Ashkenazy 1981

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Ax 1995		32	0.69	12	0.02	19	0.07	25	0.28	7	0.51	17	0.38
Bacha 1998		39	0.66	62	0.00	40	0.06	37	0.06	28	0.24	45	0.12
Barbosa 1983		44	0.65	16	0.01	38	0.05	51	0.05	18	0.39	42	0.14
BenOr 1989		51	0.62	55	0.00	55	0.05	55	0.05	36	0.08	59	0.06
Biret 1990		9	0.76	19	0.01	13	0.11	13	0.41	18	0.33	18	0.37
Brailowsky 1960		42	0.66	47	0.00	47	0.06	35	0.06	16	0.37	36	0.15
Chiu 1999		35	0.67	58	0.00	45	0.06	41	0.06	21	0.20	52	0.11
Clidat 1994		27	0.70	10	0.02	28	0.08	28	0.27	12	0.57	14	0.39
Cohen 1997		62	0.53	36	0.00	59	0.05	47	0.05	16	0.44	38	0.15
Cortot 1951		63	0.46	50	0.00	61	0.04	63	0.04	35	0.06	62	0.05
Csalog 1996		17	0.73	11	0.02	18	0.07	14	0.40	15	0.45	12	0.42
Czerny 1989		54	0.60	21	0.01	54	0.05	53	0.05	45	0.05	61	0.05
Ezaki 2006		40	0.66	45	0.00	56	0.06	40	0.06	13	0.36	35	0.15
Falvay 1989		7	0.76	4	0.07	8	0.13	5	0.59	13	0.43	6	0.50
Fiorentino 1962		24	0.71	41	0.00	30	0.11	30	0.23	13	0.47	24	0.33
Fliere 1977		10	0.75	27	0.00	20	0.07	23	0.30	12	0.41	21	0.35
Fou 1978		28	0.70	2	0.17	3	0.22	11	0.48	11	0.42	9	0.45
Francois 1956		56	0.59	56	0.00	62	0.04	59	0.04	36	0.07	63	0.05
Goldenweiser 1946		59	0.57	46	0.00	46	0.06	36	0.06	23	0.25	44	0.12
Gornostaeva 1994		26	0.71	49	0.00	32	0.05	32	0.10	11	0.52	32	0.23
Groot 1988		4	0.77	15	0.01	7	0.14	10	0.49	20	0.34	13	0.41
Hatto 1993		19	0.73	39	0.00	21	0.07	18	0.35	21	0.37	20	0.36
Hatto 1997		18	0.73	22	0.01	22	0.09	16	0.37	25	0.27	26	0.32
Horszowski 1983		47	0.64	48	0.00	42	0.06	34	0.06	28	0.20	51	0.11
Indjic 2001		21	0.71	13	0.02	23	0.11	20	0.33	20	0.36	23	0.34
Katin 1996		36	0.67	57	0.00	35	0.06	42	0.06	25	0.23	46	0.12
Kiepura 1999		58	0.57	53	0.00	58	0.06	39	0.06	15	0.35	40	0.14
Korecka 1992		38	0.66	59	0.00	37	0.05	54	0.05	12	0.40	41	0.14
Kushner 1990		57	0.57	64	0.00	43	0.05	50	0.05	31	0.14	58	0.08
Lilamand 2001		53	0.60	42	0.00	51	0.04	57	0.04	13	0.38	47	0.12
Luisada 1990		3	0.77	1	0.23	1	0.22	1	0.68	5	0.58	2	0.63
Luisada 2008		15	0.74	28	0.00	16	0.08	19	0.35	14	0.38	19	0.36
Lushtak 2004		12	0.74	31	0.00	24	0.10	22	0.30	14	0.47	16	0.38
Malcuzynski 1951		52	0.61	24	0.01	36	0.06	43	0.06	27	0.16	53	0.10
Malcuzynski 1961		34	0.67	35	0.00	15	0.10	15	0.38	21	0.27	25	0.32
Magaloff 1977		30	0.69	51	0.00	44	0.05	48	0.05	25	0.29	49	0.12
Magin 1975		16	0.74	30	0.00	25	0.11	24	0.30	26	0.21	30	0.25
Meguri 1997		50	0.62	65	0.00	53	0.04	56	0.04	16	0.42	43	0.13
Milkina 1970		49	0.62	32	0.00	39	0.06	45	0.06	12	0.39	37	0.15
Mohovich 1999		43	0.65	52	0.00	41	0.06	38	0.06	24	0.25	50	0.12
Nezu 2005		31	0.69	18	0.01	14	0.11	12	0.43	8	0.48	11	0.45
Ohlsson 1999		1	0.78	7	0.04	10	0.15	8	0.55	12	0.49	5	0.52
Olejniczak 1990		41	0.66	60	0.00	31	0.08	31	0.17	18	0.36	31	0.25
Osinska 1989		11	0.75	26	0.00	4	0.14	3	0.61	7	0.40	8	0.49
Perlemuter 1992		61	0.55	63	0.00	63	0.05	49	0.05	44	0.05	60	0.05
Poblocka 1999		22	0.71	38	0.00	26	0.09	27	0.27	24	0.24	29	0.25
Rangell 2001		55	0.59	25	0.00	52	0.04	58	0.04	10	0.57	39	0.15
Richter 1960		29	0.69	14	0.01	34	0.05	46	0.05	18	0.27	48	0.12
Richter 1961		45	0.65	54	0.00	49	0.04	62	0.04	29	0.19	54	0.09
Rosen 1989		33	0.69	9	0.02	12	0.18	21	0.30	12	0.50	15	0.39
Rubinstein 1939		8	0.76	8	0.03	11	0.20	4	0.61	6	0.55	3	0.58
Rubinstein 1952		25	0.71	33	0.00	17	0.07	17	0.36	24	0.23	28	0.29
Rubinstein 1966		2	0.77	5	0.06	5	0.12	6	0.56	14	0.36	10	0.45
Rudanovskaya 2007		60	0.55	66	0.00	60	0.04	60	0.04	23	0.22	57	0.09
Shebanova 2002		20	0.72	61	0.00	27	0.08	26	0.28	21	0.33	27	0.30
Smith 1975		37	0.67	29	0.00	48	0.06	33	0.06	16	0.44	34	0.16
Sztompka 1959		46	0.64	40	0.00	57	0.05	52	0.05	30	0.15	56	0.09
Tanyel 1992		23	0.71	43	0.00	33	0.06	44	0.06	14	0.60	33	0.19
Tsujii 2005		14	0.74	20	0.01	9	0.11	9	0.51	9	0.49	7	0.50
Uninsky 1959		6	0.76	6	0.04	6	0.14	7	0.56	5	0.54	4	0.55
Vardi 1988		48	0.63	23	0.01	50	0.04	61	0.04	26	0.19	55	0.09
Wasowski 1980		5	0.76	3	0.11	2	0.22	2	0.67	1	0.74	1	0.70
Zimerman 1975		13	0.74	17	0.01	29	0.09	29	0.24	13	0.52	22	0.35
Random 1		66	-0.05	34	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	51	0.03	66	0.02
Random 2		65	0.00	37	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	58	0.03	65	0.02
Random 3		64	0.07	44	0.00	64	0.03	64	0.03	55	0.03	64	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).