Szpilman 1948

Performance0-Rank  0-Score1-Rank  1-Score2-Rank  2-Score3-Rank  3-Score3R-Rank  3R-Score4-Rank  4-Score  NED
Afanassiev 2001   51  0.5932  0.0055  0.0551  0.0555  0.0461  0.04
Ashkenazy 1981   20  0.7154  0.0022  0.1122  0.3937  0.0926  0.19
Beliavsky 2004   39  0.6541  0.0038  0.0734  0.0735  0.0743  0.07
BenOr 1989   19  0.7144  0.0020  0.1418  0.4536  0.0827  0.19
Biret 1990   2  0.792  0.192  0.423  0.6518  0.446  0.53
Blet 2003   40  0.6543  0.0047  0.0736  0.0736  0.0645  0.06
Block 1995   15  0.7357  0.0021  0.1219  0.4515  0.4014  0.42
Brailowsky 1960   42  0.6413  0.0143  0.0553  0.0529  0.1938  0.10
Chiu 1999   32  0.6728  0.0035  0.0739  0.0734  0.0941  0.08
Clidat 1994   28  0.6820  0.0032  0.0832  0.1520  0.3125  0.22
Cohen 1997   55  0.5733  0.0054  0.0362  0.0343  0.0563  0.04
Coop 1987   12  0.7445  0.0014  0.1415  0.5227  0.3913  0.45
Cortot 1951   14  0.736  0.0216  0.1614  0.5310  0.529  0.52
Czerny 1949   13  0.738  0.029  0.146  0.589  0.602  0.59
Czerny 1949b   30  0.6712  0.0125  0.1127  0.2524  0.3121  0.28
Ezaki 2006   23  0.7046  0.0023  0.1123  0.3139  0.0828  0.16
Falvay 1989   37  0.6561  0.0046  0.0549  0.0549  0.0550  0.05
Ferenczy 1958   47  0.627  0.027  0.1220  0.427  0.5611  0.48
Fiorentino 1962   10  0.7431  0.0015  0.1413  0.5426  0.3215  0.42
Fliere 1977   22  0.7051  0.0026  0.0926  0.2529  0.2024  0.22
Fou 1978   21  0.7016  0.0019  0.1117  0.4728  0.2319  0.33
Francois 1956   62  0.3435  0.0062  0.0647  0.0659  0.0457  0.05
Hatto 1997   45  0.6365  0.0052  0.0550  0.0550  0.0653  0.05
Horowitz 1971   49  0.6122  0.0042  0.0555  0.0548  0.0556  0.05
Horowitz 1985   53  0.5823  0.0040  0.0554  0.0513  0.3632  0.13
Indjic 2001   33  0.6626  0.0044  0.0458  0.0436  0.0754  0.05
Kapell 1951   6  0.7514  0.005  0.1510  0.5526  0.2917  0.40
Kiepura 1999   56  0.5629  0.0059  0.0642  0.0659  0.0449  0.05
Kilenyi 1937   7  0.759  0.0110  0.144  0.6018  0.534  0.56
Kissin 1993   1  0.831  0.511  0.501  0.794  0.671  0.73
Kitain 1937   58  0.5410  0.0156  0.0460  0.0415  0.4233  0.13
Kushner 1990   57  0.5525  0.0058  0.0456  0.0456  0.0458  0.04
Levy 1951   4  0.754  0.034  0.205  0.5912  0.515  0.55
Luisada 1990   35  0.6658  0.0033  0.0740  0.0740  0.0744  0.07
Lushtak 2004   52  0.5952  0.0057  0.0459  0.0459  0.0462  0.04
Lympany 1968   38  0.6536  0.0045  0.0738  0.0719  0.2531  0.13
Magaloff 1977   24  0.7064  0.0028  0.1124  0.2836  0.0829  0.15
Magaloff 1977b   26  0.6937  0.0030  0.0828  0.2246  0.0637  0.11
Magin 1975   36  0.6650  0.0034  0.0643  0.0632  0.2136  0.11
Milkina 1970   41  0.6449  0.0039  0.0644  0.0651  0.0551  0.05
Mohovich 1999   31  0.6734  0.0036  0.0833  0.0856  0.0548  0.06
Nadelmann 1956   54  0.5759  0.0050  0.0641  0.0648  0.0452  0.05
Ohlsson 1999   29  0.6811  0.0129  0.0730  0.1912  0.4320  0.29
Olejniczac 1990   8  0.7556  0.0013  0.1511  0.5431  0.2318  0.35
Olejniczak 1991   17  0.7227  0.0017  0.1916  0.5025  0.4012  0.45
Osinska 1989   27  0.6839  0.0031  0.0831  0.1839  0.0734  0.11
Paderewski 1912   16  0.723  0.076  0.149  0.564  0.633  0.59
Perahia 1994   61  0.4960  0.0053  0.0461  0.0460  0.0364  0.03
Perlemuter 1986   59  0.5248  0.0060  0.0552  0.0556  0.0459  0.04
Poblocka 1999   3  0.785  0.033  0.212  0.6725  0.407  0.52
Rangell 2001   11  0.7430  0.0011  0.148  0.5722  0.478  0.52
Risler 1920   50  0.6163  0.0051  0.0646  0.0630  0.1935  0.11
Rosen 1989   60  0.5055  0.0061  0.0645  0.0643  0.0647  0.06
Rubinstein 1939   46  0.6219  0.0041  0.0457  0.0422  0.2639  0.10
Rubinstein 1952   34  0.6642  0.0037  0.0735  0.0729  0.1540  0.10
Rubinstein 1966   48  0.6140  0.0048  0.0548  0.0551  0.0460  0.04
Rummel 1943   44  0.6315  0.0024  0.0829  0.2117  0.3423  0.27
Shebanova 2002   43  0.6421  0.0049  0.0737  0.0731  0.1042  0.08
Smith 1975   9  0.7418  0.008  0.137  0.5816  0.4010  0.48
Szpilman 1948   target  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  target
Uninsky 1971   25  0.6917  0.0027  0.0925  0.2733  0.0730  0.14
Wasowski 1980   18  0.7238  0.0018  0.1021  0.4030  0.1822  0.27
Weissenberg 1971   5  0.7524  0.0012  0.1712  0.5427  0.2916  0.40
Random 1    65  -0.0447  0.0065  0.0265  0.0258  0.0365  0.02
Random 2   63  0.0453  0.0063  0.0363  0.0330  0.1146  0.06
Random 3   64  -0.0162  0.0064  0.0264  0.0227  0.1555  0.05

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

  • Performance:
  • 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
  • 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
  • 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
  • NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

  • red = strongly similar performance to target
  • orange = moderately similar performance
  • yellow = weakly similar performance
  • green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
  • white = dissimilar to target
  • blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).