Osinska 1989

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		44	0.71	50	0.00	47	0.06	48	0.06	13	0.36	46	0.15
Ashkenazy 1981		5	0.83	13	0.01	14	0.17	4	0.65	6	0.59	9	0.62
Beliavsky 2004		31	0.75	11	0.01	24	0.11	26	0.29	1	0.60	24	0.42
BenOr 1989		8	0.83	25	0.00	15	0.19	10	0.59	11	0.57	12	0.58
Biret 1990		4	0.84	15	0.00	6	0.27	5	0.65	7	0.66	6	0.65
Blet 2003		45	0.71	44	0.00	49	0.06	51	0.06	25	0.19	51	0.11
Block 1995		32	0.75	52	0.00	37	0.06	50	0.06	24	0.30	48	0.13
Brailowsky 1960		52	0.66	54	0.00	53	0.05	59	0.05	41	0.07	57	0.06
Chiu 1999		22	0.78	42	0.00	26	0.10	19	0.42	10	0.51	19	0.46
Clidat 1994		38	0.74	29	0.00	41	0.06	47	0.06	7	0.48	44	0.17
Cohen 1997		41	0.73	39	0.00	43	0.07	45	0.07	2	0.63	36	0.21
Coop 1987		10	0.81	38	0.00	12	0.12	15	0.53	10	0.59	14	0.56
Cortot 1951		29	0.76	56	0.00	35	0.14	33	0.14	5	0.55	33	0.28
Czerny 1949		15	0.80	12	0.01	7	0.12	12	0.57	1	0.68	8	0.62
Czerny 1949b		37	0.74	21	0.00	34	0.11	34	0.11	7	0.57	34	0.25
Ezaki 2006		2	0.86	4	0.05	2	0.25	2	0.72	1	0.82	1	0.77
Falvay 1989		16	0.80	6	0.03	22	0.10	23	0.37	4	0.62	17	0.48
Ferenczy 1958		53	0.66	45	0.00	55	0.04	62	0.04	27	0.21	55	0.09
Fiorentino 1962		17	0.80	53	0.00	9	0.11	11	0.58	10	0.63	10	0.60
Fliere 1977		28	0.76	40	0.00	33	0.11	35	0.11	15	0.50	35	0.23
Fou 1978		24	0.77	48	0.00	29	0.10	24	0.33	17	0.42	27	0.37
Francois 1956		62	0.49	46	0.00	62	0.06	49	0.06	30	0.19	52	0.11
Hatto 1997		42	0.73	22	0.00	46	0.09	36	0.09	20	0.32	43	0.17
Horowitz 1971		58	0.59	60	0.00	59	0.05	58	0.05	60	0.04	63	0.04
Horowitz 1985		60	0.55	16	0.00	54	0.04	61	0.04	41	0.07	59	0.05
Indjic 2001		33	0.74	27	0.00	38	0.05	55	0.05	25	0.22	54	0.10
Kapell 1951		20	0.79	23	0.00	21	0.09	18	0.46	13	0.42	22	0.44
Kiepura 1999		43	0.72	28	0.00	50	0.07	43	0.07	11	0.52	39	0.19
Kilenyi 1937		34	0.74	63	0.00	30	0.11	27	0.28	22	0.48	29	0.37
Kissin 1993		23	0.77	41	0.00	19	0.09	16	0.48	14	0.44	20	0.46
Kitain 1937		61	0.51	49	0.00	60	0.05	57	0.05	52	0.05	62	0.05
Kushner 1990		48	0.69	33	0.00	52	0.07	40	0.07	10	0.58	37	0.20
Levy 1951		30	0.76	9	0.01	23	0.08	25	0.29	22	0.43	30	0.35
Luisada 1990		13	0.81	26	0.00	20	0.09	17	0.47	7	0.60	16	0.53
Lushtak 2004		36	0.74	5	0.04	17	0.09	31	0.19	2	0.65	31	0.35
Lympany 1968		55	0.65	64	0.00	57	0.05	52	0.05	37	0.07	56	0.06
Magaloff 1977		6	0.83	7	0.02	4	0.20	6	0.62	4	0.70	4	0.66
Magaloff 1977b		7	0.83	19	0.00	5	0.18	8	0.61	4	0.69	5	0.65
Magin 1975		19	0.79	17	0.00	31	0.11	29	0.23	9	0.58	26	0.37
Milkina 1970		35	0.74	37	0.00	44	0.07	42	0.07	14	0.37	45	0.16
Mohovich 1999		21	0.78	20	0.00	28	0.09	21	0.40	7	0.57	18	0.48
Nadelmann 1956		40	0.73	61	0.00	36	0.08	38	0.08	15	0.39	41	0.18
Ohlsson 1999		47	0.69	35	0.00	39	0.05	56	0.05	26	0.28	49	0.12
Olejniczac 1990		12	0.81	43	0.00	8	0.10	9	0.59	12	0.57	11	0.58
Olejniczak 1991		14	0.81	32	0.00	10	0.11	14	0.54	8	0.59	13	0.56
Osinska 1989		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Paderewski 1912		51	0.67	58	0.00	40	0.05	54	0.05	17	0.43	47	0.15
Perahia 1994		49	0.68	18	0.00	51	0.08	37	0.08	6	0.44	40	0.19
Perlemuter 1986		59	0.56	57	0.00	61	0.05	53	0.05	49	0.06	61	0.05
Poblocka 1999		3	0.86	2	0.15	3	0.37	3	0.70	3	0.66	3	0.68
Rangell 2001		9	0.82	24	0.00	11	0.11	13	0.54	9	0.58	15	0.56
Risler 1920		54	0.65	36	0.00	42	0.07	41	0.07	18	0.43	42	0.17
Rosen 1989		46	0.70	34	0.00	48	0.07	44	0.07	4	0.56	38	0.20
Rubinstein 1939		56	0.64	55	0.00	56	0.04	60	0.04	41	0.06	60	0.05
Rubinstein 1952		25	0.77	14	0.01	18	0.08	28	0.25	3	0.60	25	0.39
Rubinstein 1966		26	0.77	31	0.00	32	0.11	30	0.22	6	0.62	28	0.37
Rummel 1943		57	0.61	62	0.00	58	0.06	46	0.06	37	0.06	58	0.06
Shebanova 2002		39	0.74	3	0.05	25	0.08	32	0.17	8	0.53	32	0.30
Smith 1975		11	0.81	10	0.01	13	0.17	7	0.62	2	0.66	7	0.64
Szpilman 1948		50	0.68	51	0.00	45	0.07	39	0.07	31	0.18	50	0.11
Uninsky 1971		27	0.76	8	0.01	16	0.10	20	0.40	9	0.51	21	0.45
Wasowski 1980		18	0.79	30	0.00	27	0.09	22	0.38	16	0.47	23	0.42
Weissenberg 1971		1	0.87	1	0.55	1	0.54	1	0.79	1	0.73	2	0.76
Random 1		63	0.00	59	0.00	63	0.03	63	0.03	22	0.34	53	0.10
Random 2		64	0.00	47	0.00	64	0.03	64	0.03	59	0.03	64	0.03
Random 3		65	-0.08	65	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	65	0.02	65	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).