Nezu 2005

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		24	0.82	10	0.02	13	0.11	8	0.46	28	0.20	18	0.30
Ax 1995		55	0.73	56	0.00	56	0.05	43	0.05	29	0.11	42	0.07
Bacha 1998		17	0.83	11	0.02	14	0.13	11	0.44	19	0.41	9	0.42
Barbosa 1983		61	0.67	47	0.00	53	0.05	45	0.05	42	0.07	45	0.06
BenOr 1989		43	0.78	66	0.00	45	0.04	53	0.04	62	0.04	62	0.04
Biret 1990		3	0.89	8	0.03	3	0.25	4	0.55	11	0.50	3	0.52
Brailowsky 1960		40	0.79	53	0.00	42	0.06	36	0.06	31	0.15	37	0.09
Chiu 1999		26	0.81	60	0.00	46	0.04	58	0.04	40	0.05	56	0.04
Clidat 1994		52	0.75	41	0.00	32	0.06	32	0.15	33	0.20	28	0.17
Cohen 1997		57	0.73	64	0.00	55	0.04	59	0.04	8	0.50	31	0.14
Cortot 1951		53	0.74	49	0.00	59	0.04	61	0.04	56	0.04	64	0.04
Csalog 1996		13	0.83	6	0.06	9	0.14	14	0.40	8	0.49	7	0.44
Czerny 1989		48	0.75	55	0.00	49	0.04	47	0.04	32	0.15	40	0.08
Ezaki 2006		46	0.77	17	0.01	57	0.04	49	0.04	43	0.06	47	0.05
Falvay 1989		7	0.85	30	0.00	17	0.07	20	0.32	27	0.18	23	0.24
Fiorentino 1962		16	0.83	19	0.01	26	0.09	18	0.33	16	0.36	13	0.34
Fliere 1977		34	0.80	61	0.00	41	0.04	57	0.04	34	0.09	43	0.06
Fou 1978		33	0.80	5	0.06	7	0.13	9	0.45	4	0.52	5	0.48
Francois 1956		59	0.71	26	0.01	58	0.04	62	0.04	36	0.07	54	0.05
Goldenweiser 1946		60	0.68	34	0.00	40	0.04	48	0.04	52	0.06	49	0.05
Gornostaeva 1994		41	0.78	22	0.01	47	0.04	52	0.04	44	0.05	61	0.04
Groot 1988		6	0.85	48	0.00	10	0.15	12	0.43	18	0.32	12	0.37
Hatto 1993		11	0.84	16	0.01	19	0.06	21	0.31	21	0.29	19	0.30
Hatto 1997		20	0.82	18	0.01	20	0.08	19	0.32	21	0.28	17	0.30
Horszowski 1983		44	0.78	38	0.00	35	0.05	44	0.05	32	0.12	38	0.08
Indjic 2001		18	0.83	29	0.00	22	0.10	23	0.30	27	0.23	22	0.26
Katin 1996		23	0.82	21	0.01	30	0.06	28	0.19	29	0.18	26	0.18
Kiepura 1999		62	0.67	42	0.00	61	0.05	46	0.05	38	0.06	48	0.05
Korecka 1992		39	0.79	12	0.02	48	0.04	60	0.04	29	0.17	39	0.08
Kushner 1990		51	0.75	27	0.00	34	0.05	42	0.05	20	0.28	33	0.12
Lilamand 2001		64	0.58	46	0.00	64	0.05	41	0.05	44	0.06	52	0.05
Luisada 1990		4	0.88	4	0.07	4	0.29	2	0.62	8	0.48	2	0.55
Luisada 2008		5	0.86	28	0.00	6	0.14	7	0.49	12	0.41	6	0.45
Lushtak 2004		21	0.82	35	0.00	38	0.05	37	0.05	62	0.04	58	0.04
Malcuzynski 1951		63	0.61	50	0.00	44	0.04	51	0.04	54	0.04	65	0.04
Malcuzynski 1961		32	0.81	39	0.00	21	0.08	26	0.27	28	0.18	25	0.22
Magaloff 1977		29	0.81	43	0.00	29	0.07	33	0.13	56	0.05	41	0.08
Magin 1975		27	0.81	32	0.00	39	0.06	34	0.06	45	0.05	51	0.05
Meguri 1997		22	0.82	23	0.01	23	0.09	22	0.31	4	0.52	10	0.40
Milkina 1970		36	0.80	25	0.01	28	0.08	30	0.16	25	0.19	27	0.17
Mohovich 1999		25	0.82	63	0.00	24	0.08	25	0.27	23	0.39	15	0.32
Nezu 2005		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Ohlsson 1999		28	0.81	45	0.00	18	0.07	27	0.22	45	0.06	34	0.11
Olejniczak 1990		8	0.85	14	0.01	11	0.12	10	0.45	13	0.43	8	0.44
Osinska 1989		10	0.85	3	0.10	5	0.12	6	0.50	21	0.21	14	0.32
Perlemuter 1992		50	0.75	36	0.00	43	0.04	55	0.04	38	0.05	55	0.04
Poblocka 1999		2	0.89	1	0.25	1	0.24	3	0.60	7	0.53	1	0.56
Rangell 2001		54	0.74	54	0.00	62	0.05	39	0.05	45	0.04	63	0.04
Richter 1960		47	0.76	57	0.00	54	0.05	40	0.05	39	0.06	53	0.05
Richter 1961		58	0.72	58	0.00	60	0.04	63	0.04	37	0.07	50	0.05
Rosen 1989		9	0.85	7	0.06	8	0.15	5	0.52	3	0.51	4	0.51
Rubinstein 1939		45	0.77	37	0.00	31	0.05	31	0.15	40	0.07	35	0.10
Rubinstein 1952		49	0.75	20	0.01	36	0.05	38	0.05	38	0.07	46	0.06
Rubinstein 1966		12	0.84	52	0.00	12	0.11	13	0.41	27	0.16	21	0.26
Rudanovskaya 2007		56	0.73	65	0.00	63	0.04	54	0.04	48	0.05	57	0.04
Shebanova 2002		37	0.79	44	0.00	33	0.09	29	0.17	49	0.06	36	0.10
Smith 1975		15	0.83	40	0.00	27	0.09	24	0.28	14	0.35	16	0.31
Sztompka 1959		38	0.79	13	0.01	52	0.04	50	0.04	31	0.10	44	0.06
Tanyel 1992		30	0.81	31	0.00	37	0.06	35	0.06	10	0.47	29	0.17
Tsujii 2005		14	0.83	9	0.02	16	0.07	15	0.40	30	0.14	24	0.24
Uninsky 1959		19	0.82	15	0.01	15	0.11	16	0.39	28	0.22	20	0.29
Vardi 1988		42	0.78	24	0.01	51	0.04	56	0.04	16	0.35	32	0.12
Wasowski 1980		31	0.81	33	0.00	25	0.08	17	0.34	46	0.06	30	0.14
Zimerman 1975		35	0.80	51	0.00	50	0.04	64	0.04	63	0.04	60	0.04
Average		1	0.90	2	0.11	2	0.17	1	0.66	27	0.22	11	0.38
Random 1		66	-0.05	62	0.00	66	0.02	66	0.02	39	0.04	66	0.03
Random 2		67	-0.11	67	0.00	67	0.01	67	0.01	67	0.01	67	0.01
Random 3		65	0.14	59	0.00	65	0.04	65	0.04	36	0.05	59	0.04

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).