Olejniczak 1990

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		30	0.84	6	0.08	8	0.10	9	0.46	16	0.33	13	0.39
Ax 1995		47	0.79	54	0.00	40	0.05	51	0.05	14	0.28	34	0.12
Bacha 1998		51	0.77	58	0.00	44	0.05	46	0.05	44	0.05	51	0.05
Barbosa 1983		56	0.73	20	0.01	41	0.05	43	0.05	33	0.09	44	0.07
BenOr 1989		3	0.90	7	0.08	3	0.12	3	0.55	1	0.64	1	0.59
Biret 1990		6	0.88	9	0.06	7	0.10	10	0.46	20	0.30	15	0.37
Brailowsky 1960		49	0.77	64	0.00	54	0.03	63	0.03	36	0.06	57	0.04
Chiu 1999		20	0.86	55	0.00	24	0.09	27	0.22	1	0.54	17	0.34
Clidat 1994		50	0.77	35	0.00	43	0.04	53	0.04	34	0.10	47	0.06
Cohen 1997		60	0.70	56	0.00	55	0.03	64	0.03	15	0.44	40	0.11
Cortot 1951		52	0.76	49	0.00	57	0.04	60	0.04	60	0.03	65	0.03
Csalog 1996		11	0.88	21	0.01	12	0.10	4	0.52	3	0.56	3	0.54
Czerny 1989		44	0.79	28	0.01	36	0.05	42	0.05	27	0.25	37	0.11
Ezaki 2006		40	0.81	60	0.00	53	0.05	41	0.05	24	0.23	35	0.11
Falvay 1989		22	0.85	29	0.00	42	0.04	52	0.04	49	0.05	58	0.04
Fiorentino 1962		10	0.88	37	0.00	29	0.08	31	0.14	25	0.21	27	0.17
Fliere 1977		5	0.89	14	0.02	18	0.09	20	0.32	15	0.36	16	0.34
Fou 1978		41	0.81	10	0.03	9	0.10	11	0.43	1	0.54	5	0.48
Francois 1956		61	0.70	50	0.00	63	0.05	49	0.05	48	0.05	56	0.05
Goldenweiser 1946		54	0.76	27	0.01	26	0.08	26	0.24	5	0.44	19	0.32
Gornostaeva 1994		38	0.82	42	0.00	37	0.06	37	0.06	14	0.37	28	0.15
Groot 1988		2	0.91	2	0.09	4	0.14	1	0.56	8	0.42	6	0.48
Hatto 1993		26	0.84	22	0.01	32	0.07	32	0.14	35	0.07	41	0.10
Hatto 1997		34	0.83	30	0.00	30	0.08	28	0.17	36	0.07	39	0.11
Horszowski 1983		46	0.79	15	0.01	20	0.08	24	0.28	9	0.28	23	0.28
Indjic 2001		29	0.84	38	0.00	33	0.08	33	0.08	39	0.07	45	0.07
Katin 1996		24	0.85	26	0.01	34	0.06	35	0.06	51	0.05	53	0.05
Kiepura 1999		63	0.64	47	0.00	61	0.03	62	0.03	47	0.04	62	0.03
Korecka 1992		53	0.76	61	0.00	58	0.04	54	0.04	51	0.05	59	0.04
Kushner 1990		57	0.72	45	0.00	47	0.06	38	0.06	33	0.08	43	0.07
Lilamand 2001		55	0.74	34	0.00	51	0.04	56	0.04	8	0.45	31	0.13
Luisada 1990		14	0.87	3	0.09	2	0.13	2	0.55	14	0.39	7	0.46
Luisada 2008		19	0.86	23	0.01	21	0.10	16	0.37	22	0.24	21	0.30
Lushtak 2004		4	0.89	5	0.08	5	0.13	5	0.49	5	0.58	4	0.53
Malcuzynski 1951		62	0.65	57	0.00	46	0.07	34	0.07	39	0.05	48	0.06
Malcuzynski 1961		45	0.79	44	0.00	13	0.09	17	0.33	49	0.05	30	0.13
Magaloff 1977		7	0.88	25	0.01	23	0.09	19	0.32	19	0.27	22	0.29
Magin 1975		25	0.85	8	0.07	10	0.10	21	0.32	15	0.34	18	0.33
Meguri 1997		18	0.86	53	0.00	22	0.09	23	0.28	5	0.51	14	0.38
Milkina 1970		42	0.80	52	0.00	52	0.05	50	0.05	47	0.05	52	0.05
Mohovich 1999		21	0.85	12	0.02	17	0.10	18	0.32	12	0.52	11	0.41
Nezu 2005		23	0.85	13	0.02	15	0.10	12	0.43	9	0.45	10	0.44
Ohlsson 1999		28	0.84	19	0.01	35	0.05	39	0.05	45	0.06	54	0.05
Olejniczak 1990		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Osinska 1989		17	0.86	11	0.02	16	0.10	14	0.41	21	0.18	24	0.27
Perlemuter 1992		37	0.82	36	0.00	49	0.05	45	0.05	17	0.23	36	0.11
Poblocka 1999		12	0.87	43	0.00	28	0.08	25	0.24	41	0.06	32	0.12
Rangell 2001		31	0.84	51	0.00	50	0.05	40	0.05	9	0.42	29	0.14
Richter 1960		48	0.77	17	0.01	59	0.04	57	0.04	53	0.04	61	0.04
Richter 1961		59	0.72	18	0.01	62	0.04	55	0.04	40	0.06	49	0.05
Rosen 1989		8	0.88	1	0.10	1	0.09	8	0.47	4	0.46	8	0.46
Rubinstein 1939		43	0.80	40	0.00	39	0.05	47	0.05	46	0.06	50	0.05
Rubinstein 1952		39	0.82	65	0.00	27	0.08	29	0.16	41	0.06	42	0.10
Rubinstein 1966		9	0.88	31	0.00	19	0.08	15	0.38	30	0.12	26	0.21
Rudanovskaya 2007		36	0.82	41	0.00	56	0.04	58	0.04	20	0.35	33	0.12
Shebanova 2002		15	0.86	59	0.00	25	0.11	22	0.32	19	0.31	20	0.31
Smith 1975		16	0.86	39	0.00	31	0.08	30	0.15	8	0.37	25	0.24
Sztompka 1959		27	0.84	32	0.00	45	0.05	48	0.05	19	0.26	38	0.11
Tanyel 1992		13	0.87	24	0.01	14	0.09	7	0.48	3	0.62	2	0.55
Tsujii 2005		1	0.91	4	0.08	6	0.15	6	0.49	10	0.39	9	0.44
Uninsky 1959		32	0.83	46	0.00	38	0.06	36	0.06	42	0.06	46	0.06
Vardi 1988		58	0.72	48	0.00	60	0.04	59	0.04	51	0.05	60	0.04
Wasowski 1980		35	0.83	16	0.01	11	0.10	13	0.41	11	0.38	12	0.39
Zimerman 1975		33	0.83	33	0.00	48	0.05	44	0.05	40	0.05	55	0.05
Random 1		66	-0.15	63	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	62	0.03	66	0.02
Random 2		65	0.02	62	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	36	0.07	63	0.03
Random 3		64	0.07	66	0.00	64	0.03	61	0.03	49	0.04	64	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).