005		25	0.80	50	0.00	49	0.05	51	0.05	65	0.03	56	0.04
Uninsky 1959		12	0.82	46	0.00	16	0.07	19	0.29	34	0.07	22	0.14
Vardi 1988		60	0.68	23	0.01	61	0.03	62	0.03	63	0.03	62	0.03
Wasowski 1980		35	0.79	37	0.00	14	0.09	14	0.35	53	0.05	24	0.13
Zimerman 1975		24	0.80	28	0.00	44	0.07	38	0.07	60	0.04	47	0.05
Average		2	0.89	7	0.03	7	0.24	5	0.55	57	0.04	20	0.15
Random 1		67	-0.10	53	0.00	67	0.01	67	0.01	27	0.10	65	0.03
Random 2		66	0.12	32	0.00	66	0.02	66	0.02	1	0.60	26	0.11
Random 3		65	0.16	49	0.00	64	0.02	64	0.02	24	0.19	40	0.06

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).