Chiu 1999

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		24	0.79	10	0.02	18	0.10	7	0.36	43	0.05	19	0.13
Ax 1995		47	0.72	35	0.00	51	0.05	45	0.05	48	0.05	46	0.05
Bacha 1998		44	0.72	7	0.05	13	0.08	20	0.22	40	0.06	22	0.11
Barbosa 1983		59	0.61	13	0.02	53	0.05	38	0.05	50	0.05	44	0.05
BenOr 1989		7	0.83	8	0.03	11	0.08	3	0.46	16	0.31	1	0.38
Biret 1990		11	0.82	56	0.00	32	0.05	30	0.10	58	0.04	39	0.06
Brailowsky 1960		37	0.77	15	0.01	24	0.07	26	0.18	32	0.13	15	0.15
Chiu 1999		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Clidat 1994		52	0.70	31	0.00	15	0.10	18	0.22	44	0.06	23	0.11
Cohen 1997		46	0.72	39	0.00	58	0.03	62	0.03	31	0.17	34	0.07
Cortot 1951		48	0.71	65	0.00	59	0.04	58	0.04	62	0.03	65	0.03
Csalog 1996		29	0.78	6	0.06	5	0.09	14	0.28	32	0.13	11	0.19
Czerny 1989		42	0.73	32	0.00	38	0.05	36	0.05	44	0.05	40	0.05
Ezaki 2006		10	0.82	16	0.01	22	0.07	28	0.14	12	0.31	8	0.21
Falvay 1989		4	0.83	9	0.03	14	0.07	12	0.34	35	0.08	13	0.16
Fiorentino 1962		15	0.82	59	0.00	48	0.04	52	0.04	48	0.05	60	0.04
Fliere 1977		19	0.81	40	0.00	17	0.09	19	0.22	43	0.05	25	0.10
Fou 1978		39	0.76	20	0.01	19	0.09	13	0.32	28	0.16	6	0.23
Francois 1956		60	0.60	41	0.00	62	0.03	63	0.03	63	0.03	66	0.03
Goldenweiser 1946		61	0.59	14	0.02	37	0.04	53	0.04	32	0.10	35	0.06
Gornostaeva 1994		40	0.75	66	0.00	50	0.05	37	0.05	44	0.05	47	0.05
Groot 1988		3	0.85	3	0.10	3	0.15	2	0.51	32	0.13	4	0.26
Hatto 1993		9	0.83	4	0.09	4	0.10	6	0.39	30	0.17	5	0.26
Hatto 1997		27	0.79	30	0.00	7	0.10	8	0.35	46	0.06	16	0.14
Horszowski 1983		35	0.77	27	0.00	28	0.06	27	0.14	40	0.07	24	0.10
Indjic 2001		18	0.81	22	0.01	6	0.06	9	0.35	31	0.13	9	0.21
Katin 1996		12	0.82	2	0.15	2	0.14	10	0.35	24	0.24	3	0.29
Kiepura 1999		62	0.59	49	0.00	60	0.04	57	0.04	50	0.04	49	0.04
Korecka 1992		50	0.71	48	0.00	57	0.04	51	0.04	59	0.03	62	0.03
Kushner 1990		57	0.64	24	0.01	54	0.05	35	0.05	49	0.05	43	0.05
Lilamand 2001		56	0.66	38	0.00	52	0.05	46	0.05	22	0.32	17	0.13
Luisada 1990		33	0.78	55	0.00	39	0.05	43	0.05	51	0.04	56	0.04
Luisada 2008		8	0.83	25	0.01	20	0.11	15	0.28	40	0.05	21	0.12
Lushtak 2004		13	0.82	62	0.00	21	0.07	23	0.20	59	0.04	31	0.09
Malcuzynski 1951		63	0.49	29	0.00	55	0.07	33	0.07	60	0.03	48	0.05
Malcuzynski 1961		43	0.73	5	0.06	10	0.09	5	0.41	39	0.06	14	0.16
Magaloff 1977		5	0.83	21	0.01	16	0.09	4	0.43	32	0.09	10	0.20
Magin 1975		31	0.78	33	0.00	29	0.07	29	0.14	33	0.07	26	0.10
Meguri 1997		14	0.82	43	0.00	33	0.05	41	0.05	30	0.14	32	0.08
Milkina 1970		36	0.77	37	0.00	41	0.05	47	0.05	42	0.05	41	0.05
Mohovich 1999		34	0.77	18	0.01	49	0.05	44	0.05	53	0.04	59	0.04
Nezu 2005		17	0.81	60	0.00	34	0.05	39	0.05	57	0.04	58	0.04
Ohlsson 1999		32	0.78	26	0.01	9	0.09	17	0.26	46	0.06	20	0.12
Olejniczak 1990		2	0.86	1	0.16	1	0.16	1	0.54	27	0.22	2	0.34
Osinska 1989		38	0.76	57	0.00	45	0.04	49	0.04	46	0.04	51	0.04
Perlemuter 1992		51	0.70	46	0.00	42	0.04	54	0.04	44	0.04	50	0.04
Poblocka 1999		23	0.79	17	0.01	35	0.05	40	0.05	62	0.04	52	0.04
Rangell 2001		30	0.78	45	0.00	44	0.04	50	0.04	24	0.17	33	0.08
Richter 1960		54	0.68	42	0.00	56	0.04	55	0.04	59	0.03	63	0.03
Richter 1961		55	0.68	63	0.00	61	0.03	61	0.03	57	0.03	61	0.03
Rosen 1989		22	0.80	36	0.00	25	0.08	24	0.18	44	0.06	28	0.10
Rubinstein 1939		53	0.68	47	0.00	46	0.03	60	0.03	44	0.06	53	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		49	0.71	28	0.00	26	0.09	21	0.21	47	0.05	29	0.10
Rubinstein 1966		21	0.80	58	0.00	40	0.06	34	0.06	41	0.06	36	0.06
Rudanovskaya 2007		6	0.83	19	0.01	31	0.05	32	0.09	18	0.36	12	0.18
Shebanova 2002		28	0.79	12	0.02	8	0.07	11	0.35	56	0.05	18	0.13
Smith 1975		1	0.86	44	0.00	12	0.09	16	0.28	29	0.18	7	0.22
Sztompka 1959		25	0.79	54	0.00	47	0.04	56	0.04	38	0.07	42	0.05
Tanyel 1992		41	0.74	61	0.00	43	0.04	59	0.04	47	0.05	57	0.04
Tsujii 2005		20	0.81	11	0.02	30	0.05	31	0.10	56	0.04	37	0.06
Uninsky 1959		26	0.79	51	0.00	23	0.06	22	0.21	45	0.05	27	0.10
Vardi 1988		58	0.62	50	0.00	63	0.04	48	0.04	58	0.04	54	0.04
Wasowski 1980		45	0.72	23	0.01	27	0.08	25	0.18	48	0.05	30	0.09
Zimerman 1975		16	0.81	52	0.00	36	0.05	42	0.05	41	0.05	45	0.05
Random 1		66	-0.06	53	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	20	0.18	38	0.06
Random 2		65	0.04	34	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	31	0.14	55	0.04
Random 3		64	0.05	64	0.00	64	0.03	64	0.03	59	0.03	64	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).