Poblocka 1999

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		42	0.73	36	0.00	51	0.07	42	0.07	26	0.22	51	0.12
Ashkenazy 1981		6	0.84	3	0.10	13	0.12	5	0.64	2	0.65	4	0.64
Beliavsky 2004		34	0.76	22	0.01	34	0.09	35	0.09	6	0.48	36	0.21
BenOr 1989		9	0.84	28	0.00	18	0.10	10	0.55	9	0.58	17	0.56
Biret 1990		2	0.87	7	0.05	4	0.21	2	0.67	1	0.70	3	0.68
Blet 2003		46	0.70	37	0.00	50	0.06	46	0.06	19	0.27	48	0.13
Block 1995		19	0.81	39	0.00	27	0.12	27	0.36	5	0.56	30	0.45
Brailowsky 1960		50	0.69	55	0.00	54	0.06	52	0.06	45	0.06	58	0.06
Chiu 1999		26	0.80	26	0.01	22	0.16	21	0.48	8	0.55	22	0.51
Clidat 1994		44	0.73	52	0.00	48	0.06	48	0.06	22	0.28	50	0.13
Cohen 1997		43	0.73	54	0.00	49	0.07	43	0.07	9	0.37	42	0.16
Coop 1987		3	0.87	1	0.21	1	0.21	4	0.65	2	0.75	1	0.70
Cortot 1951		35	0.76	43	0.00	40	0.12	33	0.12	18	0.35	39	0.20
Czerny 1949		18	0.82	24	0.01	21	0.12	18	0.49	2	0.68	11	0.58
Czerny 1949b		38	0.74	56	0.00	32	0.09	32	0.18	14	0.49	32	0.30
Ezaki 2006		1	0.88	2	0.15	3	0.23	9	0.56	6	0.63	7	0.59
Falvay 1989		21	0.81	15	0.01	26	0.09	26	0.39	5	0.61	24	0.49
Ferenczy 1958		53	0.66	34	0.00	43	0.05	55	0.05	17	0.33	49	0.13
Fiorentino 1962		23	0.80	58	0.00	16	0.19	13	0.53	8	0.64	13	0.58
Fliere 1977		29	0.79	46	0.00	31	0.15	28	0.35	7	0.63	27	0.47
Fou 1978		25	0.80	9	0.02	17	0.09	24	0.42	4	0.61	23	0.51
Francois 1956		62	0.44	51	0.00	62	0.06	49	0.06	49	0.06	61	0.06
Hatto 1997		32	0.77	47	0.00	38	0.09	37	0.09	6	0.58	34	0.23
Horowitz 1971		58	0.61	44	0.00	58	0.05	58	0.05	44	0.06	62	0.05
Horowitz 1985		60	0.55	32	0.00	59	0.05	54	0.05	36	0.07	57	0.06
Indjic 2001		22	0.81	27	0.00	30	0.11	29	0.34	5	0.62	28	0.46
Kapell 1951		17	0.82	41	0.00	15	0.12	20	0.48	7	0.49	26	0.48
Kiepura 1999		37	0.74	50	0.00	45	0.05	61	0.05	6	0.55	41	0.17
Kilenyi 1937		20	0.81	25	0.01	10	0.14	8	0.56	2	0.72	6	0.63
Kissin 1993		12	0.82	14	0.01	14	0.11	11	0.55	7	0.63	8	0.59
Kitain 1937		61	0.47	31	0.00	61	0.05	53	0.05	60	0.04	63	0.04
Kushner 1990		54	0.65	45	0.00	53	0.04	62	0.04	15	0.42	47	0.13
Levy 1951		28	0.79	23	0.01	20	0.11	16	0.51	4	0.67	10	0.58
Luisada 1990		8	0.84	21	0.01	7	0.11	19	0.49	6	0.63	16	0.56
Lushtak 2004		47	0.70	20	0.01	47	0.05	56	0.05	12	0.46	45	0.15
Lympany 1968		51	0.68	49	0.00	55	0.09	39	0.09	22	0.24	43	0.15
Magaloff 1977		11	0.82	5	0.06	6	0.12	6	0.58	8	0.59	12	0.58
Magaloff 1977b		15	0.82	10	0.02	11	0.19	7	0.57	8	0.58	14	0.57
Magin 1975		16	0.82	18	0.01	23	0.16	23	0.44	13	0.55	25	0.49
Milkina 1970		40	0.73	12	0.01	42	0.05	60	0.05	22	0.21	52	0.10
Mohovich 1999		24	0.80	33	0.00	28	0.10	31	0.32	4	0.65	29	0.46
Nadelmann 1956		45	0.72	64	0.00	39	0.09	36	0.09	12	0.41	40	0.19
Ohlsson 1999		36	0.75	19	0.01	36	0.09	38	0.09	8	0.53	35	0.22
Olejniczac 1990		13	0.82	35	0.00	9	0.14	12	0.54	10	0.59	15	0.56
Olejniczak 1991		10	0.83	8	0.03	8	0.12	14	0.53	10	0.57	18	0.55
Osinska 1989		5	0.86	6	0.05	5	0.13	3	0.66	3	0.70	2	0.68
Paderewski 1912		48	0.70	48	0.00	37	0.08	41	0.08	9	0.56	37	0.21
Perahia 1994		57	0.62	30	0.00	52	0.05	59	0.05	30	0.11	56	0.07
Perlemuter 1986		59	0.59	57	0.00	60	0.06	47	0.06	44	0.07	59	0.06
Poblocka 1999		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rangell 2001		7	0.84	59	0.00	12	0.13	17	0.51	8	0.58	19	0.54
Risler 1920		49	0.69	62	0.00	35	0.08	40	0.08	4	0.52	38	0.20
Rosen 1989		55	0.64	42	0.00	57	0.06	45	0.06	40	0.06	60	0.06
Rubinstein 1939		56	0.63	38	0.00	56	0.07	44	0.07	34	0.08	54	0.07
Rubinstein 1952		39	0.74	11	0.02	41	0.06	50	0.06	20	0.33	46	0.14
Rubinstein 1966		41	0.73	53	0.00	44	0.06	51	0.06	16	0.40	44	0.15
Rummel 1943		52	0.66	63	0.00	46	0.05	57	0.05	25	0.20	53	0.10
Shebanova 2002		30	0.78	13	0.01	33	0.10	34	0.10	2	0.71	33	0.27
Smith 1975		27	0.79	29	0.00	24	0.12	22	0.47	7	0.60	20	0.53
Szpilman 1948		31	0.78	16	0.01	25	0.09	25	0.40	2	0.67	21	0.52
Uninsky 1971		33	0.76	40	0.00	29	0.10	30	0.33	12	0.48	31	0.40
Wasowski 1980		14	0.82	17	0.01	19	0.12	15	0.51	2	0.67	9	0.58
Weissenberg 1971		4	0.86	4	0.09	2	0.19	1	0.67	4	0.60	5	0.63
Random 1		65	-0.03	61	0.00	64	0.02	64	0.02	43	0.04	64	0.03
Random 2		63	0.02	65	0.00	63	0.03	63	0.03	23	0.16	55	0.07
Random 3		64	-0.02	60	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	59	0.03	65	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).