Olejniczac 1990

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		36	0.71	33	0.00	47	0.06	47	0.06	9	0.44	39	0.16
Ashkenazy 1981		20	0.78	38	0.00	19	0.14	18	0.47	15	0.49	19	0.48
Beliavsky 2004		39	0.70	23	0.00	35	0.07	36	0.07	17	0.32	42	0.15
BenOr 1989		4	0.83	8	0.00	4	0.18	3	0.74	1	0.74	4	0.74
Biret 1990		3	0.85	9	0.00	3	0.27	6	0.69	5	0.67	7	0.68
Blet 2003		22	0.77	47	0.00	11	0.12	27	0.32	5	0.67	21	0.46
Block 1995		25	0.77	30	0.00	22	0.13	26	0.33	3	0.58	24	0.44
Brailowsky 1960		48	0.68	39	0.00	50	0.04	62	0.04	26	0.23	53	0.10
Chiu 1999		13	0.79	15	0.00	15	0.14	15	0.53	3	0.60	16	0.56
Clidat 1994		38	0.70	20	0.00	48	0.07	37	0.07	23	0.25	46	0.13
Cohen 1997		42	0.70	56	0.00	52	0.04	59	0.04	27	0.17	58	0.08
Coop 1987		27	0.76	17	0.00	23	0.09	22	0.38	16	0.52	23	0.44
Cortot 1951		30	0.75	57	0.00	34	0.09	35	0.09	12	0.48	35	0.21
Czerny 1949		31	0.75	48	0.00	28	0.08	28	0.32	10	0.58	25	0.43
Czerny 1949b		47	0.68	49	0.00	33	0.11	33	0.11	16	0.47	32	0.23
Ezaki 2006		15	0.79	28	0.00	21	0.14	20	0.41	16	0.50	22	0.45
Falvay 1989		17	0.79	58	0.00	31	0.11	30	0.24	8	0.55	30	0.36
Ferenczy 1958		59	0.60	26	0.00	60	0.06	44	0.06	52	0.04	62	0.05
Fiorentino 1962		1	0.98	1	0.99	1	0.98	1	0.99	1	1.00	1	0.99
Fliere 1977		5	0.82	10	0.00	9	0.16	4	0.72	2	0.79	3	0.75
Fou 1978		26	0.76	50	0.00	25	0.09	21	0.38	11	0.47	27	0.42
Francois 1956		62	0.46	11	0.00	62	0.06	46	0.06	32	0.17	55	0.10
Hatto 1997		46	0.68	13	0.00	53	0.05	53	0.05	42	0.06	61	0.05
Horowitz 1971		51	0.65	2	0.00	38	0.07	39	0.07	13	0.36	40	0.16
Horowitz 1985		60	0.57	24	0.00	56	0.04	58	0.04	23	0.26	52	0.10
Indjic 2001		34	0.73	31	0.00	41	0.06	43	0.06	29	0.19	51	0.11
Kapell 1951		14	0.79	12	0.00	16	0.18	19	0.46	10	0.47	20	0.46
Kiepura 1999		45	0.69	5	0.00	49	0.04	56	0.04	12	0.48	43	0.14
Kilenyi 1937		18	0.78	3	0.00	12	0.13	8	0.63	1	0.72	8	0.67
Kissin 1993		10	0.81	7	0.00	5	0.19	5	0.71	3	0.71	5	0.71
Kitain 1937		61	0.51	51	0.00	61	0.05	51	0.05	50	0.05	63	0.05
Kushner 1990		54	0.63	59	0.00	55	0.05	48	0.05	28	0.23	50	0.11
Levy 1951		29	0.75	40	0.00	27	0.09	29	0.31	19	0.46	29	0.38
Luisada 1990		21	0.78	32	0.00	24	0.12	24	0.35	14	0.52	26	0.43
Lushtak 2004		43	0.69	60	0.00	51	0.04	61	0.04	16	0.36	49	0.12
Lympany 1968		41	0.70	4	0.00	42	0.05	49	0.05	7	0.56	36	0.17
Magaloff 1977		19	0.78	27	0.00	17	0.15	14	0.53	5	0.62	14	0.57
Magaloff 1977b		23	0.77	41	0.00	20	0.12	17	0.49	6	0.60	17	0.54
Magin 1975		9	0.82	42	0.00	13	0.12	13	0.55	4	0.64	10	0.59
Milkina 1970		35	0.72	43	0.00	43	0.06	42	0.06	28	0.15	56	0.09
Mohovich 1999		24	0.77	14	0.00	18	0.13	16	0.50	2	0.68	13	0.58
Nadelmann 1956		16	0.79	52	0.00	26	0.08	23	0.36	4	0.66	18	0.49
Ohlsson 1999		44	0.69	61	0.00	36	0.10	34	0.10	11	0.44	34	0.21
Olejniczac 1990		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Olejniczak 1991		2	0.86	25	0.00	2	0.61	2	0.76	1	0.78	2	0.77
Osinska 1989		11	0.81	44	0.00	14	0.16	12	0.57	9	0.59	12	0.58
Paderewski 1912		50	0.66	63	0.00	46	0.05	52	0.05	27	0.29	48	0.12
Perahia 1994		55	0.63	6	0.00	37	0.07	38	0.07	8	0.40	38	0.17
Perlemuter 1986		56	0.63	64	0.00	59	0.05	55	0.05	28	0.21	54	0.10
Poblocka 1999		6	0.82	18	0.00	6	0.17	10	0.59	12	0.54	15	0.56
Rangell 2001		8	0.82	53	0.00	8	0.17	7	0.66	1	0.73	6	0.69
Risler 1920		57	0.62	21	0.00	45	0.05	54	0.05	13	0.47	41	0.15
Rosen 1989		53	0.64	29	0.00	58	0.04	60	0.04	33	0.08	59	0.06
Rubinstein 1939		58	0.61	19	0.00	57	0.04	57	0.04	36	0.07	60	0.05
Rubinstein 1952		40	0.70	22	0.00	39	0.05	50	0.05	15	0.39	45	0.14
Rubinstein 1966		49	0.67	34	0.00	54	0.06	40	0.06	32	0.13	57	0.09
Rummel 1943		52	0.64	16	0.00	40	0.06	41	0.06	10	0.47	37	0.17
Shebanova 2002		37	0.70	45	0.00	44	0.06	45	0.06	14	0.35	44	0.14
Smith 1975		33	0.74	54	0.00	32	0.09	32	0.18	27	0.24	33	0.21
Szpilman 1948		32	0.75	35	0.00	30	0.08	31	0.23	11	0.54	31	0.35
Uninsky 1971		12	0.79	36	0.00	10	0.13	11	0.58	2	0.68	9	0.63
Wasowski 1980		28	0.76	62	0.00	29	0.11	25	0.34	15	0.47	28	0.40
Weissenberg 1971		7	0.82	37	0.00	7	0.13	9	0.62	8	0.56	11	0.59
Random 1		63	0.03	65	0.00	63	0.03	63	0.03	9	0.51	47	0.12
Random 2		64	0.03	55	0.00	64	0.02	64	0.02	45	0.04	64	0.03
Random 3		65	-0.01	46	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	42	0.05	65	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).