Poblocka 1999

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		49	0.71	28	0.00	21	0.07	24	0.24	27	0.27	28	0.25
Ax 1995		44	0.72	7	0.03	20	0.07	26	0.24	6	0.54	18	0.36
Bacha 1998		25	0.76	19	0.01	13	0.11	14	0.37	11	0.49	14	0.43
Barbosa 1983		57	0.65	43	0.00	42	0.05	49	0.05	26	0.24	49	0.11
BenOr 1989		35	0.74	53	0.00	48	0.07	38	0.07	39	0.07	54	0.07
Biret 1990		5	0.82	25	0.00	6	0.21	8	0.51	8	0.56	7	0.53
Brailowsky 1960		45	0.72	52	0.00	35	0.08	34	0.08	6	0.56	31	0.21
Chiu 1999		38	0.74	20	0.01	44	0.05	56	0.05	17	0.22	50	0.10
Clidat 1994		39	0.73	15	0.01	14	0.09	18	0.35	8	0.65	11	0.48
Cohen 1997		62	0.57	59	0.00	58	0.03	64	0.03	21	0.30	51	0.09
Cortot 1951		56	0.66	56	0.00	59	0.03	63	0.03	34	0.07	63	0.05
Csalog 1996		17	0.78	5	0.05	11	0.09	20	0.28	14	0.45	20	0.35
Czerny 1989		29	0.76	48	0.00	28	0.08	27	0.21	14	0.47	22	0.31
Ezaki 2006		37	0.74	23	0.01	51	0.05	48	0.05	11	0.37	43	0.14
Falvay 1989		2	0.83	3	0.12	4	0.26	4	0.57	11	0.47	8	0.52
Fiorentino 1962		16	0.79	27	0.00	31	0.08	31	0.14	10	0.50	26	0.26
Fliere 1977		26	0.76	34	0.00	37	0.07	40	0.07	24	0.21	45	0.12
Fou 1978		27	0.76	10	0.01	24	0.07	23	0.25	17	0.30	24	0.27
Francois 1956		53	0.69	58	0.00	50	0.06	45	0.06	4	0.48	36	0.17
Goldenweiser 1946		50	0.71	41	0.00	38	0.06	44	0.06	12	0.40	38	0.15
Gornostaeva 1994		52	0.70	37	0.00	54	0.05	50	0.05	39	0.06	61	0.05
Groot 1988		6	0.82	16	0.01	7	0.17	9	0.46	15	0.40	15	0.43
Hatto 1993		9	0.81	35	0.00	10	0.09	10	0.45	7	0.61	9	0.52
Hatto 1997		11	0.81	6	0.04	8	0.16	7	0.52	7	0.58	6	0.55
Horszowski 1983		55	0.66	55	0.00	46	0.05	57	0.05	43	0.05	57	0.05
Indjic 2001		8	0.82	12	0.01	9	0.13	6	0.52	4	0.61	5	0.56
Katin 1996		12	0.80	57	0.00	16	0.08	11	0.42	7	0.54	10	0.48
Kiepura 1999		60	0.65	61	0.00	55	0.04	58	0.04	17	0.31	48	0.11
Korecka 1992		41	0.73	63	0.00	52	0.06	41	0.06	39	0.08	53	0.07
Kushner 1990		47	0.71	39	0.00	33	0.08	35	0.08	11	0.54	32	0.21
Lilamand 2001		63	0.56	51	0.00	63	0.05	51	0.05	40	0.07	56	0.06
Luisada 1990		3	0.83	2	0.19	2	0.30	3	0.63	3	0.61	3	0.62
Luisada 2008		10	0.81	17	0.01	5	0.19	5	0.54	2	0.67	4	0.60
Lushtak 2004		21	0.78	26	0.00	34	0.07	39	0.07	22	0.38	37	0.16
Malcuzynski 1951		61	0.63	11	0.01	39	0.08	33	0.08	37	0.06	55	0.07
Malcuzynski 1961		40	0.73	38	0.00	23	0.08	28	0.20	27	0.18	34	0.19
Magaloff 1977		34	0.75	54	0.00	47	0.06	47	0.06	32	0.10	52	0.08
Magin 1975		18	0.78	40	0.00	26	0.09	21	0.27	23	0.24	27	0.25
Meguri 1997		46	0.71	65	0.00	57	0.04	59	0.04	45	0.06	58	0.05
Milkina 1970		15	0.79	42	0.00	19	0.08	17	0.36	4	0.55	12	0.44
Mohovich 1999		20	0.78	49	0.00	25	0.08	22	0.26	15	0.44	21	0.34
Nezu 2005		4	0.83	4	0.05	3	0.26	2	0.64	1	0.64	2	0.64
Ohlsson 1999		14	0.79	14	0.01	18	0.07	12	0.40	19	0.35	16	0.37
Olejniczak 1990		23	0.78	47	0.00	40	0.07	36	0.07	30	0.19	47	0.12
Osinska 1989		13	0.80	60	0.00	15	0.09	15	0.37	22	0.20	23	0.27
Perlemuter 1992		59	0.65	66	0.00	62	0.04	60	0.04	56	0.04	64	0.04
Poblocka 1999		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rangell 2001		54	0.67	29	0.00	61	0.05	55	0.05	35	0.06	62	0.05
Richter 1960		31	0.76	13	0.01	36	0.06	42	0.06	12	0.40	41	0.15
Richter 1961		48	0.71	22	0.01	49	0.07	37	0.07	15	0.45	35	0.18
Rosen 1989		32	0.75	18	0.01	32	0.07	32	0.13	18	0.36	30	0.22
Rubinstein 1939		24	0.76	8	0.02	22	0.08	13	0.37	10	0.49	13	0.43
Rubinstein 1952		28	0.76	31	0.00	27	0.08	25	0.24	25	0.22	29	0.23
Rubinstein 1966		1	0.84	1	0.29	1	0.29	1	0.67	5	0.63	1	0.65
Rudanovskaya 2007		42	0.72	24	0.01	56	0.06	46	0.06	14	0.40	42	0.15
Shebanova 2002		22	0.78	32	0.00	30	0.07	29	0.19	28	0.21	33	0.20
Smith 1975		36	0.74	21	0.01	45	0.05	53	0.05	15	0.44	39	0.15
Sztompka 1959		33	0.75	33	0.00	43	0.05	54	0.05	13	0.41	44	0.14
Tanyel 1992		58	0.65	62	0.00	60	0.04	61	0.04	38	0.06	59	0.05
Tsujii 2005		7	0.82	30	0.00	17	0.07	19	0.33	15	0.42	17	0.37
Uninsky 1959		19	0.78	9	0.02	12	0.09	16	0.36	18	0.34	19	0.35
Vardi 1988		51	0.70	44	0.00	41	0.05	52	0.05	13	0.46	40	0.15
Wasowski 1980		30	0.76	45	0.00	29	0.07	30	0.16	15	0.42	25	0.26
Zimerman 1975		43	0.72	50	0.00	53	0.06	43	0.06	43	0.05	60	0.05
Random 1		66	-0.01	46	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	44	0.03	65	0.02
Random 2		65	0.00	64	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	60	0.02	66	0.01
Random 3		64	0.07	36	0.00	64	0.04	62	0.04	17	0.36	46	0.12

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).