Uninsky 1971

Performance0-Rank  0-Score1-Rank  1-Score2-Rank  2-Score3-Rank  3-Score3R-Rank  3R-Score4-Rank  4-Score  NED
Afanassiev 2001   30  0.7016  0.0129  0.0729  0.194  0.6024  0.34
Ashkenazy 1981   20  0.7451  0.0024  0.1025  0.3232  0.2130  0.26
Beliavsky 2004   24  0.7417  0.0126  0.1124  0.334  0.5114  0.41
BenOr 1989   4  0.791  0.261  0.251  0.756  0.621  0.68
Biret 1990   16  0.7513  0.019  0.0816  0.4231  0.2327  0.31
Blet 2003   41  0.6829  0.0034  0.0640  0.0623  0.2244  0.11
Block 1995   6  0.783  0.143  0.197  0.552  0.596  0.57
Brailowsky 1960   36  0.6836  0.0032  0.0632  0.128  0.5331  0.25
Chiu 1999   15  0.7538  0.0012  0.0811  0.4816  0.4810  0.48
Clidat 1994   26  0.7214  0.0127  0.1326  0.285  0.5219  0.38
Cohen 1997   47  0.6453  0.0047  0.0452  0.0417  0.2846  0.11
Coop 1987   17  0.7520  0.0021  0.0918  0.4226  0.4115  0.41
Cortot 1951   34  0.6939  0.0042  0.0735  0.0727  0.1748  0.11
Czerny 1949   33  0.6944  0.0037  0.0738  0.0724  0.2836  0.14
Czerny 1949b   38  0.6824  0.0038  0.0643  0.0632  0.2142  0.11
Ezaki 2006   25  0.7337  0.0025  0.0923  0.3525  0.3621  0.35
Falvay 1989   21  0.7441  0.0017  0.1110  0.5010  0.548  0.52
Ferenczy 1958   56  0.6148  0.0055  0.0361  0.0339  0.0561  0.04
Fiorentino 1962   5  0.7819  0.006  0.333  0.6612  0.574  0.61
Fliere 1977   9  0.766  0.0511  0.086  0.5510  0.577  0.56
Fou 1978   31  0.7054  0.0036  0.0641  0.0632  0.1549  0.09
Francois 1956   62  0.4927  0.0061  0.0456  0.0415  0.5137  0.14
Hatto 1997   43  0.6730  0.0046  0.0454  0.0446  0.0660  0.05
Horowitz 1971   39  0.6812  0.0131  0.0731  0.155  0.5029  0.27
Horowitz 1985   53  0.6228  0.0033  0.0642  0.065  0.4533  0.16
Indjic 2001   37  0.6846  0.0043  0.0734  0.0735  0.0757  0.07
Kapell 1951   23  0.7433  0.0020  0.1117  0.4227  0.2822  0.34
Kiepura 1999   44  0.6663  0.0048  0.0548  0.0522  0.3638  0.13
Kilenyi 1937   7  0.7711  0.027  0.218  0.5219  0.529  0.52
Kissin 1993   19  0.7415  0.0116  0.1015  0.4327  0.2723  0.34
Kitain 1937   60  0.5755  0.0054  0.0459  0.0419  0.3347  0.11
Kushner 1990   61  0.5462  0.0062  0.0551  0.0544  0.0559  0.05
Levy 1951   22  0.748  0.0422  0.1022  0.3626  0.3125  0.33
Luisada 1990   35  0.6960  0.0041  0.0736  0.0730  0.1645  0.11
Lushtak 2004   50  0.6342  0.0058  0.0457  0.0448  0.0562  0.04
Lympany 1968   55  0.6156  0.0052  0.0453  0.0432  0.1155  0.07
Magaloff 1977   1  0.805  0.065  0.315  0.6410  0.565  0.60
Magaloff 1977b   2  0.804  0.064  0.174  0.659  0.573  0.61
Magin 1975   14  0.7525  0.0013  0.0719  0.4016  0.5113  0.45
Milkina 1970   46  0.6522  0.0050  0.0549  0.0520  0.2343  0.11
Mohovich 1999   28  0.7035  0.0030  0.0830  0.1625  0.3032  0.22
Nadelmann 1956   29  0.7032  0.0028  0.0828  0.2217  0.3728  0.29
Ohlsson 1999   45  0.6561  0.0044  0.0547  0.0529  0.1851  0.09
Olejniczac 1990   3  0.792  0.172  0.242  0.6811  0.582  0.63
Olejniczak 1991   12  0.7640  0.0014  0.0914  0.4523  0.4612  0.45
Osinska 1989   10  0.769  0.038  0.169  0.5120  0.4011  0.45
Paderewski 1912   42  0.6859  0.0039  0.0639  0.0619  0.4334  0.16
Perahia 1994   58  0.6034  0.0059  0.0458  0.0455  0.0463  0.04
Perlemuter 1986   59  0.5826  0.0060  0.0455  0.0430  0.1852  0.08
Poblocka 1999   11  0.7623  0.0010  0.0812  0.4830  0.3316  0.40
Rangell 2001   18  0.7545  0.0019  0.0921  0.3725  0.4417  0.40
Risler 1920   57  0.6049  0.0051  0.0550  0.0525  0.2541  0.11
Rosen 1989   49  0.6350  0.0053  0.0644  0.0623  0.2840  0.13
Rubinstein 1939   48  0.6447  0.0049  0.0737  0.0723  0.2439  0.13
Rubinstein 1952   51  0.6218  0.0156  0.0362  0.0347  0.0564  0.04
Rubinstein 1966   54  0.6252  0.0057  0.0360  0.0358  0.0465  0.03
Rummel 1943   40  0.6857  0.0018  0.0827  0.244  0.5620  0.37
Shebanova 2002   52  0.627  0.0445  0.0546  0.0530  0.1253  0.08
Smith 1975   13  0.7510  0.0223  0.1120  0.4026  0.2726  0.33
Szpilman 1948   32  0.6943  0.0040  0.0733  0.0725  0.2735  0.14
Uninsky 1971   target  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  target
Wasowski 1980   27  0.7131  0.0035  0.0645  0.0639  0.0758  0.06
Weissenberg 1971   8  0.7721  0.0015  0.0913  0.4723  0.3318  0.39
Random 1    64  0.0058  0.0064  0.0264  0.0216  0.3950  0.09
Random 2   63  0.0464  0.0063  0.0263  0.0219  0.2256  0.07
Random 3   65  0.0065  0.0065  0.0265  0.0216  0.3154  0.08

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

  • Performance:
  • 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
  • 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
  • 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
  • NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

  • red = strongly similar performance to target
  • orange = moderately similar performance
  • yellow = weakly similar performance
  • green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
  • white = dissimilar to target
  • blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).