Olejniczak 1991

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		43	0.67	16	0.01	46	0.07	38	0.07	33	0.07	46	0.07
Ashkenazy 1981		20	0.78	43	0.00	21	0.15	20	0.48	19	0.47	23	0.47
Beliavsky 2004		30	0.72	51	0.00	39	0.09	36	0.09	25	0.23	40	0.14
BenOr 1989		12	0.80	22	0.00	19	0.18	14	0.53	17	0.51	18	0.52
Biret 1990		5	0.84	5	0.04	7	0.17	7	0.57	12	0.54	9	0.55
Blet 2003		38	0.69	9	0.01	33	0.09	35	0.09	16	0.32	36	0.17
Block 1995		28	0.73	54	0.00	31	0.09	31	0.23	23	0.31	31	0.27
Brailowsky 1960		57	0.60	64	0.00	54	0.04	63	0.04	52	0.05	62	0.04
Chiu 1999		18	0.79	34	0.00	18	0.16	21	0.47	6	0.57	16	0.52
Clidat 1994		32	0.72	38	0.00	38	0.07	46	0.07	17	0.37	38	0.16
Cohen 1997		41	0.68	61	0.00	47	0.06	50	0.06	20	0.26	41	0.12
Coop 1987		15	0.80	37	0.00	15	0.16	16	0.51	12	0.55	13	0.53
Cortot 1951		40	0.68	44	0.00	44	0.07	44	0.07	44	0.05	50	0.06
Czerny 1949		22	0.77	35	0.00	22	0.14	22	0.46	8	0.62	14	0.53
Czerny 1949b		35	0.70	55	0.00	28	0.10	29	0.29	11	0.50	27	0.38
Ezaki 2006		3	0.84	8	0.01	4	0.14	9	0.55	9	0.60	7	0.57
Falvay 1989		27	0.74	24	0.00	30	0.08	30	0.25	24	0.33	29	0.29
Ferenczy 1958		56	0.61	19	0.01	58	0.07	42	0.07	41	0.05	47	0.06
Fiorentino 1962		10	0.83	28	0.00	8	0.16	3	0.68	5	0.74	2	0.71
Fliere 1977		33	0.71	40	0.00	40	0.12	34	0.12	42	0.06	42	0.08
Fou 1978		19	0.78	36	0.00	20	0.18	23	0.46	10	0.49	22	0.47
Francois 1956		63	0.37	42	0.00	63	0.06	53	0.06	61	0.04	61	0.05
Hatto 1997		53	0.62	63	0.00	55	0.05	62	0.05	53	0.05	56	0.05
Horowitz 1971		55	0.61	10	0.01	51	0.05	59	0.05	35	0.07	49	0.06
Horowitz 1985		59	0.56	39	0.00	57	0.06	48	0.06	32	0.11	43	0.08
Indjic 2001		44	0.66	50	0.00	48	0.05	58	0.05	55	0.05	59	0.05
Kapell 1951		21	0.78	18	0.01	12	0.12	15	0.51	7	0.50	19	0.50
Kiepura 1999		34	0.70	14	0.01	36	0.07	43	0.07	9	0.53	34	0.19
Kilenyi 1937		9	0.83	7	0.02	6	0.15	8	0.56	6	0.68	5	0.62
Kissin 1993		13	0.80	12	0.01	9	0.16	5	0.61	6	0.64	4	0.62
Kitain 1937		62	0.46	49	0.00	61	0.06	56	0.06	60	0.04	60	0.05
Kushner 1990		36	0.70	20	0.00	37	0.06	54	0.06	4	0.70	33	0.20
Levy 1951		37	0.69	57	0.00	29	0.09	28	0.30	32	0.15	32	0.21
Luisada 1990		16	0.79	25	0.00	13	0.18	18	0.50	10	0.57	15	0.53
Lushtak 2004		39	0.69	15	0.01	43	0.07	40	0.07	16	0.37	39	0.16
Lympany 1968		48	0.63	32	0.00	53	0.05	60	0.05	42	0.05	52	0.05
Magaloff 1977		14	0.80	21	0.00	14	0.12	13	0.54	14	0.51	17	0.52
Magaloff 1977b		17	0.79	26	0.00	17	0.16	17	0.51	16	0.50	20	0.50
Magin 1975		8	0.83	4	0.04	11	0.24	12	0.54	6	0.64	6	0.59
Milkina 1970		45	0.65	45	0.00	52	0.05	61	0.05	46	0.05	53	0.05
Mohovich 1999		26	0.74	17	0.01	27	0.14	27	0.33	15	0.47	26	0.39
Nadelmann 1956		29	0.73	52	0.00	32	0.11	32	0.20	14	0.38	30	0.28
Ohlsson 1999		47	0.64	62	0.00	41	0.07	39	0.07	37	0.07	45	0.07
Olejniczac 1990		2	0.86	1	0.43	1	0.42	1	0.77	3	0.76	1	0.76
Olejniczak 1991		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Osinska 1989		11	0.81	13	0.01	16	0.15	10	0.54	14	0.52	11	0.53
Paderewski 1912		52	0.62	65	0.00	45	0.08	37	0.08	34	0.09	44	0.08
Perahia 1994		49	0.63	3	0.06	34	0.12	33	0.12	19	0.24	37	0.17
Perlemuter 1986		61	0.48	31	0.00	62	0.06	51	0.06	55	0.05	54	0.05
Poblocka 1999		7	0.83	41	0.00	5	0.12	11	0.54	14	0.53	12	0.53
Rangell 2001		4	0.84	6	0.03	3	0.12	4	0.62	3	0.70	3	0.66
Risler 1920		46	0.64	48	0.00	35	0.07	41	0.07	14	0.45	35	0.18
Rosen 1989		58	0.59	47	0.00	60	0.06	52	0.06	57	0.05	58	0.05
Rubinstein 1939		60	0.56	56	0.00	59	0.05	57	0.05	61	0.04	63	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		42	0.67	46	0.00	42	0.06	47	0.06	40	0.06	51	0.06
Rubinstein 1966		50	0.63	33	0.00	56	0.06	55	0.06	50	0.05	55	0.05
Rummel 1943		54	0.62	53	0.00	50	0.07	45	0.07	45	0.05	48	0.06
Shebanova 2002		51	0.62	60	0.00	49	0.06	49	0.06	52	0.05	57	0.05
Smith 1975		24	0.76	29	0.00	26	0.12	25	0.40	20	0.30	28	0.35
Szpilman 1948		31	0.72	30	0.00	25	0.10	26	0.38	17	0.50	24	0.44
Uninsky 1971		23	0.76	27	0.00	23	0.12	24	0.45	15	0.44	25	0.44
Wasowski 1980		25	0.75	23	0.00	24	0.21	19	0.49	15	0.49	21	0.49
Weissenberg 1971		6	0.84	11	0.01	10	0.16	6	0.57	16	0.52	10	0.54
Average		1	0.86	2	0.22	2	0.41	2	0.70	18	0.44	8	0.55
Random 1		65	-0.03	58	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	54	0.03	65	0.02
Random 2		64	0.01	66	0.00	64	0.03	64	0.03	34	0.04	64	0.03
Random 3		66	-0.04	59	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	55	0.03	66	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).