Beliavsky 2004

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		34	0.67	61	0.00	45	0.05	45	0.05	36	0.06	49	0.05
Ashkenazy 1981		38	0.66	65	0.00	44	0.05	47	0.05	57	0.04	63	0.04
Beliavsky 2004		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
BenOr 1989		19	0.71	63	0.00	27	0.06	24	0.24	56	0.04	36	0.10
Biret 1990		16	0.72	28	0.00	22	0.09	16	0.31	36	0.08	22	0.16
Blet 2003		46	0.64	56	0.00	50	0.04	59	0.04	56	0.05	57	0.04
Block 1995		21	0.71	32	0.00	31	0.12	21	0.26	52	0.04	35	0.10
Brailowsky 1960		32	0.68	14	0.01	32	0.09	31	0.17	16	0.36	11	0.25
Chiu 1999		18	0.72	31	0.00	13	0.13	13	0.37	31	0.22	9	0.29
Clidat 1994		2	0.76	9	0.01	3	0.15	4	0.52	4	0.62	1	0.57
Cohen 1997		25	0.70	12	0.01	35	0.06	39	0.06	19	0.26	31	0.12
Coop 1987		5	0.75	8	0.02	12	0.12	11	0.39	36	0.11	16	0.21
Cortot 1951		26	0.69	23	0.00	34	0.06	38	0.06	27	0.17	37	0.10
Czerny 1949		10	0.73	17	0.01	17	0.08	12	0.39	23	0.28	7	0.33
Czerny 1949b		55	0.59	62	0.00	57	0.04	53	0.04	63	0.04	56	0.04
Ezaki 2006		11	0.72	59	0.00	25	0.07	23	0.24	50	0.06	29	0.12
Falvay 1989		12	0.72	5	0.04	11	0.16	5	0.50	26	0.23	6	0.34
Ferenczy 1958		43	0.64	2	0.11	14	0.11	29	0.21	29	0.16	18	0.18
Fiorentino 1962		29	0.69	50	0.00	21	0.06	26	0.22	32	0.13	20	0.17
Fliere 1977		31	0.68	66	0.00	36	0.08	35	0.08	53	0.05	42	0.06
Fou 1978		33	0.67	37	0.00	29	0.06	27	0.22	35	0.10	23	0.15
Francois 1956		63	0.45	57	0.00	62	0.04	58	0.04	38	0.08	44	0.06
Hatto 1997		45	0.64	54	0.00	54	0.04	52	0.04	62	0.03	65	0.03
Horowitz 1971		58	0.56	19	0.01	59	0.04	54	0.04	59	0.04	64	0.04
Horowitz 1985		61	0.50	20	0.01	40	0.06	42	0.06	54	0.05	46	0.05
Indjic 2001		37	0.66	51	0.00	47	0.05	44	0.05	62	0.04	61	0.04
Kapell 1951		28	0.69	34	0.00	23	0.07	28	0.21	55	0.05	33	0.10
Kiepura 1999		39	0.66	15	0.01	48	0.03	62	0.03	42	0.06	53	0.04
Kilenyi 1937		24	0.70	64	0.00	19	0.08	20	0.27	34	0.11	19	0.17
Kissin 1993		22	0.71	48	0.00	8	0.19	8	0.47	32	0.11	12	0.23
Kitain 1937		62	0.48	10	0.01	60	0.05	48	0.05	44	0.06	52	0.05
Kushner 1990		48	0.63	24	0.00	49	0.04	55	0.04	28	0.21	39	0.09
Levy 1951		9	0.73	7	0.03	10	0.16	3	0.54	31	0.18	8	0.31
Luisada 1990		36	0.66	52	0.00	46	0.06	41	0.06	37	0.07	43	0.06
Lushtak 2004		60	0.53	53	0.00	63	0.05	46	0.05	54	0.05	50	0.05
Lympany 1968		51	0.61	40	0.00	56	0.04	50	0.04	55	0.04	54	0.04
Magaloff 1977		17	0.72	4	0.04	4	0.16	14	0.36	30	0.15	13	0.23
Magaloff 1977b		20	0.71	44	0.00	5	0.14	15	0.34	47	0.06	27	0.14
Magin 1975		30	0.68	39	0.00	43	0.04	57	0.04	52	0.05	55	0.04
Milkina 1970		40	0.65	18	0.01	42	0.06	43	0.06	24	0.20	32	0.11
Mohovich 1999		14	0.72	11	0.01	9	0.16	9	0.43	26	0.28	4	0.35
Nadelmann 1956		27	0.69	46	0.00	33	0.09	34	0.09	27	0.20	28	0.13
Ohlsson 1999		53	0.61	27	0.00	53	0.05	49	0.05	45	0.05	47	0.05
Olejniczac 1990		23	0.70	47	0.00	20	0.06	18	0.30	37	0.07	26	0.14
Olejniczak 1991		15	0.72	33	0.00	26	0.07	25	0.23	36	0.09	24	0.14
Osinska 1989		4	0.75	3	0.09	2	0.21	2	0.60	27	0.28	2	0.41
Paderewski 1912		52	0.61	36	0.00	38	0.09	33	0.09	41	0.06	41	0.07
Perahia 1994		57	0.58	26	0.00	58	0.04	56	0.04	60	0.04	60	0.04
Perlemuter 1986		59	0.54	49	0.00	61	0.07	37	0.07	32	0.15	34	0.10
Poblocka 1999		3	0.76	22	0.00	7	0.17	7	0.48	35	0.09	14	0.21
Rangell 2001		6	0.74	35	0.00	16	0.07	17	0.31	33	0.09	21	0.17
Risler 1920		44	0.64	16	0.01	28	0.06	22	0.25	11	0.47	5	0.34
Rosen 1989		47	0.63	60	0.00	51	0.03	63	0.03	35	0.07	51	0.05
Rubinstein 1939		41	0.65	6	0.03	15	0.10	32	0.16	20	0.27	15	0.21
Rubinstein 1952		54	0.60	45	0.00	55	0.03	60	0.03	57	0.04	66	0.03
Rubinstein 1966		50	0.62	25	0.00	41	0.04	51	0.04	33	0.07	48	0.05
Rummel 1943		49	0.63	41	0.00	30	0.07	30	0.21	35	0.07	30	0.12
Shebanova 2002		56	0.59	29	0.00	52	0.03	61	0.03	49	0.05	58	0.04
Smith 1975		13	0.72	38	0.00	18	0.08	10	0.41	29	0.17	10	0.26
Szpilman 1948		42	0.65	42	0.00	37	0.07	36	0.07	35	0.07	40	0.07
Uninsky 1971		7	0.74	13	0.01	6	0.12	6	0.50	25	0.33	3	0.41
Wasowski 1980		35	0.67	21	0.00	39	0.06	40	0.06	51	0.05	45	0.05
Weissenberg 1971		8	0.73	30	0.00	24	0.06	19	0.28	40	0.07	25	0.14
Average		1	0.81	1	0.48	1	0.48	1	0.68	48	0.05	17	0.18
Random 1		65	0.00	58	0.00	64	0.02	64	0.02	19	0.38	38	0.09
Random 2		64	0.00	55	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	32	0.07	59	0.04
Random 3		66	-0.01	43	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	25	0.17	62	0.04

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).