Horowitz 1971

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		54	0.57	59	0.00	51	0.06	47	0.06	62	0.03	62	0.04
Ashkenazy 1981		13	0.66	54	0.00	32	0.06	32	0.12	54	0.05	35	0.08
Beliavsky 2004		56	0.56	40	0.00	56	0.04	58	0.04	53	0.04	59	0.04
BenOr 1989		2	0.69	8	0.02	13	0.11	8	0.46	53	0.05	22	0.15
Biret 1990		16	0.65	20	0.01	21	0.09	23	0.25	53	0.05	28	0.11
Blet 2003		4	0.68	2	0.09	2	0.24	2	0.59	13	0.43	3	0.50
Block 1995		41	0.61	48	0.00	35	0.05	49	0.05	62	0.03	63	0.04
Brailowsky 1960		29	0.63	4	0.02	10	0.13	11	0.40	23	0.27	10	0.33
Chiu 1999		52	0.59	45	0.00	45	0.05	51	0.05	42	0.06	49	0.05
Clidat 1994		37	0.62	3	0.05	9	0.10	18	0.30	51	0.05	26	0.12
Cohen 1997		61	0.52	51	0.00	55	0.04	61	0.04	63	0.03	65	0.03
Coop 1987		57	0.55	62	0.00	60	0.04	59	0.04	60	0.05	60	0.04
Cortot 1951		20	0.64	53	0.00	33	0.06	42	0.06	52	0.04	56	0.05
Czerny 1949		58	0.55	60	0.00	61	0.06	46	0.06	48	0.06	39	0.06
Czerny 1949b		59	0.54	44	0.00	59	0.03	62	0.03	59	0.05	58	0.04
Ezaki 2006		53	0.57	39	0.00	58	0.05	55	0.05	58	0.05	44	0.05
Falvay 1989		46	0.61	58	0.00	42	0.07	41	0.07	61	0.04	50	0.05
Ferenczy 1958		17	0.64	30	0.00	19	0.08	14	0.33	6	0.56	4	0.43
Fiorentino 1962		25	0.64	5	0.02	23	0.08	28	0.18	40	0.06	32	0.10
Fliere 1977		12	0.66	25	0.00	29	0.07	26	0.20	49	0.05	29	0.10
Fou 1978		33	0.63	27	0.00	39	0.08	33	0.08	60	0.04	38	0.06
Francois 1956		60	0.54	28	0.00	52	0.05	56	0.05	11	0.55	19	0.17
Hatto 1997		50	0.59	64	0.00	50	0.05	54	0.05	57	0.04	61	0.04
Horowitz 1971		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Horowitz 1985		1	0.76	1	0.56	1	0.55	1	0.81	1	0.85	1	0.83
Indjic 2001		48	0.60	49	0.00	49	0.06	45	0.06	55	0.05	55	0.05
Kapell 1951		24	0.64	12	0.02	22	0.07	27	0.19	44	0.06	27	0.11
Kiepura 1999		9	0.67	9	0.02	5	0.09	15	0.32	16	0.40	7	0.36
Kilenyi 1937		18	0.64	14	0.01	28	0.06	22	0.26	46	0.06	24	0.12
Kissin 1993		10	0.67	23	0.00	12	0.10	7	0.50	46	0.05	20	0.16
Kitain 1937		42	0.61	10	0.02	3	0.14	3	0.52	1	0.72	2	0.61
Kushner 1990		36	0.62	16	0.01	7	0.10	21	0.27	23	0.26	13	0.26
Levy 1951		31	0.63	47	0.00	37	0.08	34	0.08	55	0.05	36	0.06
Luisada 1990		51	0.59	50	0.00	53	0.05	57	0.05	61	0.05	54	0.05
Lushtak 2004		39	0.62	46	0.00	43	0.07	40	0.07	46	0.05	41	0.06
Lympany 1968		27	0.63	13	0.01	14	0.08	19	0.28	31	0.18	15	0.22
Magaloff 1977		34	0.63	41	0.00	41	0.07	39	0.07	60	0.05	40	0.06
Magaloff 1977b		35	0.63	35	0.00	40	0.07	37	0.07	59	0.05	42	0.06
Magin 1975		19	0.64	11	0.02	31	0.08	31	0.14	52	0.05	33	0.08
Milkina 1970		5	0.68	29	0.00	6	0.09	4	0.51	21	0.22	11	0.33
Mohovich 1999		8	0.68	15	0.01	16	0.08	9	0.44	32	0.13	14	0.24
Nadelmann 1956		38	0.62	26	0.00	26	0.06	30	0.15	51	0.04	34	0.08
Ohlsson 1999		43	0.61	61	0.00	47	0.05	52	0.05	45	0.05	52	0.05
Olejniczac 1990		15	0.65	7	0.02	15	0.08	13	0.36	39	0.07	21	0.16
Olejniczak 1991		40	0.61	22	0.00	44	0.07	35	0.07	58	0.05	37	0.06
Osinska 1989		49	0.59	55	0.00	54	0.04	60	0.04	58	0.05	57	0.04
Paderewski 1912		28	0.63	18	0.01	25	0.07	24	0.21	29	0.24	16	0.22
Perahia 1994		21	0.64	33	0.00	27	0.06	29	0.17	16	0.26	17	0.21
Perlemuter 1986		30	0.63	42	0.00	24	0.08	20	0.27	7	0.55	6	0.39
Poblocka 1999		45	0.61	38	0.00	48	0.06	44	0.06	58	0.05	47	0.05
Rangell 2001		47	0.60	36	0.00	46	0.07	36	0.07	58	0.05	43	0.06
Risler 1920		62	0.43	52	0.00	62	0.05	50	0.05	58	0.05	48	0.05
Rosen 1989		26	0.64	24	0.00	18	0.09	17	0.31	15	0.39	8	0.35
Rubinstein 1939		22	0.64	34	0.00	20	0.10	12	0.36	18	0.32	9	0.34
Rubinstein 1952		6	0.68	21	0.01	17	0.08	16	0.31	32	0.12	18	0.19
Rubinstein 1966		14	0.65	32	0.00	30	0.08	25	0.20	43	0.05	30	0.10
Rummel 1943		3	0.68	17	0.01	4	0.18	10	0.42	12	0.43	5	0.42
Shebanova 2002		55	0.57	37	0.00	57	0.05	53	0.05	53	0.05	53	0.05
Smith 1975		11	0.67	43	0.00	11	0.10	6	0.50	55	0.04	23	0.14
Szpilman 1948		44	0.61	31	0.00	36	0.05	48	0.05	55	0.05	46	0.05
Uninsky 1971		7	0.68	6	0.02	8	0.10	5	0.50	31	0.15	12	0.27
Wasowski 1980		23	0.64	56	0.00	34	0.06	43	0.06	60	0.04	45	0.05
Weissenberg 1971		32	0.63	19	0.01	38	0.07	38	0.07	61	0.04	51	0.05
Random 1		65	0.00	65	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	45	0.04	64	0.03
Random 2		63	0.07	63	0.00	63	0.03	63	0.03	3	0.48	25	0.12
Random 3		64	0.03	57	0.00	64	0.02	64	0.02	5	0.53	31	0.10

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).