Malcuzynski 1961

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		44	0.67	39	0.00	21	0.09	21	0.27	15	0.38	23	0.32
Ax 1995		53	0.62	40	0.00	52	0.06	51	0.06	37	0.06	60	0.06
Bacha 1998		18	0.72	55	0.00	31	0.07	31	0.13	12	0.48	27	0.25
Barbosa 1983		46	0.66	5	0.06	13	0.11	18	0.35	8	0.57	15	0.45
BenOr 1989		20	0.72	16	0.01	25	0.07	22	0.26	11	0.55	20	0.38
Biret 1990		19	0.72	34	0.00	28	0.06	26	0.18	26	0.23	31	0.20
Brailowsky 1960		51	0.63	59	0.00	50	0.05	53	0.05	25	0.21	54	0.10
Chiu 1999		39	0.69	18	0.01	41	0.07	38	0.07	3	0.48	34	0.18
Clidat 1994		45	0.67	41	0.00	46	0.08	35	0.08	30	0.26	42	0.14
Cohen 1997		63	0.50	53	0.00	63	0.05	57	0.05	32	0.17	58	0.09
Cortot 1951		57	0.60	62	0.00	57	0.04	61	0.04	15	0.31	53	0.11
Csalog 1996		28	0.71	22	0.00	30	0.08	28	0.15	17	0.42	28	0.25
Czerny 1989		16	0.73	19	0.01	16	0.08	17	0.35	5	0.56	17	0.44
Ezaki 2006		56	0.61	57	0.00	51	0.05	54	0.05	18	0.29	46	0.12
Falvay 1989		12	0.76	9	0.03	7	0.11	7	0.52	18	0.38	16	0.44
Fiorentino 1962		41	0.68	48	0.00	48	0.08	36	0.08	31	0.15	52	0.11
Fliere 1977		30	0.71	58	0.00	29	0.07	29	0.14	13	0.41	29	0.24
Fou 1978		29	0.71	26	0.00	20	0.10	20	0.33	12	0.42	21	0.37
Francois 1956		59	0.59	60	0.00	56	0.05	60	0.05	23	0.21	57	0.10
Goldenweiser 1946		38	0.69	33	0.00	32	0.07	30	0.14	2	0.51	25	0.27
Gornostaeva 1994		40	0.68	31	0.00	44	0.09	34	0.09	13	0.47	30	0.21
Groot 1988		11	0.76	10	0.03	5	0.18	5	0.53	7	0.49	10	0.51
Hatto 1993		6	0.77	15	0.02	11	0.15	11	0.50	8	0.59	4	0.54
Hatto 1997		7	0.77	6	0.05	9	0.11	6	0.53	8	0.56	3	0.54
Horszowski 1983		23	0.72	17	0.01	14	0.09	13	0.43	3	0.61	7	0.51
Indjic 2001		9	0.76	30	0.00	12	0.16	12	0.49	13	0.52	12	0.50
Katin 1996		22	0.72	56	0.00	38	0.09	33	0.09	19	0.35	35	0.18
Kiepura 1999		62	0.55	51	0.00	62	0.05	59	0.05	53	0.04	65	0.04
Korecka 1992		32	0.71	21	0.01	23	0.07	32	0.12	26	0.25	38	0.17
Kushner 1990		35	0.70	52	0.00	33	0.06	43	0.06	8	0.55	36	0.18
Lilamand 2001		54	0.62	29	0.00	45	0.07	42	0.07	5	0.54	33	0.19
Luisada 1990		13	0.76	3	0.11	3	0.17	3	0.55	11	0.47	9	0.51
Luisada 2008		21	0.72	32	0.00	18	0.10	19	0.34	10	0.48	19	0.40
Lushtak 2004		24	0.72	25	0.00	37	0.07	40	0.07	20	0.38	41	0.16
Malcuzynski 1951		26	0.72	13	0.02	19	0.09	14	0.38	2	0.68	11	0.51
Malcuzynski 1961		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Magaloff 1977		17	0.73	28	0.00	15	0.09	16	0.37	3	0.57	14	0.46
Magin 1975		5	0.77	4	0.08	6	0.12	9	0.51	6	0.54	5	0.52
Meguri 1997		52	0.63	38	0.00	53	0.05	52	0.05	22	0.30	47	0.12
Milkina 1970		27	0.71	42	0.00	24	0.07	25	0.19	8	0.45	24	0.29
Mohovich 1999		33	0.71	20	0.01	22	0.08	23	0.24	14	0.46	22	0.33
Nezu 2005		31	0.71	61	0.00	35	0.06	46	0.06	30	0.16	56	0.10
Ohlsson 1999		15	0.73	65	0.00	26	0.07	24	0.21	21	0.32	26	0.26
Olejniczak 1990		25	0.72	47	0.00	36	0.07	41	0.07	17	0.43	39	0.17
Osinska 1989		1	0.78	7	0.04	10	0.12	10	0.50	13	0.33	18	0.41
Perlemuter 1992		49	0.64	14	0.02	55	0.05	58	0.05	20	0.24	50	0.11
Poblocka 1999		14	0.73	37	0.00	27	0.06	27	0.18	28	0.20	32	0.19
Rangell 2001		61	0.57	46	0.00	61	0.04	63	0.04	34	0.07	64	0.05
Richter 1960		42	0.68	24	0.00	47	0.07	39	0.07	26	0.20	48	0.12
Richter 1961		60	0.57	27	0.00	60	0.04	62	0.04	39	0.07	61	0.05
Rosen 1989		47	0.66	49	0.00	42	0.06	45	0.06	21	0.32	44	0.14
Rubinstein 1939		34	0.70	23	0.00	39	0.08	37	0.08	28	0.22	45	0.13
Rubinstein 1952		3	0.77	1	0.24	1	0.23	1	0.63	4	0.62	1	0.62
Rubinstein 1966		4	0.77	2	0.13	2	0.27	2	0.56	9	0.47	8	0.51
Rudanovskaya 2007		55	0.62	36	0.00	58	0.06	47	0.06	15	0.35	43	0.14
Shebanova 2002		8	0.77	8	0.03	4	0.13	4	0.54	8	0.57	2	0.55
Smith 1975		43	0.68	63	0.00	40	0.06	49	0.06	10	0.49	37	0.17
Sztompka 1959		36	0.70	35	0.00	34	0.06	50	0.06	10	0.45	40	0.16
Tanyel 1992		50	0.63	45	0.00	54	0.05	55	0.05	30	0.20	55	0.10
Tsujii 2005		37	0.70	43	0.00	43	0.06	48	0.06	34	0.07	59	0.06
Uninsky 1959		2	0.77	12	0.02	8	0.11	8	0.51	6	0.53	6	0.52
Vardi 1988		58	0.60	54	0.00	59	0.05	56	0.05	51	0.05	62	0.05
Wasowski 1980		10	0.76	11	0.02	17	0.09	15	0.37	5	0.59	13	0.47
Zimerman 1975		48	0.65	44	0.00	49	0.06	44	0.06	40	0.05	63	0.05
Random 1		65	0.07	50	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	1	0.58	51	0.11
Random 2		66	0.02	66	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	34	0.07	66	0.03
Random 3		64	0.08	64	0.00	64	0.03	64	0.03	9	0.45	49	0.12

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).