Chiu 1999

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		47	0.65	53	0.00	51	0.04	61	0.04	29	0.17	47	0.08
Ashkenazy 1981		4	0.80	36	0.00	9	0.12	3	0.61	17	0.47	5	0.54
Beliavsky 2004		32	0.72	25	0.00	31	0.09	31	0.22	13	0.37	28	0.29
BenOr 1989		21	0.75	19	0.01	12	0.12	8	0.56	26	0.36	19	0.45
Biret 1990		8	0.79	28	0.00	14	0.11	12	0.50	23	0.37	20	0.43
Blet 2003		37	0.69	43	0.00	40	0.07	40	0.07	45	0.06	53	0.06
Block 1995		22	0.75	49	0.00	25	0.14	27	0.36	18	0.40	23	0.38
Brailowsky 1960		49	0.65	65	0.00	45	0.04	58	0.04	32	0.13	50	0.07
Chiu 1999		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Clidat 1994		34	0.70	14	0.01	37	0.12	34	0.12	18	0.34	34	0.20
Cohen 1997		41	0.67	45	0.00	46	0.05	48	0.05	9	0.37	36	0.14
Coop 1987		3	0.81	24	0.00	4	0.14	5	0.58	7	0.59	2	0.58
Cortot 1951		31	0.72	54	0.00	36	0.08	36	0.08	31	0.12	44	0.10
Czerny 1949		35	0.70	56	0.00	33	0.13	33	0.13	24	0.27	35	0.19
Czerny 1949b		50	0.64	38	0.00	42	0.05	51	0.05	33	0.12	46	0.08
Ezaki 2006		9	0.79	10	0.01	16	0.11	13	0.50	16	0.51	10	0.50
Falvay 1989		2	0.81	2	0.11	3	0.23	2	0.74	2	0.73	1	0.73
Ferenczy 1958		61	0.52	44	0.00	62	0.05	52	0.05	63	0.03	64	0.04
Fiorentino 1962		17	0.77	21	0.00	7	0.15	7	0.56	16	0.52	6	0.54
Fliere 1977		26	0.74	46	0.00	30	0.08	29	0.26	26	0.29	29	0.27
Fou 1978		29	0.73	60	0.00	29	0.08	30	0.26	29	0.20	31	0.23
Francois 1956		63	0.45	33	0.00	63	0.06	46	0.06	36	0.08	51	0.07
Hatto 1997		24	0.75	3	0.05	10	0.10	26	0.39	9	0.55	17	0.46
Horowitz 1971		59	0.59	31	0.00	59	0.06	43	0.06	52	0.05	63	0.05
Horowitz 1985		60	0.54	61	0.00	60	0.05	55	0.05	34	0.09	48	0.07
Indjic 2001		19	0.76	11	0.01	11	0.13	19	0.45	9	0.51	13	0.48
Kapell 1951		11	0.78	30	0.00	19	0.12	22	0.44	24	0.34	21	0.39
Kiepura 1999		33	0.71	9	0.01	34	0.07	38	0.07	4	0.66	32	0.21
Kilenyi 1937		14	0.78	17	0.01	8	0.14	10	0.53	18	0.53	7	0.53
Kissin 1993		25	0.75	40	0.00	21	0.12	24	0.43	24	0.29	26	0.35
Kitain 1937		62	0.51	12	0.01	61	0.04	63	0.04	40	0.06	62	0.05
Kushner 1990		53	0.61	51	0.00	58	0.05	53	0.05	44	0.05	58	0.05
Levy 1951		30	0.73	15	0.01	28	0.11	28	0.36	30	0.20	30	0.27
Luisada 1990		18	0.77	13	0.01	18	0.11	17	0.48	12	0.54	9	0.51
Lushtak 2004		44	0.67	39	0.00	48	0.06	45	0.06	28	0.17	42	0.10
Lympany 1968		48	0.65	34	0.00	44	0.05	49	0.05	30	0.18	45	0.09
Magaloff 1977		27	0.74	37	0.00	26	0.13	18	0.46	26	0.31	22	0.38
Magaloff 1977b		28	0.74	42	0.00	27	0.15	23	0.44	25	0.32	24	0.38
Magin 1975		13	0.78	22	0.00	17	0.14	20	0.45	23	0.50	15	0.47
Milkina 1970		45	0.65	55	0.00	52	0.05	54	0.05	45	0.06	57	0.05
Mohovich 1999		40	0.68	62	0.00	39	0.07	37	0.07	48	0.05	55	0.06
Nadelmann 1956		36	0.70	29	0.00	35	0.06	41	0.06	24	0.23	37	0.12
Ohlsson 1999		38	0.68	47	0.00	32	0.09	32	0.17	24	0.26	33	0.21
Olejniczac 1990		7	0.79	4	0.05	2	0.25	4	0.60	16	0.52	4	0.56
Olejniczak 1991		10	0.79	18	0.01	6	0.13	6	0.57	21	0.47	8	0.52
Osinska 1989		15	0.78	41	0.00	13	0.09	11	0.51	20	0.40	18	0.45
Paderewski 1912		57	0.59	59	0.00	55	0.06	47	0.06	38	0.06	54	0.06
Perahia 1994		55	0.60	20	0.01	49	0.04	57	0.04	37	0.06	61	0.05
Perlemuter 1986		58	0.59	26	0.00	43	0.04	59	0.04	26	0.27	41	0.10
Poblocka 1999		5	0.80	5	0.02	5	0.17	9	0.55	22	0.46	11	0.50
Rangell 2001		6	0.80	8	0.01	15	0.14	15	0.50	21	0.48	12	0.49
Risler 1920		56	0.60	58	0.00	54	0.06	44	0.06	30	0.17	39	0.10
Rosen 1989		51	0.63	32	0.00	57	0.04	60	0.04	47	0.05	65	0.04
Rubinstein 1939		52	0.62	23	0.00	56	0.05	50	0.05	38	0.07	52	0.06
Rubinstein 1952		43	0.67	48	0.00	47	0.07	39	0.07	53	0.05	56	0.06
Rubinstein 1966		46	0.65	16	0.01	50	0.04	62	0.04	35	0.06	59	0.05
Rummel 1943		54	0.60	63	0.00	53	0.05	56	0.05	41	0.06	60	0.05
Shebanova 2002		39	0.68	7	0.01	41	0.06	42	0.06	25	0.20	38	0.11
Smith 1975		20	0.75	50	0.00	24	0.12	25	0.42	24	0.28	27	0.34
Szpilman 1948		42	0.67	52	0.00	38	0.09	35	0.09	40	0.06	49	0.07
Uninsky 1971		23	0.75	27	0.00	20	0.13	16	0.48	12	0.47	16	0.47
Wasowski 1980		16	0.77	6	0.02	23	0.14	14	0.50	18	0.45	14	0.47
Weissenberg 1971		12	0.78	35	0.00	22	0.12	21	0.45	27	0.28	25	0.35
Average		1	0.86	1	0.59	1	0.58	1	0.83	25	0.38	3	0.56
Random 1		66	0.00	57	0.00	64	0.02	64	0.02	13	0.47	40	0.10
Random 2		65	0.01	66	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	35	0.04	66	0.02
Random 3		64	0.02	64	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	6	0.53	43	0.10

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).