Beliavsky 2004

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		33	0.67	56	0.00	44	0.05	44	0.05	36	0.06	49	0.05
Ashkenazy 1981		37	0.66	65	0.00	43	0.05	46	0.05	56	0.04	62	0.04
Beliavsky 2004		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
BenOr 1989		18	0.71	63	0.00	26	0.06	21	0.27	55	0.04	36	0.10
Biret 1990		15	0.72	27	0.00	21	0.09	15	0.34	35	0.08	24	0.16
Blet 2003		45	0.64	54	0.00	49	0.04	58	0.04	55	0.05	58	0.04
Block 1995		20	0.71	35	0.00	30	0.12	20	0.29	51	0.05	30	0.12
Brailowsky 1960		31	0.68	16	0.01	31	0.09	30	0.19	15	0.37	10	0.27
Chiu 1999		17	0.72	25	0.00	12	0.13	12	0.38	30	0.26	9	0.31
Clidat 1994		1	0.76	4	0.11	2	0.15	3	0.53	3	0.62	1	0.57
Cohen 1997		24	0.70	12	0.02	34	0.06	38	0.06	20	0.27	29	0.13
Coop 1987		4	0.75	11	0.02	11	0.12	10	0.41	36	0.11	16	0.21
Cortot 1951		25	0.69	29	0.00	33	0.06	37	0.06	26	0.18	37	0.10
Czerny 1949		9	0.73	20	0.01	16	0.08	11	0.41	23	0.29	8	0.34
Czerny 1949b		54	0.59	61	0.00	56	0.04	52	0.04	62	0.04	57	0.04
Ezaki 2006		10	0.72	60	0.00	24	0.07	22	0.26	49	0.07	28	0.13
Falvay 1989		11	0.72	7	0.04	10	0.17	5	0.51	25	0.23	7	0.34
Ferenczy 1958		42	0.64	2	0.12	13	0.11	29	0.21	28	0.16	21	0.18
Fiorentino 1962		28	0.69	49	0.00	20	0.06	24	0.25	31	0.14	19	0.19
Fliere 1977		30	0.68	64	0.00	35	0.08	34	0.08	52	0.05	41	0.06
Fou 1978		32	0.67	39	0.00	28	0.06	27	0.23	35	0.10	26	0.15
Francois 1956		62	0.45	57	0.00	61	0.04	57	0.04	37	0.08	44	0.06
Hatto 1997		44	0.64	50	0.00	53	0.04	51	0.04	61	0.03	65	0.03
Horowitz 1971		57	0.56	23	0.01	58	0.04	53	0.04	58	0.04	63	0.04
Horowitz 1985		60	0.50	24	0.01	39	0.06	41	0.06	53	0.05	46	0.05
Indjic 2001		36	0.66	51	0.00	46	0.06	43	0.06	61	0.04	52	0.05
Kapell 1951		27	0.69	19	0.01	22	0.07	25	0.25	54	0.05	32	0.11
Kiepura 1999		38	0.66	15	0.01	47	0.03	61	0.03	41	0.06	54	0.04
Kilenyi 1937		23	0.70	62	0.00	18	0.08	19	0.29	34	0.12	18	0.19
Kissin 1993		21	0.71	5	0.08	7	0.19	7	0.48	32	0.11	13	0.23
Kitain 1937		61	0.48	14	0.01	59	0.05	47	0.05	43	0.06	53	0.05
Kushner 1990		47	0.63	22	0.01	48	0.04	54	0.04	27	0.23	34	0.10
Levy 1951		8	0.73	9	0.04	9	0.17	2	0.55	29	0.21	6	0.34
Luisada 1990		35	0.66	53	0.00	45	0.06	40	0.06	37	0.07	42	0.06
Lushtak 2004		59	0.53	52	0.00	62	0.05	45	0.05	53	0.05	50	0.05
Lympany 1968		50	0.61	44	0.00	55	0.05	49	0.05	54	0.04	55	0.04
Magaloff 1977		16	0.72	3	0.11	3	0.17	13	0.37	30	0.16	12	0.24
Magaloff 1977b		19	0.71	47	0.00	4	0.14	14	0.35	32	0.12	17	0.20
Magin 1975		29	0.68	42	0.00	42	0.04	56	0.04	51	0.05	56	0.04
Milkina 1970		39	0.65	18	0.01	41	0.06	42	0.06	23	0.20	33	0.11
Mohovich 1999		13	0.72	13	0.01	8	0.17	8	0.44	24	0.30	5	0.36
Nadelmann 1956		26	0.69	32	0.00	32	0.09	31	0.17	26	0.20	20	0.18
Ohlsson 1999		52	0.61	33	0.00	52	0.05	48	0.05	44	0.05	47	0.05
Olejniczac 1990		22	0.70	26	0.00	19	0.06	17	0.32	36	0.07	27	0.15
Olejniczak 1991		14	0.72	36	0.00	25	0.07	26	0.24	35	0.09	25	0.15
Osinska 1989		3	0.75	1	0.22	1	0.21	1	0.60	26	0.29	2	0.42
Paderewski 1912		51	0.61	38	0.00	37	0.09	33	0.09	40	0.06	40	0.07
Perahia 1994		56	0.58	31	0.00	57	0.04	55	0.04	59	0.04	61	0.04
Perlemuter 1986		58	0.54	48	0.00	60	0.07	36	0.07	31	0.15	35	0.10
Poblocka 1999		2	0.76	10	0.02	6	0.17	6	0.48	35	0.09	15	0.21
Rangell 2001		5	0.74	37	0.00	15	0.08	16	0.33	33	0.09	22	0.17
Risler 1920		43	0.64	17	0.01	27	0.06	23	0.26	10	0.49	4	0.36
Rosen 1989		46	0.63	59	0.00	50	0.03	62	0.03	35	0.07	51	0.05
Rubinstein 1939		40	0.65	8	0.04	14	0.10	32	0.16	19	0.29	14	0.22
Rubinstein 1952		53	0.60	45	0.00	54	0.04	59	0.04	56	0.05	64	0.04
Rubinstein 1966		49	0.62	30	0.00	40	0.04	50	0.04	33	0.07	48	0.05
Rummel 1943		48	0.63	43	0.00	29	0.08	28	0.21	35	0.07	31	0.12
Shebanova 2002		55	0.59	34	0.00	51	0.04	60	0.04	49	0.05	59	0.04
Smith 1975		12	0.72	40	0.00	17	0.08	9	0.43	31	0.17	11	0.27
Szpilman 1948		41	0.65	41	0.00	36	0.07	35	0.07	34	0.07	39	0.07
Uninsky 1971		6	0.74	6	0.05	5	0.13	4	0.51	24	0.33	3	0.41
Wasowski 1980		34	0.67	21	0.01	38	0.06	39	0.06	50	0.05	45	0.05
Weissenberg 1971		7	0.73	28	0.00	23	0.06	18	0.31	40	0.08	23	0.16
Random 1		64	0.00	58	0.00	63	0.02	63	0.02	19	0.38	38	0.09
Random 2		63	0.00	55	0.00	64	0.02	64	0.02	32	0.07	60	0.04
Random 3		65	-0.01	46	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	25	0.17	43	0.06

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).