Paderewski 1912

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		55	0.54	38	0.00	58	0.03	61	0.03	51	0.04	61	0.03
Ashkenazy 1981		20	0.67	27	0.00	26	0.14	24	0.34	39	0.09	23	0.17
Beliavsky 2004		40	0.61	28	0.00	38	0.06	41	0.06	33	0.09	40	0.07
BenOr 1989		24	0.66	32	0.00	20	0.11	23	0.35	53	0.05	28	0.13
Biret 1990		15	0.68	18	0.00	18	0.12	12	0.54	43	0.06	22	0.18
Blet 2003		51	0.55	35	0.00	54	0.05	52	0.05	63	0.04	58	0.04
Block 1995		36	0.63	43	0.00	37	0.06	42	0.06	58	0.04	52	0.05
Brailowsky 1960		45	0.59	45	0.00	49	0.06	40	0.06	49	0.06	44	0.06
Chiu 1999		43	0.59	57	0.00	51	0.06	38	0.06	47	0.06	45	0.06
Clidat 1994		48	0.58	37	0.00	50	0.05	47	0.05	58	0.04	59	0.04
Cohen 1997		61	0.49	61	0.00	61	0.04	58	0.04	61	0.03	63	0.03
Coop 1987		23	0.67	63	0.00	27	0.08	27	0.28	33	0.12	21	0.18
Cortot 1951		38	0.62	23	0.00	34	0.08	36	0.08	46	0.05	48	0.06
Czerny 1949		26	0.66	15	0.01	14	0.10	16	0.49	28	0.23	10	0.34
Czerny 1949b		34	0.63	34	0.00	35	0.09	35	0.09	41	0.08	37	0.08
Ezaki 2006		39	0.62	66	0.00	39	0.05	45	0.05	38	0.08	42	0.06
Falvay 1989		57	0.53	62	0.00	56	0.04	59	0.04	60	0.04	55	0.04
Ferenczy 1958		27	0.66	2	0.21	3	0.27	9	0.56	2	0.70	1	0.63
Fiorentino 1962		31	0.65	51	0.00	33	0.10	33	0.10	45	0.06	38	0.08
Fliere 1977		29	0.65	53	0.00	32	0.08	32	0.15	47	0.05	33	0.09
Fou 1978		6	0.71	3	0.05	5	0.15	3	0.64	27	0.23	8	0.38
Francois 1956		63	0.41	29	0.00	63	0.06	43	0.06	39	0.07	49	0.06
Hatto 1997		47	0.58	64	0.00	53	0.05	51	0.05	49	0.06	50	0.05
Horowitz 1971		33	0.63	8	0.01	23	0.10	29	0.23	26	0.19	14	0.21
Horowitz 1985		52	0.55	30	0.00	45	0.04	57	0.04	35	0.08	43	0.06
Indjic 2001		35	0.63	60	0.00	41	0.06	39	0.06	47	0.06	47	0.06
Kapell 1951		21	0.67	49	0.00	19	0.11	22	0.38	56	0.05	27	0.14
Kiepura 1999		58	0.52	46	0.00	60	0.04	60	0.04	57	0.04	53	0.04
Kilenyi 1937		11	0.69	19	0.00	21	0.12	19	0.43	40	0.08	19	0.19
Kissin 1993		5	0.71	24	0.00	9	0.11	8	0.57	39	0.08	13	0.21
Kitain 1937		60	0.50	36	0.00	55	0.05	53	0.05	28	0.23	31	0.11
Kushner 1990		62	0.49	40	0.00	62	0.05	49	0.05	53	0.04	56	0.04
Levy 1951		4	0.71	7	0.01	6	0.20	4	0.63	24	0.38	5	0.49
Luisada 1990		42	0.60	56	0.00	48	0.05	48	0.05	44	0.06	51	0.05
Lushtak 2004		56	0.53	22	0.00	59	0.03	62	0.03	56	0.05	60	0.04
Lympany 1968		53	0.55	42	0.00	47	0.04	54	0.04	52	0.04	54	0.04
Magaloff 1977		8	0.71	25	0.00	12	0.11	7	0.58	50	0.06	20	0.19
Magaloff 1977b		7	0.71	33	0.00	13	0.15	6	0.58	37	0.07	18	0.20
Magin 1975		44	0.59	47	0.00	52	0.08	37	0.08	63	0.04	46	0.06
Milkina 1970		13	0.69	6	0.02	17	0.13	13	0.53	11	0.44	6	0.48
Mohovich 1999		28	0.66	21	0.00	28	0.09	28	0.25	60	0.04	32	0.10
Nadelmann 1956		50	0.55	11	0.01	42	0.05	44	0.05	57	0.04	57	0.04
Ohlsson 1999		19	0.67	10	0.01	24	0.11	21	0.39	16	0.36	9	0.37
Olejniczac 1990		25	0.66	59	0.00	29	0.10	26	0.28	53	0.05	30	0.12
Olejniczak 1991		37	0.62	55	0.00	36	0.09	34	0.09	37	0.08	36	0.08
Osinska 1989		22	0.67	54	0.00	22	0.12	18	0.43	55	0.05	26	0.15
Paderewski 1912		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Perahia 1994		59	0.51	41	0.00	57	0.03	63	0.03	63	0.03	62	0.03
Perlemuter 1986		54	0.54	20	0.00	46	0.05	46	0.05	38	0.09	41	0.07
Poblocka 1999		9	0.70	50	0.00	10	0.13	10	0.55	42	0.07	15	0.20
Rangell 2001		30	0.65	52	0.00	30	0.10	30	0.23	40	0.07	29	0.13
Risler 1920		49	0.56	39	0.00	43	0.04	55	0.04	32	0.12	39	0.07
Rosen 1989		46	0.59	26	0.00	44	0.04	56	0.04	25	0.21	35	0.09
Rubinstein 1939		41	0.60	14	0.01	40	0.05	50	0.05	28	0.16	34	0.09
Rubinstein 1952		16	0.68	5	0.02	25	0.12	25	0.32	33	0.08	25	0.16
Rubinstein 1966		14	0.69	31	0.00	16	0.10	17	0.45	14	0.43	7	0.44
Rummel 1943		18	0.67	9	0.01	7	0.13	14	0.52	4	0.58	3	0.55
Shebanova 2002		32	0.64	16	0.01	31	0.08	31	0.15	21	0.26	17	0.20
Smith 1975		2	0.73	12	0.01	2	0.30	2	0.70	14	0.40	4	0.53
Szpilman 1948		3	0.72	4	0.04	4	0.27	5	0.63	10	0.55	2	0.59
Uninsky 1971		17	0.68	13	0.01	15	0.11	20	0.41	39	0.06	24	0.16
Wasowski 1980		10	0.70	17	0.00	8	0.12	15	0.50	33	0.09	11	0.21
Weissenberg 1971		12	0.69	48	0.00	11	0.10	11	0.54	37	0.08	12	0.21
Average		1	0.77	1	0.51	1	0.50	1	0.80	54	0.05	16	0.20
Random 1		65	-0.02	58	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	55	0.03	64	0.02
Random 2		64	-0.01	65	0.00	64	0.02	64	0.02	65	0.02	65	0.02
Random 3		66	-0.04	44	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	56	0.03	66	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).