Kilenyi 1937

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		41	0.66	6	0.03	41	0.06	47	0.06	12	0.37	38	0.15
Ashkenazy 1981		5	0.80	16	0.01	10	0.18	4	0.69	7	0.56	7	0.62
Beliavsky 2004		33	0.70	42	0.00	35	0.12	34	0.12	19	0.29	34	0.19
BenOr 1989		10	0.79	18	0.01	9	0.15	5	0.68	10	0.57	8	0.62
Biret 1990		4	0.81	5	0.06	4	0.19	8	0.67	13	0.53	9	0.60
Blet 2003		50	0.62	25	0.01	48	0.05	51	0.05	41	0.06	51	0.05
Block 1995		28	0.73	32	0.00	28	0.09	30	0.28	23	0.31	29	0.29
Brailowsky 1960		39	0.67	19	0.01	40	0.07	42	0.07	16	0.36	36	0.16
Chiu 1999		14	0.78	12	0.02	7	0.13	17	0.54	9	0.53	17	0.53
Clidat 1994		43	0.64	60	0.00	44	0.07	45	0.07	44	0.05	50	0.06
Cohen 1997		58	0.58	61	0.00	57	0.04	56	0.04	39	0.07	54	0.05
Coop 1987		13	0.78	59	0.00	14	0.15	15	0.57	13	0.55	13	0.56
Cortot 1951		37	0.68	63	0.00	38	0.09	37	0.09	38	0.06	47	0.07
Czerny 1949		22	0.75	51	0.00	23	0.13	16	0.55	7	0.62	11	0.58
Czerny 1949b		30	0.72	50	0.00	30	0.14	29	0.29	18	0.45	28	0.36
Ezaki 2006		16	0.77	7	0.03	15	0.14	21	0.50	18	0.47	21	0.48
Falvay 1989		34	0.69	49	0.00	36	0.12	33	0.12	40	0.06	41	0.08
Ferenczy 1958		54	0.60	30	0.00	52	0.04	57	0.04	49	0.04	59	0.04
Fiorentino 1962		20	0.76	28	0.00	17	0.16	7	0.67	11	0.60	5	0.63
Fliere 1977		18	0.76	20	0.01	24	0.13	11	0.58	9	0.59	10	0.58
Fou 1978		15	0.78	31	0.00	16	0.12	20	0.50	14	0.45	23	0.47
Francois 1956		62	0.34	48	0.00	62	0.06	50	0.06	63	0.03	62	0.04
Hatto 1997		48	0.63	45	0.00	46	0.04	54	0.04	47	0.06	52	0.05
Horowitz 1971		44	0.64	21	0.01	50	0.06	46	0.06	22	0.26	40	0.12
Horowitz 1985		49	0.62	62	0.00	49	0.06	49	0.06	11	0.39	37	0.15
Indjic 2001		42	0.66	53	0.00	42	0.08	41	0.08	45	0.06	46	0.07
Kapell 1951		19	0.76	58	0.00	20	0.17	24	0.46	20	0.38	26	0.42
Kiepura 1999		27	0.73	9	0.02	27	0.16	27	0.38	1	0.75	16	0.53
Kilenyi 1937		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Kissin 1993		3	0.81	3	0.10	3	0.18	3	0.69	8	0.62	2	0.65
Kitain 1937		61	0.51	23	0.01	59	0.04	58	0.04	38	0.07	55	0.05
Kushner 1990		55	0.60	34	0.00	51	0.05	53	0.05	34	0.08	48	0.06
Levy 1951		26	0.74	22	0.01	22	0.11	25	0.46	24	0.38	25	0.42
Luisada 1990		23	0.75	64	0.00	19	0.12	23	0.46	15	0.51	22	0.48
Lushtak 2004		56	0.60	46	0.00	58	0.06	48	0.06	54	0.05	53	0.05
Lympany 1968		57	0.60	33	0.00	55	0.04	60	0.04	55	0.04	56	0.04
Magaloff 1977		9	0.79	14	0.01	12	0.12	13	0.57	18	0.47	19	0.52
Magaloff 1977b		8	0.79	26	0.00	11	0.09	12	0.57	19	0.48	20	0.52
Magin 1975		7	0.79	8	0.02	8	0.14	10	0.60	3	0.65	6	0.62
Milkina 1970		46	0.63	27	0.00	53	0.03	62	0.03	59	0.04	63	0.03
Mohovich 1999		32	0.71	29	0.00	33	0.11	35	0.11	29	0.21	39	0.15
Nadelmann 1956		40	0.67	43	0.00	37	0.09	39	0.09	40	0.06	45	0.07
Ohlsson 1999		36	0.68	52	0.00	31	0.09	31	0.17	19	0.34	31	0.24
Olejniczac 1990		11	0.78	4	0.07	5	0.21	1	0.72	8	0.63	1	0.67
Olejniczak 1991		1	0.83	1	0.24	1	0.23	6	0.68	5	0.61	3	0.64
Osinska 1989		25	0.74	37	0.00	21	0.11	22	0.48	27	0.28	27	0.37
Paderewski 1912		35	0.69	44	0.00	34	0.09	40	0.09	18	0.43	32	0.20
Perahia 1994		53	0.61	41	0.00	47	0.05	52	0.05	28	0.14	42	0.08
Perlemuter 1986		60	0.53	24	0.01	61	0.07	43	0.07	43	0.07	44	0.07
Poblocka 1999		2	0.81	2	0.19	2	0.26	2	0.72	8	0.56	4	0.63
Rangell 2001		12	0.78	40	0.00	13	0.10	14	0.57	15	0.54	14	0.55
Risler 1920		45	0.63	56	0.00	39	0.09	38	0.09	20	0.36	35	0.18
Rosen 1989		59	0.56	47	0.00	60	0.04	55	0.04	57	0.04	60	0.04
Rubinstein 1939		52	0.61	36	0.00	54	0.03	61	0.03	44	0.05	57	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		38	0.67	17	0.01	43	0.10	36	0.10	36	0.06	43	0.08
Rubinstein 1966		51	0.61	13	0.01	56	0.04	59	0.04	50	0.05	58	0.04
Rummel 1943		31	0.71	11	0.02	32	0.08	32	0.16	5	0.54	30	0.29
Shebanova 2002		47	0.63	39	0.00	45	0.07	44	0.07	48	0.05	49	0.06
Smith 1975		29	0.72	57	0.00	29	0.12	28	0.31	33	0.12	33	0.19
Szpilman 1948		24	0.75	15	0.01	26	0.21	18	0.53	4	0.60	12	0.56
Uninsky 1971		17	0.77	10	0.02	18	0.14	19	0.52	8	0.52	18	0.52
Wasowski 1980		21	0.75	38	0.00	25	0.15	26	0.44	21	0.41	24	0.42
Weissenberg 1971		6	0.79	35	0.00	6	0.15	9	0.61	19	0.48	15	0.54
Random 1		65	-0.05	54	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	61	0.02	65	0.02
Random 2		63	0.02	55	0.00	63	0.03	63	0.03	47	0.03	64	0.03
Random 3		64	-0.02	65	0.00	64	0.02	64	0.02	32	0.10	61	0.04

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).