Kapell 1951

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		50	0.65	41	0.00	53	0.05	51	0.05	38	0.06	58	0.05
Ashkenazy 1981		11	0.79	31	0.00	18	0.09	16	0.38	20	0.46	18	0.42
Beliavsky 2004		44	0.69	47	0.00	40	0.05	55	0.05	28	0.21	49	0.10
BenOr 1989		7	0.81	6	0.02	6	0.16	2	0.59	8	0.58	6	0.58
Biret 1990		2	0.84	11	0.01	2	0.16	3	0.59	10	0.61	4	0.60
Blet 2003		41	0.70	43	0.00	49	0.08	36	0.08	22	0.24	43	0.14
Block 1995		35	0.72	66	0.00	47	0.06	43	0.06	36	0.06	55	0.06
Brailowsky 1960		52	0.64	30	0.00	55	0.05	53	0.05	44	0.07	54	0.06
Chiu 1999		15	0.78	26	0.00	21	0.08	24	0.34	22	0.44	24	0.39
Clidat 1994		33	0.73	51	0.00	41	0.08	37	0.08	7	0.50	34	0.20
Cohen 1997		55	0.64	60	0.00	56	0.04	61	0.04	54	0.04	63	0.04
Coop 1987		10	0.80	52	0.00	16	0.08	20	0.37	19	0.48	16	0.42
Cortot 1951		18	0.78	21	0.00	27	0.08	28	0.26	4	0.60	27	0.39
Czerny 1949		39	0.70	23	0.00	33	0.09	34	0.09	19	0.38	39	0.18
Czerny 1949b		45	0.69	38	0.00	34	0.11	33	0.11	17	0.43	32	0.22
Ezaki 2006		8	0.81	24	0.00	8	0.15	8	0.48	13	0.54	8	0.51
Falvay 1989		23	0.77	3	0.05	32	0.11	31	0.21	20	0.42	31	0.30
Ferenczy 1958		62	0.54	56	0.00	60	0.03	62	0.03	51	0.04	64	0.03
Fiorentino 1962		24	0.77	64	0.00	15	0.08	18	0.37	21	0.41	26	0.39
Fliere 1977		34	0.73	57	0.00	42	0.07	39	0.07	44	0.06	53	0.06
Fou 1978		25	0.77	59	0.00	26	0.15	21	0.37	16	0.44	22	0.40
Francois 1956		63	0.42	20	0.00	63	0.06	47	0.06	52	0.05	61	0.05
Hatto 1997		30	0.75	27	0.00	36	0.06	44	0.06	10	0.54	38	0.18
Horowitz 1971		54	0.64	28	0.00	48	0.06	45	0.06	27	0.18	50	0.10
Horowitz 1985		59	0.56	29	0.00	54	0.05	59	0.05	28	0.16	51	0.09
Indjic 2001		22	0.77	7	0.02	31	0.11	30	0.23	10	0.48	30	0.33
Kapell 1951		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Kiepura 1999		53	0.64	58	0.00	57	0.04	60	0.04	34	0.06	56	0.05
Kilenyi 1937		28	0.76	39	0.00	24	0.08	19	0.37	24	0.46	20	0.41
Kissin 1993		14	0.79	37	0.00	17	0.08	23	0.36	16	0.41	28	0.38
Kitain 1937		61	0.55	16	0.01	58	0.05	57	0.05	17	0.39	46	0.14
Kushner 1990		47	0.67	45	0.00	51	0.08	38	0.08	12	0.51	33	0.20
Levy 1951		26	0.76	13	0.01	25	0.10	25	0.34	17	0.46	21	0.40
Luisada 1990		5	0.83	4	0.03	5	0.16	10	0.48	4	0.69	5	0.58
Lushtak 2004		49	0.66	49	0.00	52	0.05	54	0.05	32	0.12	52	0.08
Lympany 1968		40	0.70	48	0.00	44	0.06	48	0.06	5	0.60	35	0.19
Magaloff 1977		16	0.78	44	0.00	19	0.08	12	0.44	19	0.46	13	0.45
Magaloff 1977b		20	0.78	61	0.00	22	0.08	15	0.40	21	0.44	17	0.42
Magin 1975		21	0.77	5	0.03	13	0.14	17	0.38	19	0.50	15	0.44
Milkina 1970		38	0.71	12	0.01	14	0.09	32	0.12	17	0.26	37	0.18
Mohovich 1999		27	0.76	14	0.01	30	0.10	27	0.27	10	0.56	25	0.39
Nadelmann 1956		29	0.75	25	0.00	23	0.08	22	0.37	3	0.69	9	0.51
Ohlsson 1999		37	0.71	55	0.00	39	0.05	58	0.05	17	0.35	47	0.13
Olejniczac 1990		12	0.79	54	0.00	12	0.19	11	0.47	20	0.44	14	0.45
Olejniczak 1991		19	0.78	2	0.06	11	0.17	7	0.50	15	0.51	10	0.50
Osinska 1989		13	0.79	35	0.00	20	0.07	14	0.40	19	0.43	19	0.41
Paderewski 1912		46	0.67	34	0.00	43	0.05	56	0.05	22	0.38	45	0.14
Perahia 1994		60	0.56	40	0.00	59	0.03	63	0.03	45	0.05	62	0.04
Perlemuter 1986		58	0.57	9	0.01	62	0.06	49	0.06	52	0.05	57	0.05
Poblocka 1999		6	0.82	33	0.00	7	0.14	9	0.48	20	0.48	11	0.48
Rangell 2001		3	0.84	22	0.00	3	0.20	4	0.56	5	0.66	2	0.61
Risler 1920		48	0.66	32	0.00	35	0.07	40	0.07	10	0.48	36	0.18
Rosen 1989		57	0.59	50	0.00	61	0.05	52	0.05	39	0.06	59	0.05
Rubinstein 1939		56	0.63	17	0.01	46	0.06	46	0.06	17	0.34	42	0.14
Rubinstein 1952		36	0.72	53	0.00	38	0.07	41	0.07	17	0.36	41	0.16
Rubinstein 1966		42	0.70	8	0.02	37	0.06	42	0.06	15	0.43	40	0.16
Rummel 1943		51	0.65	19	0.00	45	0.05	50	0.05	17	0.34	48	0.13
Shebanova 2002		43	0.70	46	0.00	50	0.08	35	0.08	23	0.24	44	0.14
Smith 1975		17	0.78	10	0.01	10	0.18	13	0.43	10	0.53	12	0.48
Szpilman 1948		31	0.75	36	0.00	28	0.08	26	0.28	11	0.54	23	0.39
Uninsky 1971		32	0.74	42	0.00	29	0.09	29	0.26	19	0.41	29	0.33
Wasowski 1980		9	0.81	15	0.01	9	0.15	5	0.54	4	0.66	3	0.60
Weissenberg 1971		4	0.83	18	0.00	4	0.17	6	0.54	15	0.52	7	0.53
Average		1	0.88	1	0.62	1	0.61	1	0.77	15	0.52	1	0.63
Random 1		66	-0.04	65	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	46	0.04	65	0.02
Random 2		64	0.02	62	0.00	64	0.02	64	0.02	53	0.03	66	0.02
Random 3		65	-0.01	63	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	31	0.11	60	0.05

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).